Skip to main content

Verizon and Sprint ordered to pay $158 million in fines over cramming charges

verizon sprint cramming charges
Image used with permission by copyright holder
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have slammed Sprint and Verizon with a collective $158 million in fines after the conclusion of an investigation over “mobile cramming” allegations. Verizon will be fined $90 million, and Sprint will receive a lesser fine of $68 million.

The investigation hinges on a particularly dastardly method of revenue collection, wherein major carriers add seemingly minor increases to their customers bills for small fines and services. This tactic is referred to as “cramming, and the FCC and FTC have been investigating carriers for a while now. Sprint and Verizon are not the first companies the two agencies have set their sights on. Recently, both T-Mobile and AT&T were fined for cramming charges.

Recommended Videos

The FCC memo states that Sprint and Verizon “billed customers millions of dollars in unauthorized third-party premium text messaging services [PSMS], a practice called ‘cramming.”

“The monthly charge for these third-party premium text messaging services ranged from $0.99 to $14.00, but typically were $9.99 per month,” the memo reads. “Verizon retained 30 percent or more of each third-party charge that it billed, while Sprint received approximately 35 percent of collected revenues for each of its third-party charges.”

The many customers who complained to the FCC stated that they never added the third-party services for which they were charged to their plans, or authorized the charges at all. When the customers contacted their respective carriers for a refund, the carriers refused to reimburse them. When the FCC later sought proof that customers had asked for the services in question, the carriers were “unable to prove that these services were ever requested.” The carriers were thus found guilty of cramming charges.

About $120 million of the total settlements are intended for customer refunds. The carriers agreed to halt the practice in 2013, after being called to the attention of the federal agencies, but the settlements indicate that the companies continued the charges into 2014.

Current and former Verizon customers can submit claims for refunds here, and Sprint customers can do so here. If you have had any un-refunded PSMS charges billed since July 1, 2010, you can submit a claim until December 31, 2015.

Andre Revilla
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Andre Revilla is an entrepreneur and writer from Austin, TX that has been working in and covering the consumer tech space for…
Everything you need to know about the OnePlus 13
Official OnePlus 13 product renders showing rear panel colors.

OnePlus is an excellent brand that offers powerful flagship phones at a great value compared to some of its competitors. We followed every rumor about the OnePlus 13 for months, but now it's here — and it's everything we hoped for. It might not be available in the Western market yet, but it will be soon.

So, what makes the OnePlus 13 so special? Here's everything you need to know about OnePlus' latest flagship.
When is the OnePlus 13 being released?

Read more
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400: the race is on
Comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and MediaTek Dimensity 9400 processors.

The flagship mobile silicon race has entered its next phase, one that will dictate the trajectory of Android hardware heading into 2025. Merely weeks after MediaTek wowed us with the Dimensity 9400 system on a chip (SoC), Qualcomm also pulled a surprise with the reveal of the Snapdragon 8 Elite.

But this time around, the battle is not as straightforward. Where MediaTek is working closely with Arm and adopting its latest CPU and graphics innovations, Qualcomm has firmly put its faith in custom cores. These are no ordinary cores, but a next-gen iteration of the same fundamental tech stack that powers Windows on ARM laptops.

Read more
Discolored line on your new Kindle? You aren’t alone
Amazon Kindle Colorsoft Signature Edition on a table.

The new Kindle Colorsoft Signature Edition is the first full-color e-reader, and a lot of bookworms couldn't wait to get their hands on it. Sadly, many people are reporting the display has a discolored yellow area at the bottom of the screen. The problem is so widespread that the Kindle Colorsoft dropped to an average review rating of 2.6 out of 5, although it does remain the bestselling e-book reader at the moment.

The cause of the discoloration isn't clear. Some users report that it only happens when using the edge lighting feature on the Kindle, while others say it appeared after a software update. Either way, the yellowing is a problem, especially on a device that Amazon has marketed as being great for comics and graphic novel fans. It's hard to enjoy the colorwork in a comic when it's distorted.

Read more