Skip to main content

Blood oxygen tracking isn’t coming back to the Apple Watch anytime soon

Apple Watch Ultra taking a measurement for blood oxygen levels.
Christine Romero-Chan / Digital Trends

One of the major selling points of Apple Watches in recent years has been the ability to test users’ blood oxygen levels. Unfortunately, ongoing litigation has prevented this feature from being included in Apple Watches sold in the U.S. since January. Now, it seems unlikely that this situation will change soon.

On Friday, a Delaware jury found that health-monitoring technology company Masimo infringed on some of Apple’s earlier smartwatch patents. As a result, Apple received an award of only $250. However, the same jury ruled that Masimo’s current watches did not infringe on the patents that Apple accused it of copying. Consequently, an injunction remains in effect in the U.S. that prevents the company from offering blood oxygen tracking on new watches sold in the country.

Recommended Videos

At the beginning of the year, the U.S. International Trade Commission ruled in favor of Masimo, saying Apple’s use of pulse oximeter technology in the Apple Watch violated Masimo’s patents. As such, any Apple Watch sold after January 18, 2024, couldn’t ship with the feature. Soon after, Apple appealed the decision and countersued, alleging Masimo copied Apple Watch features to use in its smartwatches. Since then, it has been unsuccessful in getting the injunction lifted by a court.

Apple’s blood oxygen feature was first available on the Apple Watch Series 6 in 2020. Since then, it has been available on every non-Apple Watch SE model up to the injunction. The all-new Apple Watch Series 10 has the hardware to support blood oxygen tracking. Therefore, whenever a resolution is reached between the two companies, Apple could push out a software update to add those features to watches currently without them.

Blood oxygen tracking measures the percentage of oxygen currently carried by a user’s red blood cells. Numbers below 95% suggest possible health issues, including respiratory conditions, sleep apnea, heart conditions, or more. It’s an incredibly helpful feature, but due to this latest ruling, it will continue to be missing from Apple Watches for the foreseeable future.

Bryan M. Wolfe
Bryan M. Wolfe has over a decade of experience as a technology writer. He writes about mobile.
Why I’m ditching my Apple Watch Ultra 2
The front of the Apple Watch Ultra.

The Apple Watch Ultra 2 is a fantastic smartwatch. It's big, stunning, and still the most capable Apple Watch you can buy today.

It's the Apple Watch I've been wearing for the past year, but recently, I decided to get rid of it in favor of a different model. Why? Let me tell you.
My relationship with the Apple Watch

Read more
I don’t want to say goodbye to my Apple Watch Ultra
A person wearing the Apple Watch Ultra.

I probably shouldn’t have done it, but ahead of saying goodbye to my original Apple Watch Ultra, I put it back on to test out watchOS 11.

Why shouldn’t I have reacquainted myself with Apple’s chunkiest smartwatch? Despite initially not being that bothered about moving on, I’m now having second thoughts about it.
Why I'm getting rid of my Ultra

Read more
Why I spent a ridiculous amount of money on my next Apple Watch
A render of the Slate titanium Apple Watch Series 10.

I’ve spent quite a lot of money on an Apple Watch to prove myself wrong. When Apple ditched the stainless steel model in favor of a new titanium model with a polished finish and sapphire crystal, plus a beautifully delicate new watch face, its intentions in my mind were clear: This was an Apple Watch for those who truly wanted something more luxurious and more special than the aluminum or the old stainless steel version.

But I’m not convinced an Apple Watch can ever be luxurious or even that special, no matter what it’s made from. So, I spent $800 on an Apple Watch Series 10 to find out.
Wear what you want

Read more