Skip to main content

AMD R9 Nano wattage numbers leak ahead of August release

amd r9 nano shipping performance nano01
IYD.kr
As much as the recent release of AMD’s Fury X high end, high bandwidth memory (HBM) sporting graphic card was a big event, the card that’s generating the most buzz at the moment is the smallest one in that same new range of GPUs – the R9 Nano. Set to make use of the same Fiji chip, but with a much smaller TDP and PCB, it has the potential to be the perfect graphics card for small system builders, so its release is an important one for AMD. The Nano has an expected release date in August, but there may already be a few units out in the wild.

Purportedly – and bear in mind, this is a rumor – those cards have now begun shipping to retailers (per Hexus), so it may not be long until we get our first look at them. We’ll have to wait until the official reviews land to give us a real take on the card, but there are some wattage efficiency numbers floating around that are said to come from embargoed AMD slides.

These numbers and the accompanying images that show the card in the flesh, tell us that it is indeed very small compared to some of the huge performance focused GPUs that we’ve become used to in recent years. It was said to be tested in a system containing an i7-5960x running at 3GHz, with 16GB of DDR4. The benchmark used was Unigine Heaven running at 3840×2180, with no AA or AF, and everything else at extreme.

The numbers given are all related to the size and power draw of the card. While the 290X in the same system was said to deliver 1.6FPS per inch, the Nano managed four FPS per inch. When it came to the TDP, the Nano delivered 0.152 FPS per watt, in comparison to 0.076FPS per watt for the 290x.

Although these numbers are not very conclusive, we should consider that the hardware is in very few hands at the moment. To give us a real verdict on whether this card is a strong performer for its size, TDP  and price point, we’ll need to wait for the full reviews, which will compare it to Nvidia hardware as well as old AMD gear.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is the Evergreen Coordinator for Computing, overseeing a team of writers addressing all the latest how to…
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 vs. AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT: a close call
Two RTX 4070 graphics cards sitting side by side.

Nvidia's new release, the RTX 4070, shakes things up in the GPU market. After a long spell of only releasing overpriced graphics cards, Nvidia seems to have altered its pricing strategy for the RTX 4070. While it's hard to call it cheap, it's certainly affordable, and it offers performance that makes it a good midrange option.

However, Nvidia's latest addition to the ranking of the best graphics cards has an unexpected rival in the previous generation of GPUs. AMD's RX 6950 XT is similarly priced, but can it keep up with the RTX 4070? Check out our benchmarks and find out how these two cards stack up against each other.
Pricing and availability

Read more
Nvidia’s outrageous pricing strategy is exactly why we need AMD and Intel
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 GPU.

If you're finding it hard to keep up with the prices of graphics cards these days, it's not just you. GPUs have been getting pricier with each generation, and Nvidia's latest RTX 40-series is really testing the limits of how much consumers are willing to spend on PC hardware.

Nvidia may have the best GPUs available right now in terms of raw performance, but the way these new GPUs have been priced shows why the role of Intel and AMD is more important than ever.
GPU prices are through the roof

Read more
This AMD GPU from 2021 beats the RX 7900 XTX and the RTX 4080
The AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo graphics card.

An AMD graphics card that launched in 2021 managed to beat both Nvidia's RTX 4080 and AMD's own flagship, the RX 7900 XTX. Surely that would make it one of the best GPUs you could buy right now -- unfortunately, it's much too pricey to be considered worthwhile, and you can't even use it in a regular PC.

The crazy GPU in question is the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo. Thanks to tests performed by a hardware expert, we were able to see it run far outside of its usual environment. Here's how it fared.

Read more