Skip to main content

Facebook updates Kosovo’s status from ‘It’s complicated’ to ‘country’

facebook kosovo country

Facebook can be used for all sorts of things: Complaining about the weather, sharing links, saying stupid things about your boss. And now, we can add “declaring national sovereignty” to the list.

You read that right: Facebook recently recognized the disputed territory of Kosovo as a “country,” following a campaign by “digital diplomat” volunteers. That puts the social network in line with 105 countries around the world that view Kosovo, which declared independence 2008, as a full-fledged country.

Ordinarily, country status is more or less granted by the United Nations, of which Kosovo is currently campaigning to become a member nation. Unfortunately for the tiny region, membership requires approval from all five nations that are permanent members of the UN Security Council, which include the U.S., China, Russia, France, and the U.K. But neither China nor Russia recognizes Kosovo’s sovereignty.

While Facebook’s recognition might not be the same as the UN’s, Kosovo officials are still pleased at the status update. According to the BBC, Petrit Selimi, a deputy minister in Kosovo’s Foreign Affairs Ministry, is “ecstatic” about the Facebook upgrade.

Facebook, for its part, claims that its recognition of Kosovo as a country was not a company decision, but the result of its algorithms sifting through user-generated content to allow for more accurate check-ins. 

“Locations that are suggested for check-ins and ad targeting are based on information we have received from user-generated content and third-party sources,” a Facebook spokesman told the BBC. So, as far as users go, the ability to check in from the “country” of Kosovo is really the only change – but a meaningful one at that.

Kosovo is but one of many regions around the world that remain stuck in the limbo between “country” and “not country” – including places like the Palestinian Territories, or just Palestine, depending on who you ask.

For an excellent primer on just how absurdly complex this whole national sovereignty thing is, check out the video below:

[Image via Pincasso/Shutterstock]

Andrew Couts
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
Facebook audit finds it’s not doing enough to protect civil rights
mark zuckerberg speaking

Facebook’s decision to not fact-check political posts has left its platform vulnerable to misuse by politicians to interfere with voting and suppress civil rights, according to a two-year audit of the company’s policies and practices by civil rights expert Laura W. Murphy and Megan Cacace.

The 100-page evaluation says Facebook repeatedly contradicted its own policies -- enabling malicious actors to abuse its platform for spreading hate, discrimination, and more. The review adds that the social network’s executives on numerous occasions failed to take into account civil rights standards and contradicted its own policies in the name of free expression.

Read more
Verizon pulls ads from Facebook and Instagram amid growing boycott
total mobile protection

Verizon is the latest company to join a growing boycott of corporations pulling advertising from Facebook over the platform's content moderation policies.

The cellular giant joins cohorts REI, Patagonia, Ben & Jerry's, and The North Face in the #StopHateForProfit campaign -- which also includes more than 100 other small businesses pledging to stop advertising on Facebook and Instagram for the month of July.

Read more
Study: Facebook is skimping on moderation, and it’s harming the public
facebook ftc fine not enough header

A new report from the New York University Stern Center for Business and Human Rights alleges that Facebook and other social media companies (Twitter and YouTube are also mentioned specifically) are outsourcing too much of their moderation to third-party companies, resulting in a workforce of moderators who are treated as “second-class citizens,” doing psychologically damaging work without adequate counseling or care.

Most disturbingly, the report points out how a lax attitude toward moderation has led to “Other harms -- in some cases, lethal in nature ... as a result of Facebook’s failure to ensure adequate moderation for non-Western countries that are in varying degrees of turmoil. In these countries, the platform, and/or its affiliated messaging service WhatsApp, have become important means of communication and advocacy but also vehicles to incite hatred and in some instances, violence.”

Read more