Skip to main content

ITC finds limited infringement in Kodak/Apple dispute

apple-iphone-4
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The U.S. International Trade Commission has finally weighed in on Kodak’s patent infringement case against Apple and RIM—and there wasn’t much good news for the photography giant. Although the federal agency did find some limited instances of patent infringement, the ITC essentially upheld the findings of one of its judges earlier this year that found neither Apple nor RIM were infringing on Kodak technology. Although the ruling modified some of the terms of the suit and sent some points back for further review—and Kodak could still win on those points—the commission’s decision reduces the likelihood that Kodak will see a major payday in the form of a settlement or damages.

Kodak shares have fallen significantly on the ruling, partially because the company had recently been making statements to Bloomberg and other outlets that it believed the case could bring $1 billion or more its bottom line.

Recommended Videos

The commission’s ruling revised definitions for “motion processor” and “still processor” used in Kodak’s patent complaints and asked the judge in the case to re-examine the claims with the new definitions to determine if Kodak’s patent was infringed with those definitions. The commission also ruled that Apple and RIM did infringe on a Kodak patent under a revised definition of “at least three different colors,” as well as a patent covering “initiating capture of a still image while previewing a motion image.” However, the commission threw out Kodak’s claims of infringement in regard to flash photos (saying Kodak had waived rights to make the claim) and referred Kodaks claims on non-flash photos back to the original judge.

The commission has not ruled on any penalties.

Kodak said it was gratified for the commissions’ decision to modify the judge’s original ruling. “We remain extremely confident this case will ultimately conclude in Kodak’s favor,” said Kodak general counsel Laura G. Quatela, in a statement.

Neither RIM nor Apple has yet commented on the ruling.

Kodak’s infringement claims against RIM primarily center on technology for creating a still image during preview on a camera’s LCD display. Kodak won a case against South Korea’s Samsung back in 2009 that reportedly resulted in a settlement worth more than $900 million to Kodak.

Topics
Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
In 2023, Apple needs to fix its embarrassing 5GB iCloud limit
Apple ID banner in the Settings app on an iPhone 14 Pro

The year is 2030 and Apple has released its first foldable iPhone, the iPhone 21 Pro Ultra Max Fold. You can get up to 4TB of storage, and prices start at $2,500. But you still only have 5GB of free iCloud storage.

Just kidding. Well, about the hardware part. It’s almost 2023, and yes, Apple still only gives you 5GB of storage for free with iCloud. Seriously? There's no arguing that 5GB is literally nothing these days. It’s shocking how Apple continues to only offer 5GB for free, despite the fact that even competitors offer a little more than that before going to paid tiers. Heading into 2023, it’s time for Apple to bump that up — even just a little bit.
5GB is no longer a realistic number

Read more
Apple Music Replay 2022: where to find and how to see your listening stats
Apple Music Replay 2022 on an iPhone.

The end of the year is an exciting time for a few different reasons. There are family gatherings for the holidays, presents to gift and receive, and a chance to look back at your music listening stats with Apple Music Replay.

Read more
Google’s Android monopoly finds its biggest challenge, and Apple might be next
Apps screen on the Google Pixel 7.

The Competition Commission of India slapped Google with two hefty fines over anti-competitive strategies that have allowed it to dominate the mobile ecosystem in India. Totaling over $250 million, the penalties reprimand Google for forcing smartphone makers to avoid Android forks, prefer Google’s web search service, and pre-install popular cash cows like YouTube on phones.

Google was also disciplined for forcing its own billing system on developers that allowed the giant to take up to a 30% share of all in-app purchases for applications listed on the app store. Google is not really a stranger to titanic penalties; The EU handed Google a record-breaking fine of approximately $5 billion in 2018 for abusing its dominant market position — a penalty that was upheld in September this year following Google’s appeal.

Read more