Skip to main content

Why driverless cars are ugly, and how BMW plans to change that

Drawing a BMW isn’t as straightforward as it once was.

Recommended Videos

The company’s stylists need to preserve 92 years of car-building heritage while continuing to move its design language forward, and now there’s a new challenge: adapting it to new technologies like electrification and different levels of computer-aided driving. At least 12 of the models it will launch by 2023 will be entirely electric, including a variant of the next-generation 7 Series, but batteries aren’t keeping Domagoj Dukec, the firm’s head of design, up at night. The much taller hurdle is autonomous driving.

“Electrification doesn’t have a very big impact on how you design a car. The sensors needed for autonomous driving have a bigger influence [on the design process],” he told Digital Trends. Driving through Silicon Valley illustrates his point. On one hand, battery technology gives designers the freedom to experiment with new shapes and styles because a motor is more compact than a comparable four-, six-, or eight-cylinder engine. On the other hand, the countless driverless prototypes lugging more computing power than a 747 look like four-wheeled Dalmatians. Why is that?

Leveling up

Integrating hardware in a neat and elegant manner gets more difficult as companies move up on the automation scale. Level three technology, which corresponds to a system that lets drivers take their eyes off the road in certain conditions, requires a lidar BMW can integrate into its twin-kidney grille and sensors it can hide behind painted surfaces. It’s relatively discreet; you might not know the technology is there if you see the car from 100 yards away.

The number of sensors needed to power a level four system, which automates driving most of the time, is multiplied by two or three, and some can’t be easily hidden. The car has to know exactly what’s around it at all times, figure out how it’s going to get around a parked delivery van, tell the difference between a dog and a traffic cone, and learn new tricks on-the-fly. Wrapping this technology in a marketable package is certainly feasible, but it adds cost to a technology that, while not available commercially in 2020, promises to be extremely expensive when it arrives.

Will customers bite? That’s one of the important questions Dukec and his team want to answer.

“How many people will go for it? And, will they be willing to make a compromise on design? For 100,000 euros, do you buy a car for its design, or because you can drive fully autonomously in certain circumstances? This is still something we don’t know,” he told me.

Uncertainty has never stopped BMW from blazing a new path; take a look at the i3, which made its debut before electric cars were cool and government-mandated, if you don’t believe me. Its engineers are busily developing level three and level four technology, I took a ride in one of its 7 Series-based prototypes (shown above) in 2019, and Dukec’s team of designers will decide the best way to integrate the required hardware when the time comes.

Time is on the company’s side. The production version of the electric iNext concept is expected to make its debut before the end of 2020. It will be optionally available with level three technology (the type that’s easy to integrate) thanks in part to an in-car 5G connection that Samsung is helping BMW embed into its cars. Engineers will use the yet-unnamed SUV as a test mule to put level four technology through its paces, but the feature isn’t expected to end up in customer hands until much later in the 2020s. By then, the technology will have undoubtedly advanced, and it might be easier to integrate in a clean, seamless fashion. Dukec and his team are already working on it.

“We have found some solutions where we can live with it, though it, of course, has an effect on the design. Nobody can predict the future. We are prepared for it, but we have to see how all these things are going to unfold,” he concluded.

Ronan Glon
Ronan Glon is an American automotive and tech journalist based in southern France. As a long-time contributor to Digital…
2024 Dodge Charger Daytona reinvents the muscle car for the EV era
Front three quarter view of the 2024 Dodge Charger Daytona coupe.

Dodge is finally getting into the EV game, and what better way to start than with a new version of the Charger? While seemingly tailor-made for an electric car, the Charger name also carries the weight of heritage. That led Dodge to take a very different approach with its first EV.

Arriving later this year (with pricing to be determined), the 2024 Dodge Charger Daytona is the replacement for the old gasoline Charger sedan and Dodge Challenger coupe. It tries to appeal to fans of those cars with retro styling, muscle-car sound effects, and an emphasis on performance over efficiency. And if that doesn’t work, Dodge plans to sell a gasoline version as well.
A design straight out of the 1960s

Read more
Here’s how Ford will give EV customers Tesla Supercharger access
Ford EVs at a Tesla Supercharger station.

Ford announced last year that it would adopt the Tesla North American Charging Standard (NACS) for EV fast charging, granting Ford drivers access to the Tesla Supercharger network. Now, the automaker is providing a little more detail on exactly how that will work.

In the original May 2023 announcement, Ford said owners of existing EVs — which use the Combined Charging Standard (CCS) instead of NACS — would be able to charge at Supercharger stations via an adapter. Today, the automaker announced that the adapter developed by Tesla is now available to order. EV owners can order one free adapter per vehicle through Ford's website between now and June 30. The adapter will otherwise retail for $230. Ford plans to begin building new vehicles with NACS connectors in the near future.

Read more
Some on Apple’s failed car project reportedly had a cruel name for it
Apple Fifth Avenue Store Apple Logo

Apple reportedly canceled its electric car project earlier this week, ending around a decade of research and development on the ambitious project.

While we knew the tech giant had spent billions on its efforts, a New York Times report on Wednesday put a precise figure on it: $10 billion. It’s an astonishing amount of money for a project that will never see the light of day, and even more so when you consider that many of those working on it apparently suspected that the endeavor would come to nothing.

Read more