Skip to main content

Clowns, clowns everywhere! Alamo Drafthouse to hold clown-only screening of 'It'

IT
Warner Bros. Pictures/YouTube
Are you scared of clowns? If you answered “yes,” you are correct. If you answered “no,” please try answering correctly.

Alamo Drafthouse — the theater chain which regularly receives “best theater” awards and famously kicks out texters — is holding a clowns-only screening of It on September 9 at its Austin, Texas, location one day after the horror reboot starring Bill Skarsgård premieres nationwide.

Yes, that means what you think it means: The only way to get into the theater is by dressing up as a terrifying clown. Despite the fact that the clown in It is a (spoiler alert) murderous, shape-shifting monster, the Drafthouse is having some fun with the idea, hosting a “Barrel O’ Fun” pre-party prior to the screening where moviegoers will get their faces painted, take pictures in photo booths, and participate in a raffle.

The concept was born of a similar screening the Drafthouse held following the release of Wonder Woman in May, where only women were allowed to attend. In response, someone mockingly wrote on Facebook “…Will there be a male only screening for Thor: Ragnarok or a special screening for It that’s only for those who identify as clowns?” Drafthouse staff steered into the swerve, claiming the idea for themselves and setting up this horrifying event.

The film itself is based on Stephen King’s 1986 novel of the same name, following several children who are terrorized by a monster who takes the form of their greatest fears. The movie — for which we received a chilling trailer in July — promises to have a darker tone than the 1990 miniseries starring Tim Curry. In that version, Pennywise the clown (Curry) was equally likely to crack a joke as he was to murder your face, but the new adaptation doesn’t seem to have much of a sense of humor.

If you live near a Drafthouse theater keep an eye out for special showings, which the theater chain often advertises. On August 31, for example, several locations will be showing Blade Runner: The Final Cut in 4K Ultra HD. That will be a great opportunity for replicants — uh, fans — to prepare for Blade Runner 2049, which comes out October 6.

Nick Hastings
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Nick is a Portland native and a graduate of Saint Mary's College of California with a Bachelor's of Communication. Nick's…
Stranger Things 4 Volume 1 review: Changing up the formula
Gaten Matarazzo, Finn Wolfhard, and Sadie Sink stand in a crowd during a high-school rally in a scene from Stranger Things 4.

It's beginning to feel like the residents of Hawkins, Indiana, just can't catch a break.

Over the course of three seasons of Stranger Things, the characters in the fictional town of Hawkins have dealt with child abductions, murders, and even a secret Soviet invasion -- all while battling supernatural threats from a terrifying alternate dimension known as the Upside Down. At this point, it feels like a relief that Stranger Things 4 -- as the fourth season of the Netflix series is being called -- finally takes the adventures out of Indiana (far out, in fact) to deliver the darkest, most wide-reaching chapter in the saga so far.

Read more
Review: Fiddler’s Journey to the Big Screen highlights a classic
Norman Jewison laughs with Topol in Fiddler's Journey to the Big Screen.

In 1971, a film was released that was both a box office smash (it was the top grosser that year) and a critical hit, garnering 8 Academy Award nominations including Best Picture. New Yorker film critic Pauline Kael, who was very selective about the films she liked, praised the movie, calling it one of the most "powerful" films she had ever seen.

While one might immediately think of The French Connection or A Clockwork Orange, the film in question is actually Fiddler on the Roof, an adaptation of the hit stage musical chronicling a Jewish family in Ukraine as they encounter personal, political, and societal change at the turn of the 20th century. While the musical is still revived on stages around the world, the movie itself seems taken for granted, and the breezy and detailed documentary Fiddler's Journey to the Big Screen makes a convincing case that the film and its director, Norman Jewison, are worth a second look.
A miracle of miracles

Read more
Why the original The Man Who Fell to Earth still holds up
David Bowie looking at the camera in The Man Who Fell to Earth.

When Paramount+ announced a series adaptation of Nicolas Roeg's timeless cult classic The Man Who Fell to Earth from 1976, it seemed like another beloved cult classic unnecessarily adapted into a streaming series. (Picnic at Hanging Rock is the most egregious example of this popular trend.) We live in the age of nostalgia, and studios are looking for any movie that might work as a rebooted miniseries or television show to support the plethora of streaming services. However, the original The Man Who Fell to Earth isn't exactly "viewer-friendly," so what's the need for a remake? If it's faithful to the movie, will mainstream audiences find it a rewarding viewing experience? On the contrary, would the remake do the revered movie a disservice by changing too many things?

The Man Who Fell to Earth is intentionally challenging, blending bizarre imagery with complex and, at times, convoluted storytelling, resulting in a collection of scenes and events passing for a proper narrative. The Man Who Fell to Earth lacks cohesiveness and has glaring plot holes -- surprising, considering the relatively straightforward plot -- yet they seem intentional, in keeping with the project's nature. The film is more interested in asking questions than answering them, leaving fans feeling overwhelmed, not only by the intense and powerful visuals but by the thought-provoking themes that are there to beguile and, perhaps, deliberately confuse.
The role he was born to play

Read more