Skip to main content

Patent battle: Apple tries again to ban sale of Samsung devices, wants damages increase

samsung wants take patent battle apple supreme court vs

When it emerged recently that Apple and Google had found a way to put the pair’s patent-related issues to bed, it led to the suggestion that Apple and Samsung may be able to do the same.

However, papers filed in a California court Friday show such a resolution to be far from the minds of Apple’s legal team, with the iPhone maker asking for a retrial in an effort to increase the amount a jury recently ordered Samsung to pay after it found the Korean tech firm to have infringed a number of Apple’s patents.

In the trial, which concluded at the beginning of this month, Apple had been battling to secure a $2.2 billion payout from the Korean company for various patent violations, though the jury arrived at a much lower figure: $119.6 million.

Apple is also asking the courts to impose a sales ban on Samsung products – predominantly older devices – that use technology related to the infringed patents. These include the Admire, Galaxy Nexus, Galaxy Note, Galaxy Note 2, Galaxy S2, Galaxy S2 Epic 4G Touch, Galaxy S2 Skyrocket, Galaxy S3, and Stratosphere.

In the papers filed Friday, Apple claimed it “will suffer irreparable harm if Samsung continues its use of the infringing features,” and that “monetary damages cannot adequately compensate Apple for this resulting irreparable harm.” Previous requests from Apple to ban Samsung products from sale have made little progress, with many expecting this latest effort to end without success.

Samsung spokesperson Adam Yates responded to the Cupertino company’s latest move, saying, “After the jury rejected Apple’s grossly exaggerated damages claim, Apple is once again leaning on the court to push other smartphones out of the market. If granted, this would stifle fair competition and limit choice for American consumers.”

[Source: Bloomberg / Court papers 1 2]

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Google, Apple, Samsung, and OnePlus camera test exposes poor performers
The Pixel 6, iPhone SE, Galaxy A53, and Nord 2T camera modules.

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G has five cameras on the back, the OnePlus Nord 2T has three, the Google Pixel 6 has two, and the Apple iPhone SE (2022) has just one camera. Surely, due to these differences, it would be a very unfair fight to compare them all?

That's precisely what we wanted to find out! Let's take a look and see if having multiple cameras on your phone really makes a difference to photo quality, or if those extra sensors are little more than fluff.
The phones and cameras
It may look like the phones in the test aren’t really competing with each other, but if you’ve got somewhere around $500 or 500 British pounds to spend, then these will likely all show up in your search. We’re not going to compare the hardware here, and are instead going to concentrate only on camera performance. To do that, we should first look at the camera specs on each phone before we get to the photos.

Read more
Apple is banned from selling 5G iPhones in Colombia — here’s why
Apple's rumored hardware subscription service is a compelling rental service

5G iPhones have been slapped with a sales ban in Colombia due to a 5G patent infringement dispute between Apple and Ericsson.

A Colombian court in Bogotá swung the ban hammer on Saturday, saying that Apple is unable to sell the 5G iPhones nor import them into the country, even though Apple argued there are no 5G networks available for Colombian consumers. The ban affects the latest models, including the iPhone 12, iPhone 13, and the iPad Pro, which the court found infringed Ericsson's patent pertaining to 5G tech.

Read more
Every phone company wants a walled garden as nice as Apple’s
Boxes for an Apple Watch, iPhones, and Airpods sit on a desk.

At its annual developer conference, WWDC 2022, Apple will give us a preview of what the next versions of iOS, MacOS, watchOS, and tvOS bring to its enviably reliable ecosystem. However, to others, the same ecosystem is often likened to a walled garden, with attractive but carnivorous plants that make for a pleasing entry but an arduous and frustrating exit. But over those walls, some are peeking in with envious eyes.
How has Apple built such an impressively sticky ecosystem, and why do others want so desperately to replicate it?
Lured and locked in

Apple has long kept people closely tied to its ecosystem of products. Those who own one Apple product are often drawn to buy more. The harmony with which products work with each other is (primarily) what fuels this obsession. Even though Apple products are not flawless, the general notion is that they are great at what they are supposed to do -- and that perception contributes to Apple's success. Statista notes that Apple was the world's top-most technology company in terms of its market value in 2021.  
But it's not because of the devices alone that Apple's ecosystem thrives. Apple's operating systems and its suite of applications are intended to be exclusive to Apple devices -- a strategy it has always maintained, but especially since Steve Jobs's return to the company. But while this exclusivity grants Apple owners bragging rights in front of others, it also compels them to stay confined within the proverbial walls of its glamorous garden. 
Apple's methodology has always been to lock you into the ecosystem. In today's setting, escaping the hardware is easier but transitioning from a familiar software tool to another can cause headaches. Apple keeps its garden walls high, and by maintaining superior hardware quality and compelling people to purchase subscriptions to its services, scaling the walls becomes a herculean task. It's not always an overtly obvious lock-in either, it's the way many features "just work" together that's equally as effective.
For example, Apple devices feature Handoff, which allows multiple actions between devices, and AirDrop lets you quickly share documents and files between Apple devices, while tools such as Sidecar and Universal Control allow seamlessly integrated use of your Mac and iPad. Even Apple's iMessage locks people in by displaying messages sent from outside the Apple ecosystem in green, while those from Apple devices show up in blue. It has led to the system being called discriminatory towards non-Apple users.
Besides controlling individual apps, Apple rigorously controls how you install them. Apple inherently opposes sideloading apps on iPhone and iPad citing security concerns. 
Every company wants an ecosystem

Read more