Skip to main content

U.S. government is teaming up with 30 major tech companies to fight robocallers

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler
FCC
If your phone is ringing off the hook, it shouldn’t be because of robocallers. It’s a sentiment most (if not all) consumers seem to hold, one that the government holds, and now, one that more than 30 major tech companies hold as well. According to a Reuters report, the heavy hitters from Silicon Valley are now joining the feds in cracking down on those pesky automated calls.

Companies including AT&T, Alphabet, Apple, Verizon, and Comcast have now signed on to be part of the “Robocall Strike Force,” which is set to work in conjunction with the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to combat the “scourge” that is robocalling. The kickoff meeting for this new task force was held Friday. By October 19, these companies are slated to present the FCC with “concrete plans to accelerate the development and adoption of new tools and solutions,” said AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson, the chair of the strike force.

Recommended Videos

The FCC has been on a warpath against robocalls as of late. Since last year, the federal agency has implemented a number of new rules meant to make it more difficult for these automated messages to reach our phone lines, but last month, it decided to call in the big guns. In July, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler sent letters to Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, and others to help block robocalling.

“This scourge must stop,” Wheeler said on Friday, noting that consumers complain most frequently about these prerecorded nuisances. Blaming “industry inaction” for the continued occurrence of these calls, Wheeler added,  “The bad guys are beating the good guys with technology.”

And the strike force members know they have their work cut out for them. “This is going to require more than individual company initiatives and one-off blocking apps,” Stephenson said. “Robocallers are a formidable adversary, notoriously hard to stop.” But with a team that includes mobile carriers, device makers, operating system developers, network designers, and the government, victory may finally be in sight. Said Stephenson: “We have to come out of this with a comprehensive playbook for all of us to go execute.”

Lulu Chang
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
After 30 years, the original Fire Emblem is finally coming to the U.S.
original fire emblem western release fireemblemshadowdragon

For the first time ever, Nintendo is bringing Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light to the U.S. The 1990 NES classic will be available for the Nintendo Switch on December 4.

Fire Emblem: Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light is the first game in Nintendo's popular Fire Emblem franchise. Originally, the game was only available in Japan, where it became a cult hit and a financial success.

Read more
‘Skyborg’: U.S. Air Force seeks fleet of autonomous planes
Illustration of the ATS F/A-18, part of Boeing's Airpower Teaming System

The U.S. Air Force is getting serious about working with autonomous aircraft and aims to acquire an entire fleet of drones to act as robotic wingmen under its "Skyborg" program, National Defense Magazine reports.

As autonomous aircraft get more sophisticated, they could provide invaluable support to crewed fighter jets or bombers by escorting them into dangerous territories. The Air Force has said it is looking to purchase AI-powered craft to begin testing out their capabilities alongside crewed fighter jets.

Read more
Judge rules that U.S. government can’t force WeChat off app stores
apple tencent wechat tip deal

TikTok is not the only Chinese app to have been saved from a ban at the last minute this weekend: WeChat won't be banned from app stores tomorrow either.

A judge in California has blocked the Trump administration from forcing either Apple or Google to remove the WeChat apps from their app stores, Reuters reports. The judge, U.S. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler, said that a ban would cause hardship and that forcing it would “burden substantially more speech than is necessary to serve the government’s significant interest in national security, especially given the lack of substitute channels for communication.”

Read more