Skip to main content

Uber’s car did not recognize pedestrian in fatal Arizona crash, report says

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) released a preliminary report regarding the fatal crash in Tempe, Arizona, involving an Uber self-driving car and a pedestrian pushing a bicycle.

The preliminary report presents the data the NTSB has gathered since the March 18 crash. The report does not analyze the data nor does it discuss probable cause.

Recommended Videos

The modified 2017 Volvo XC90‘s computer-controlled Uber self-driving system was engaged at the time of the crash. The pedestrian struck by the Volvo was fatally injured while the human operator in the vehicle at the time of the accident was uninjured.

According to the NTSB report, the pedestrian, dressed in dark clothing and pushing a bicycle, did not look in the direction of the oncoming Uber vehicle “until just before impact.” The pedestrian stepped into a section of the road with no direct illumination. Signs at the point where the pedestrian started to cross the road warned pedestrians to use a crosswalk 360 feet distant. Toxicology test results of the pedestrian after the crash were positive for marijuana and methamphetamine.

The bicycle also had no side reflectors. The front and rear reflectors and headlamp were perpendicular to the oncoming vehicle as the pedestrian pushed the bicycle across the road.

The 2017 Volvo was equipped with factory driver assistance features including automatic braking, driver alert detection, and road sign detectors. The factory assistance features are disengaged when the Uber self-driving system controls the modified Volvo.

The NTSB report stated that, according to Uber, the self-driving system is designed to rely on the vehicle operator to take action when needed, but the system does not alert the operator.

The Uber self-driving system modifications on the Volvo included forward- and side-facing cameras, radars, light detection and ranging (lidar), navigation sensors, and an integrated computing and data storage unit.

According to the report, the self-driving system’s radar and lidar detected the pedestrian six seconds before impact. At that moment, the vehicle was traveling 43 mph.

The vehicle’s self-driving software classified the pedestrian first as an unknown object, then as a vehicle, and finally as a bicycle. At that point, just 1.3 seconds before impact, the system registered the need for emergency braking. The vehicle operator moved the steering wheel less than a second before and engaged the brakes less than a second after the crash.

The operator told the NTSB she was monitoring the self-driving system before the crash. She also said her business and personal cell phones were in the car, but she did not use them until after the accident.

The NTSB is continuing to gather information on all aspects of the fatal crash, including the Uber self-driving system, the Volvo’s operator interface, the operator, the operator’s cell phones, the pedestrian, and the road.

On Wednesday, May 23, Uber announced it is ceasing its self-driving program in Arizona. The company will continue its testing in existing programs in Pittsburgh and San Francisco.

Bruce Brown
Digital Trends Contributing Editor Bruce Brown is a member of the Smart Homes and Commerce teams. Bruce uses smart devices…
Officers confused as they pull over an empty self-driving car
Cruise

In what appears to be the first incident of its kind, police officers recently pulled over a self-driving car with no one inside it.

The incident, which took place on a street in San Francisco earlier this month, was caught on video by a passing pedestrian. It shows several traffic cops pondering about how to handle the incident after stopping the vehicle for failing to have its front lights on while driving at night.

Read more
How a big blue van from 1986 paved the way for self-driving cars
Lineup of all 5 Navlab autonomous vehicles.

In 1986, a blue Chevy van often cruised around the streets of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania near Carnegie Mellon University. To the casual observer, nothing about it appeared out of the ordinary. Most people would pass by it without noticing the camcorder peeking out from its roof, or the fact that there were no hands on the steering wheel.

But if any passerby had stopped to inspect the van and peer into its interior, they would have realized it was no ordinary car. This was the world's first self-driving automobile: A pioneering work of computer science and engineering somehow built in a world where fax machines were still the predominant way to send documents, and most phones still had cords. But despite being stuck in an era where technology hadn't caught up to humanity's imagination quite yet, the van -- and the researchers crammed into it -- helped to lay the groundwork for all the Teslas, Waymos, and self-driving Uber prototypes cruising around our streets in 2022.

Read more
Watch folks react to their first ride in GM Cruise’s driverless car
Two people taking their first ride in an autonomous car.

General Motors autonomous car unit, Cruise, has started to offer driverless rides to residents of San Francisco as it moves toward the launch of a full-fledged robo-taxi service.

Following a test run of the service last week, Cruise has released a video (below) showing the reaction of the very first passengers as they rode through the streets of the Californian city in a vehicle that had nobody behind the wheel.

Read more