Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

No one is buying AMD’s new Zen 5 CPUs, and it’s painfully obvious why

The Ryzen 9 9900X sitting on its box.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

AMD’s new Ryzen 5 9600X and Ryzen 7 9700X, which were aimed at claiming a spot among the best processors, are off to a rocky start. According to early sales numbers from German retailer Mindfactory, the number of new AMD CPUs the website has shipped is only in the double digits, despite being on the market for nearly a week.

Mindfactory is only one retailer, but it actually displays the number of products it sold on its website. The Ryzen 5 9600X has seen over 20 sales, while the Ryzen 7 9700X has had over 30. You can see the lack of enthusiasm for Zen 5 CPUs elsewhere, though. On Amazon’s bestsellers page, the last-gen Ryzen 7 7800X3D ranks in the first spot. The first Zen 5 CPU on the list, the Ryzen 7 9700X, is in 47th place.

Recommended Videos

At this point, it’s fairly obvious why these CPUs aren’t off to a great start. As you can see in our Ryzen 9 9950X and Ryzen 9 9900X review, AMD’s latest CPUs provide barely any increase in gaming performance. They’re often beat by Intel’s competing Core i9-14900K, and AMD’s own Ryzen 7 7800X3D runs away with gaming performance. Even in productivity apps, where the gains are more pronounced, AMD still doesn’t dominate across workloads.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

The big problem for the Ryzen 5 9600X and Ryzen 7 9700X is AMD’s 3D V-Cache tech. Given the slim performance gains, most users are probably waiting to see what chips like the Ryzen 7 9800X3D have to offer. That’s what we saw in the previous generation. Even months after releasing, AMD’s initial batch of Zen 4 CPUs saw terrible sales.

It doesn’t help that these last-gen CPUs are much cheaper now, too. Despite cutting the launch price of the Zen 5 range, AMD’s Zen 4 CPUs are still around $100 cheaper across the board.

Over time, AMD’s new Zen 5 options will drop in price and they’ll become the go-to options once Zen 4 stock has slowly disappeared from store shelves. At the moment, however, it doesn’t look like the CPUs are wildly popular. Although 3D V-Cache has been a huge boon to AMD’s gaming dominance, it’s also led to a level of segmentation within AMD’s lineup that’s not the easiest to navigate.

We expect 3D V-Cache versions of Ryzen 9000 CPUs some time in early 2025, but AMD hasn’t announced a release date yet. By that point, I suspect sales for Zen 5 CPUs will be in a much different spot.

Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
Pour one out — AMD is reportedly sunsetting the Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Someone holding the Ryzen 7 5800X3D in a red light.

The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is a certified legend, sitting among the best processors you can buy several years after its release. It was the swan song for the AM4 socket and Zen 3 architecture, and it debuted AMD's 3D V-Cache that has turned gaming CPUs on their heads. But it looks like the processor is finally meeting its end.

AMD hasn't said anything official, but PCGamesHardware went as far as to say that "the Ryzen 7 5800X3D is dead," and it's easy to see why. PCGamesHardware is a German outlet, and in that region of the world, the Ryzen 7 5800X3D isn't available. The same is true in the U.S. The processor isn't available on Amazon, and on Newegg, I found one third-party seller shipping the CPU from Israel for $500. It should go without saying at this point, but $500 is way too much for the Ryzen 7 5800X3D in 2024.

Read more
Intel is bringing back one of its most frustrating types of CPUs
Intel Core Ultra Series 2 Lunar Lake chipset.

Intel's new Arrow Lake CPUs are a big deal. They utilize an entirely new architecture and come with a new socket, which will help them compete for a spot among the best processors. However, it looks like some upcoming Core 200-series CPUs (the non-Ultra versions) might not use the Arrow Lake/Lunar Lake architecture at all -- they might be rebranded CPUs sporting older CPU tech.

The assumption comes from results in the Crossmark benchmark that were posted to Bapco and first pointed out by Everest on X (formerly Twitter). The result shows the Core 5 210H, but it's not the performance that's interesting. It's the specs. The result shows that the CPU comes with eight cores and 12 threads. That's the rub. Arrow Lake and Lunar Lake don't come with Hyper-Threading, so each core only comes with a single thread.

Read more
Sorry, gamers — Intel’s new CPUs won’t deliver any gains
A render for an Intel Arrow Lake CPU.

Intel is setting expectations for its upcoming Arrow Lake-S desktop CPUs. Although the company is holding strong that the new generation will be competitive with the best processors when they release on October 24, the new range of CPUs won't deliver much, if any, performance gains for gamers -- and that's coming from Intel itself.

To kick off the Arrow Lake generation, now called Intel Core Ultra 200S, Intel is releasing five processors. You can see the standard Core Ultra 9, 7, and 5 models in the table below, along with Core Ultra 7 and 5 models that cut the integrated graphics for a slightly lower price. All five of the processors are unlocked for overclocking with the new LGA 1851 socket. Unlike AMD's new Zen 5 CPUs, Core Ultra 200S chips require a new motherboard as Intel retires its LGA 1700 socket.

Read more