Skip to main content

Apple has sold 2.5 million smartwatches, but demand has dipped

Apple Watch front angle
Bill Roberson/Digital Trends
How many smartwatches has Apple sold so far? We don’t have any official figures but there are plenty of analysts and industry watchers willing to have a stab at an estimate. The latest such firm is Slice Intelligence, which studies consumer spending in the U.S., and the projected statistics show demand has dropped significantly.

According to Slice Intelligence, 2.5 million Apple Watches have been ordered, with over half of those placed on the first day. Since then, demand has been much lower, with orders usually remaining under 30,000 per day (about 11 million sales a year). There was a small spike when the first shipments started (and prompted a flurry of reviews and unboxing videos) but generally speaking demand has stayed pretty flat.

Recommended Videos

Those aren’t disastrous figures for Apple — it took two years to shift the same number of iPods — and it’s worth noting Slice Intelligence’s data is based on a sample of just 14,000 people in the U.S. What’s more, sales will no doubt sales will pick up further when the Apple Watch is available in stores.

Nevertheless it’s a sign that this is going to be more of a niche device than a runaway success. With Apple selling 61.17 million iPhones over the last reported quarter, Tim Cook and his team might have been expecting a few more of those buyers to pick up an Apple Watch too.

Estimating just how many Apple Watches are finding a home is a difficult business. Thai analyst firm KGI Securities has lowered its initial prediction to 15 million units sold in the first year, while Morgan Stanley has optimistically raised its own estimates to 36 million. Even Apple won’t give us the full story at its next quarterly results briefing, as Apple Watch sales will be bundled in with iPods, Apple TVs, and other accessories.

Via Quartz

David Nield
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Dave is a freelance journalist from Manchester in the north-west of England. He's been writing about technology since the…
5 things the Amazfit GTR 3 Pro can do that the Apple Watch Series 7 can’t
Always-on screen mode on the Amazfit GTR 3 Pro.

The Apple Watch Series 7 goes on sale starting October 15, and the first batch of reviews have already dropped. While you might already be keen on buying an Apple Watch Series 7, we're here to show you five things it can't do compared to the Amazfit GTR 3 Pro which we're also putting to the test.
1. Automatic nap tracking
Source: Amazfit Image used with permission by copyright holder

The Apple Watch Series 7 can track your sleep. It can also track your naps. However, to use this feature, you need to create a sleep schedule on your iPhone. On the other hand, the Amazfit GTR 3 Pro tracks your sleep automatically. All you need to do is wear it on your wrist while sleeping. Amazfit even says that it can track naps that exceed 20 minutes, which most other smartwatches confuse for genuine sleep. Automatic naps tracking is extremely useful for people who enjoy naps, work the night shift, or simply have an irregular sleep schedule Cosmo Kramer style. That's where the GTR 3 Pro can keep tracking where the Series 7 can't.
2. Much more data on sleep
Part of sleep tracking is numbers, and sure enough, the Apple Watch Series 7 tells you how many hours you spent in the bed and how many of them you actually slept. On the other hand, the Amazfit GTR 3 Pro can monitor sleep stages, track sleep breathing quality and give you suggestions for sleep habit improvements. The smartwatch allows you to check your sleep data quickly, easily, and shows up directly on the watch screen -- so there's no need to go swiping through your phone and launching apps when you first wake up.
3. Stress Monitor

Read more
The Apple Watch Series 7 finally has official pre-order and release dates
Apple Watch Series 7 sleep data.

Alongside the new iPhones and new iPads, Apple also announced the Apple Watch Series 7 at its September event. Unlike those other products, the company did not announce the pre-order or release dates for the new Watch 7 -- until today. Apple has finally announced teh pre-order date for the Apple Watch Series 7, and it'll be going live this Friday, with shipments a week later.

The Apple Watch Series 7 will be available for pre-order starting at at 5. a.m. PT/8. a.m. ET on Friday, October 8, and you'll be able to shop for one in stores starting Friday, October 15, if you're more of a tactile buyer. While the iPhone 13 series and iPad Mini 6 have already reached customers, issues with the supply chain delayed the Watch 7's release slightly.

Read more
5 things we love about WatchOS 8, and 1 that has us baffled
World Time watch face in WatchOS 8.

Apple has released WatchOS 8, the latest software for its Apple Watch smartwatch, and I’ve been trying it out on both the Apple Watch Series 3 and the Apple Watch Series 6. (Naturally it will also come preinstalled on the new Apple Watch Series 7.) This is a modest update in terms of new features, but there are still plenty of things to try out. Here's what has impressed so far, along with one feature that's not what we want at all.
The two new watch faces are great
There are two new watch faces included with WatchOS 8, Portraits and World Time. Portraits is going to get all the attention, but World Time is the one I've stuck with. Portraits suffers because it’s a bit of a pain to set up. You need to choose and add Portrait photos through the Watch app on your phone, rather than from the Watch itself, and if you add more than one photo — 24 in total can be selected — then the Watch face just cycles through them, or you can tap the screen to change the photo.

If you twist the Digital Crown the photo zooms in slightly, but this is not a permanent effect and it reverts to the standard view after a few seconds. I like the choice of layouts for the time, plus the option to add a complication is very welcome. But I find the auto swapping of the photo distracting, and the need to do everything through the Watch app confusing.

Read more