Skip to main content

Jury tells Samsung to pay $119.6 million to Apple for patent infringement

Samsung vs Apple
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Decided within a San Jose court earlier today, a jury in California just awarded Apple a judgement of $119.6 million from Samsung for infringing on patents related to the development of new smartphones. Specifically, the jury members believe that Samsung directly infringed on Apple’s “quick links” patent in all Samsung mobile devices. That particular patent is related to links embedded within text and the process that occurs when the user interacts with those links. In fact, the bulk of the damages were awarded for Samsung use of “quick links” on the S3 smartphone, approximately $52 million of the overall total.

In addition, the jury found that Samsung infringed on Apple’s “slide to unlock” patent on the Samsung’s Admire, Galaxy Nexus and Stratosphere. However, the jury ruled that Samsung didn’t not infringe on that patent when it came to the Samsung Galaxy S2, Galaxy S2 Epic 4G Touch and the Galaxy S2 Skyrocket. However, the jury also found that Samsung infringed on Apple’s “autocorrect” patent on all Samsung devices.

Recommended Videos

Interestingly, the jury ruled that Samsung did not infringe on Apple’s “universal search” patent or Apple’s “background sync” patent. Conversely, they also found that Apple was infringing on Samsung’s video transmission patents by offering FaceTime video calling to users. However, the penalty for this infringement was much smaller in comparison to the other monetary award. Basically, Apple has to pay Samsung a sum of $158,400 for the infringement or perhaps just reduce the overall award to Apple down to $119.44 million.

apple-vs-samsung-fight
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Of course, $119.6 million is just a minor portion of the $2.2 billion that Apple was originally seeking for the patent infringement. Approximately five percent of the original figure, some analysts are calling this a win for Samsung, in that the total figure was far less than what Apple originally wanted. It’s also likely that Apple spent tens of millions on legal fees, thus diluting the monetary judgement even more. Alternatively, Samsung was seeking 6 million for patent infringement related to the video transmission patents. 

Releasing a statement about the decision, an Apple representative said “We are grateful to the jury and the court for their service. Today’s ruling reinforces what courts around the world have already found: that Samsung willfully stole our ideas and copied our products. We are fighting to defend the hard work that goes into beloved products like the iPhone, which our employees devote their lives to designing and delivering for our customers.” Samsung has not released a statement about the decision at the time of publication of this article.

Today’s judgement hasn’t completely brought the trial to an end though. The jury will be meeting again on Monday to determine other damages related to the Samsung Galaxy S2. Based on today’s ruling, that could increase the overall award for Apple. According to trial coverage, the jury is comprised of a former business executive at IBM, an assistant at Seagate, an employee of the Los Gatos police department, another executive assistant, a former teacher and a property manager. Before reaching the verdict, the jury deliberated for three days. Prior to that, this trial lasted about four weeks. 

Mike Flacy
By day, I'm the content and social media manager for High-Def Digest, Steve's Digicams and The CheckOut on Ben's Bargains…
Everything you need to know about the OnePlus 13
Official OnePlus 13 product renders showing rear panel colors.

OnePlus is an excellent brand that offers powerful flagship phones at a great value compared to some of its competitors. We followed every rumor about the OnePlus 13 for months, but now it's here — and it's everything we hoped for. It might not be available in the Western market yet, but it will be soon.

So, what makes the OnePlus 13 so special? Here's everything you need to know about OnePlus' latest flagship.
When is the OnePlus 13 being released?

Read more
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400: the race is on
Comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and MediaTek Dimensity 9400 processors.

The flagship mobile silicon race has entered its next phase, one that will dictate the trajectory of Android hardware heading into 2025. Merely weeks after MediaTek wowed us with the Dimensity 9400 system on a chip (SoC), Qualcomm also pulled a surprise with the reveal of the Snapdragon 8 Elite.

But this time around, the battle is not as straightforward. Where MediaTek is working closely with Arm and adopting its latest CPU and graphics innovations, Qualcomm has firmly put its faith in custom cores. These are no ordinary cores, but a next-gen iteration of the same fundamental tech stack that powers Windows on ARM laptops.

Read more
Discolored line on your new Kindle? You aren’t alone
Amazon Kindle Colorsoft Signature Edition on a table.

The new Kindle Colorsoft Signature Edition is the first full-color e-reader, and a lot of bookworms couldn't wait to get their hands on it. Sadly, many people are reporting the display has a discolored yellow area at the bottom of the screen. The problem is so widespread that the Kindle Colorsoft dropped to an average review rating of 2.6 out of 5, although it does remain the bestselling e-book reader at the moment.

The cause of the discoloration isn't clear. Some users report that it only happens when using the edge lighting feature on the Kindle, while others say it appeared after a software update. Either way, the yellowing is a problem, especially on a device that Amazon has marketed as being great for comics and graphic novel fans. It's hard to enjoy the colorwork in a comic when it's distorted.

Read more