AT&T’s purchase of Qualcomm’s spectrum halted by FCC

By Caleb Garling Published August 9, 2011

AT&T is not a company unfamiliar with government regulation. Yesterday the Federal Communications Commission’s chief of Wireless Telecommunications, Rick Kaplan, sent a letter to both AT&T and Qualcomm saying that more time was needed in reviewing AT&T’s purchase of Qualcomm’s 700 MHz spectrum, in a deal worth $1.93 billion.

The slowdown is also on the heels of AT&T’s purchase of T-Mobile last March, which will be halted as well.

Recommended Videos

Kaplan said in his letter, “The Commission’s ongoing review has confirmed that the proposed transactions raise a number of related issues, including, but not limited to, questions regarding AT&T’s aggregation of spectrum throughout the nation, particularly in overlapping areas. As a result, we have concluded that the best way to determine whether either or both of the proposed transactions serve the public interest is to consider them in a coordinated manner at this time, without prejudice to independent treatment at a later date.”

The FCC had promised an uphill climb for AT&T in these deals and it appears to have made good on it. Perhaps the one silver lining in the delay for AT&T is that the government is still viewing the T-Mobile and Qualcomm cases separately, rather than combining the two and making a single ruling.

Topics

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Mobile

A new FCC rule could make your phone carrier way less annoying

Someone holding an iPhone 15 Pro Max outside on a patio, showing the back of the Natural Titanium color.

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed a new rule that could eliminate one of the most frustrating aspects of smartphone ownership: carrier locking. FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel wants to require mobile providers to unlock customers’ mobile phones within 60 days of activation, making it easier for consumers to switch providers.

The proposal, which will be discussed at the commission’s July 18 meeting, aims to help consumers by establishing universal unlocking requirements for mobile service providers. Carrier locking serves two purposes: deterring theft and encouraging customer retention, as a locked phone cannot be connected to another carrier.

Mobile

T-Mobile is getting rid of its misleading ‘Price Lock’ policy

T-Mobile CEO Mike Sievert standing in front of a banner that reads Internet Freedom.

T-Mobile just got into some trouble with the National Advertising Program (NAD), a part of the BBB National Programs, an independent non-profit organization, for advertising its supposed “Price Lock” policy for 5G internet service.

Basically, the premise behind the “Price Lock” was a promise not to increase prices for customers who were on the Un-Contract Promise: “Starting January 18, 2024, customers activating or switching to an eligible rate plan get our Price Lock guarantee that only you can change what you pay—and we mean it!”

Mobile

5 carriers you should use instead of T-Mobile

When it comes to performance, quality, and reliability, T-Mobile is undoubtedly one of the best carriers in the U.S. It offers the fastest speeds and the broadest coverage with reasonably priced plans that include quite a few perks.

However, that may still add up to more than you want to pay; top-notch performance comes with a higher price tag attached. The good news is that T-Mobile is far from the only game in town. In addition to the other two of the big three U.S. carriers -- AT&T and Verizon -- there are dozens of Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOs) that piggyback on the big carrier networks with more affordable plans that offer the same coverage and great performance at a fraction of the price. You’ll get fewer perks, and customer service may not be as responsive, but those may be reasonable tradeoffs for how much you’ll save.