Skip to main content

AMD slips up as leak indicates its Vega GPUs are coming ‘this quarter’

AMD Ryzen™ Plus Vega
AMD has made some waves lately with its new Zen architecture and Ryzen processors, offering a line of CPUs with competitive performance to Intel’s Core processors and even more competitive pricing. Now, AMD fans are waiting for the company to make its next move by introducing its next generation Vega GPUs.

Until now, AMD hasn’t provided any information on when Vega might be officially introduced, leaving gamers waiting impatiently for stronger competition with Nvidia’s Pascal architecture. Today, however, it looks like AMD might have let the cat out of the bag, with its AMD Poland Facebook page indicating that Vega will arrive this quarter, as Wccftech.com reports.

wccftech.com

Of course, it’s entirely possible that someone at AMD Poland spoke out of turn, and so this information should be considered unverified at this point. But there’s other information that seems to confirm an imminent release, such as a Vega GPU showing in CompuBench benchmark results — something that usually happens shortly before a new component is released.

In addition, AMD has now provided Vega OpenGL support for Linux, and the company has apparently devoted 80 percent of its driver engineers to Vega optimization for the past few months. Simply put, while nobody knows when Vega will arrive, there’s plenty of evidence to suggest that it’s going to show up in gaming PCs sooner rather than later.

By the CompuBench results, Vega will offer at least competitive performance compared to the Nvidia GTX 1080 but significantly lower than the GTX 1080 Ti. Without knowing where in the Vega line the tested GPU is positioned, we don’t know if that’s low-end, midrange, or high-end Vega performance. Nevertheless, AMD fans should have some tantalizing options to choose from.

AMD 687F:C1 GTX 1080 Ti
Catmull-Clark Subdivision Level 3: 81.251 mTriangles/s 245.95 mTriangles/s
Catmull-Clark Subdivision Level 5: 239.511 mTriangles/s 353.415 mTriangles/s
Subsurface Scattering multiple view: 6,262.991 mSamples/s 9,610.488 mSamples/s
TV-L1 Optical Flow: 56.729 mPixels/s 64.918 mPixels/s
Level Set Segmentation – 128: 10,281.757 mVoxels/s N/A
Level Set Segmentation – 256: 10,844.834 mVoxels/s N/A

AMD recently released a new Radeon RX 500 Series of GPUs based on its current Polaris generation, and so anyone who wants decent AMD gaming performance without spending serious money has that option to consider. But otherwise, it’s looking like anyone planning on a truly high-end gaming experience won’t have too long to wait before they’ll be able to look outside of Nvidia’s lineup when choosing their next GPU.

Mark Coppock
Mark has been a geek since MS-DOS gave way to Windows and the PalmPilot was a thing. He’s translated his love for…
AMD finally shares new RX 7900 XTX benchmarks, and it’s not all good news
AMD;s RX 7900 XTX sitting with the die.

AMD was light on performance data when it announced its upcoming RX 7900 XTX graphics card a couple of weeks back. It wasn't that AMD didn't share numbers -- the presentation was packed with them -- but that they were all from uncommon resolutions, esports titles that don't stress the best graphics cards, or veiled by FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) upscaling. AMD is finally ready to share more information, giving us a better idea of how the new flagship will stack up -- and there's good and bad news.

The company shared performance data for the RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT in four games: Resident Evil Village, Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2, Cyberpunk 2077, and Watch Dogs: Legion. The data suggests the RX 7900 XTX could be competitive with even the Nvidia RTX 4090 in some titles. But the RX 7900 XT, despite being close in price to the flagship model, shows a wide performance gap.

Read more
The 6 worst AMD GPUs of all time
AMD Radeon RX 6500XT graphics cards stacked on top of each other.

AMD has been one of the top graphics cards manufacturers for well over a decade after picking up the even-longer-standing ATI. Overall, it's done pretty well for itself. However, AMD (and ATI) has also made several disappointing graphics cards over the years and  GPUs that can barely justify their own existence.

If you'd like to take a trip down memory lane and wince at all AMD's missteps, here's a look back at the AMD and ATI GPUs that let us all down.
Radeon 8500
Crippled by bad drivers

Read more
AMD says its next GPU will have more than just blazing speed
AMD Radeon RX 6900 graphics card hovers over an AMD red and black background.

A recent blog post from AMD was a reminder that speed isn’t the only consideration when building a gaming PC or graphics workstation. Power requirements for computers have increased significantly over the last few years, with both CPUs and GPUs drawing more to keep up with the demands of fast-paced and graphically-rich, modern games. As video quality and photo sizes increase, editing puts a heavier load on the system as well.

AMD's top competitor, Nvidia, tends to make GPUs with greater power demands. AMD's blog makes the case that speed doesn’t have to come at the expense of efficiency. Its current GPUs use RDNA 2, which features an improved performance-per-watt that's 50% better than that of GCN, the previous architecture.

Read more