Skip to main content

News junkies searching via Google to see fewer free stories from paid-for sites

google
Ken Wolter /123rf
Subscription-based publishers have long lambasted Google over its contentious “One Click Free” policy that forced them to offer online readers at least three free articles via Google to ensure its content appeared prominently in search results.

Google introduced the system more than 10 years ago, although at that time a minimum of five articles had to be offered to readers. Publishers such as The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and the Financial Times complained that offering free content made it harder for them to sell subscriptions, so in 2015 Google cut the free-article limit from five to three.

But still the publishers protested.

Recommended Videos

Having reevaluated how people consume media and the current business models employed by myriad news services, Google announced on Monday it was ditching First Click Free.

In a move that will mean fewer freebies for news junkies, the web giant said it’s now placing more control in the hands of publishers with a new system called Flexible Sampling that allows them to set how many free articles — if any — a reader can see via Google’s search engine before they come up against a paywall.

Encouraging publishers to offer free content gives Google some assurance that news fans will still hit its search engine to seek out content from a range of news services, and the company argued that a try-before-you-buy approach would ultimately help publishers to gain more subscribers. Now, with Flexible Sampling, publishers have more freedom that allows them to offer a reader, say, 10 free articles over an entire month instead of a set number of stories each day.

Google once described First Click Free as a way of helping users to “get access to high-quality news with a minimum of effort, while also ensuring that publishers with a paid subscription model get discovered in Google Search and via Google News.”

But now the company has scrapped it, a move that it’s decided to take following analysis of its “own research, publisher feedback, and monthslong experiments with The New York Times and the Financial Times, both of which operate successful subscription services,” Richard Gingras, vice president of news at Google, wrote in a message posted on Monday.

Gingras added that his team is also working on developing a suite of products and services to assist publishers in finding new audiences that could lead to more subscriptions and revenue growth.

These include making it easier for readers to subscribe — with a single click — by utilizing Google’s existing identity and payment technologies. It will also offer seamless access to paid-for content across multiple platforms, including the publisher’s site or mobile app, Google Newsstand, Google Search, and Google News.

Spelling out the importance of an effective web-based system for subscription-driven publishers in a fast-changing marketplace, Financial Times CFO Jon Slade said, “It’s extremely clear that advertising alone can no longer pay for the production and distribution of high-quality journalism, and at the same time the societal need for sustainable independent journalism has never been greater.

“Reader-based revenue, aka paid content, or subscription services, are therefore not just a nice-to-have, but an essential component of a publisher’s revenue composition,” Slade said.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
How to change margins in Google Docs
Laptop Working from Home

When you create a document in Google Docs, you may need to adjust the space between the edge of the page and the content --- the margins. For instance, many professors have requirements for the margin sizes you must use for college papers.

You can easily change the left, right, top, and bottom margins in Google Docs and have a few different ways to do it.

Read more
What is Microsoft Teams? How to use the collaboration app
A close-up of someone using Microsoft Teams on a laptop for a videoconference.

Online team collaboration is the new norm as companies spread their workforce across the globe. Gone are the days of primarily relying on group emails, as teams can now work together in real time using an instant chat-style interface, no matter where they are.

Using Microsoft Teams affords video conferencing, real-time discussions, document sharing and editing, and more for companies and corporations. It's one of many collaboration tools designed to bring company workers together in an online space. It’s not designed for communicating with family and friends, but for colleagues and clients.

Read more
Microsoft Word vs. Google Docs
A person using a laptop that displays various Microsoft Office apps.

For the last few decades, Microsoft Word has been the de facto standard for word processors across the working world. That's finally starting to shift, and it looks like one of Google's productivity apps is the heir apparent. The company's Google Docs solution (or to be specific, the integrated word processor) is cross-platform and interoperable, automatically syncs, is easily shareable, and perhaps best of all, is free.

However, using Google Docs proves it still has a long way to go before it can match all of Word's features -- Microsoft has been developing its word processor for over 30 years, after all, and millions still use Microsoft Word. Will Google Docs' low barrier to entry and cross-platform functionality win out? Let's break down each word processor in terms of features and capabilities to help you determine which is best for your needs.
How does each word processing program compare?
To put it lightly, Microsoft Word has an incredible advantage over Google Docs in terms of raw technical capability. From relatively humble beginnings in the 1980s, Microsoft has added new tools and options in each successive version. Most of the essential editing tools are available in Google Docs, but users who are used to Word will find it limited.

Read more