Skip to main content

Can Microsoft buy Activision? Here’s what may kill the deal

On an unassuming Tuesday following a national holiday, Microsoft dropped a bombshell. And yes, this situation qualifies as a bombshell. Microsoft announced that it planned to purchase Activision Blizzard with cash for $68.7 billion — the largest cash acquisition ever.

That’s ever — period, not just for Microsoft, the gaming industry, or even tech companies as a whole. While everyone is still digesting the news, one question has popped up: Will the deal actually go through?

Recommended Videos

We have some recent historical context. There will be a lot of bumps over the next few years, and although the Microsoft and Activision Blizzard deal may eventually close, the companies have a long way to get there.

Will Microsoft be able to buy Activision Blizzard?

Activision Blizzard's logo with multiple IPs shown underneath.
Microsoft’s acquisition brings Call of Duty, Overwatch, and more under its umbrella.

We don’t know right now. There isn’t a history of deals like this, neither for Microsoft nor Activision Blizzard, and it marks the largest purchase Microsoft has ever made. We can speculate, but the reality is that we won’t know if the acquisition will go through until the final papers are signed.

Right now, there’s a similar deal in limbo: Nvidia’s $40 billion purchase of chipmaker ARM. In the tech industry at least, this is the second-largest acquisition of the 2020s so far, only sitting behind Microsoft’s deal with Activision Blizzard.

The Nvidia deal has been passed around to regulators around the world for two years now, eventually climaxing in December 2021 when the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sued Nvidia. Now, analysts project that the deal is dead.

Nvidia’s deal is worth $40 billion, while the Microsoft acquisition is worth $68.7 billion. So, case closed, right? Unfortunately, there’s more to the story than that.

For Nvidia and Arm, there’s a compelling argument that the deal could stifle competition and further consolidate the already narrow chip-making market. In the world of game development, even indie publishers like Devolver Digital have built businesses worth $1 billion or more. The competition is still thriving.

Activision's logo on a black billboard.

The argument for Nvidia and Arm doesn’t apply to Microsoft and Activision Blizzard. Unlike Nvidia, Microsoft doesn’t compete with Activision Blizzard’s customers. In games, at least, the deal checks out.

But the deal is about more than games. Microsoft made it clear that it also touches mobile and cloud, and the company said that it “provide[s] building blocks for the metaverse.”

That’s not to mention that this is an unprecedented acquisition. Reuters reports it’s the largest cash acquisition ever, not just in gaming or tech, and David Wagner, an analyst at Aptus Capital Advisors, said that it “will get a lot of looks from a regulatory standpoint.”

Looks are the problem. In the months leading up to Microsoft’s announcement, Activision Blizzard has faced some of the harshest scrutiny a company ever has, and with a landmark deal announced, that won’t change soon.

The public eye

Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick.
Bobby Kotick, CEO of Activision Blizzard, has become a focal point of the recent sexual harassment lawsuits.

In July 2021, the state of California sued Activision Blizzard following allegations of sexual harassment. In the months that followed, Activision Blizzard became a touchstone for the larger issues of discrimination and sexual harassment in the gaming industry, with the public eye drawing lawsuits, strikes, and calls for unionization.

The specifics of Activision Blizzard’s troubles over the past six months aren’t relevant for the deal — but the public scrutiny is. Microsoft’s $7 billion Bethesda acquisition brought cries of monopoly; this nearly $70 billion deal is already doing the same.

It doesn’t help that Activision Blizzard became a household name over the past six months. Most of the largest acquisitions take place in the dark, far away from public scrutiny or knowledge. Last year, BHP Group purchased its UK-based trading group for around $86 billion. Who’s BHP Group? That’s kind of the point.

The size of the deal matters, but adding the recently storied history of Activision Blizzard on top of that is sure to draw a lot of attention. Even if regulatory bodies were OK with the deal slipping by, the public outcry would force someone’s hand.

It’s a matter of when, not if. Although Microsoft already announced its plans, we likely have a long road of probes and possibly lawsuits before Microsoft and Activision Blizzard shake hands for the final time. We might not get that until 2024 or later.

Microsoft’s biggest deal to date

The purchase of Activision Blizzard is the largest deal Microsoft has made by a long shot. Mind, this isn’t the largest deal for the Xbox division or for Microsoft gaming; it’s the most money Microsoft has spent acquiring another company period.

Executives standing in front of the Linkedin offices.
Microsoft’s CEO standing in front of the Linkedin offices. Microsoft

The closest Microsoft has ever gotten is when it purchased LinkedIn in 2016 for $26.2 billion. You can dispel any notions about Microsoft not investing in Xbox as a business venture — based on the Activision Blizzard deal, it may be the company’s main focus.

It looks like a good investment, though. Although the public deal is mostly focused on Overwatch, Call of Dutyand the other billion-dollar franchises Activision Blizzard owns, it also has implications for other gaming sectors.

Activision Blizzard owns King, for example, who makes Candy Crush. And Activision Blizzard owns Major League Gaming with exclusive partnerships with platforms like Disney and YouTube. It’s about more than adding Activision Blizzard’s titles to Game Pass.

A live Overwatch League event in an arena.

That might be a problem for the deal to close. With competitive sports, the metaverse, and mobile gaming all wrapped up in the deal, regulators may bring up antitrust issues. Microsoft’s acquisition of LinkedIn already brought a flurry of antitrust allegations. A deal worth three times as much is likely to do the same.

Caught in limbo

Phil Spencer standing in front of a Microsoft Studios logo.

Microsoft says it plans for the deal to close in 2023, but that’s ignoring what will likely be many roadblocks along the way. As for if Microsoft can close, we don’t know right now. Analysts seem optimistic, though cautious, given the scrutiny from regulatory bodies around the world.

Deals like this don’t happen in tech normally. They’re usually reserved for massive oil and energy enterprises, food processors that fill up grocery store shelves, and chemical manufacturers that touch nearly everything.

We don’t know if the deal with Microsoft and Activision Blizzard will close, but one thing’s for sure: This isn’t the last time we’ll hear about it.

Jacob Roach
Senior Staff Writer, Computing
Jacob Roach is a writer covering computing and gaming at Digital Trends. After realizing Crysis wouldn't run on a laptop, he…
FTC files lawsuit to block Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard acquisition
Lilith appears in a Church in Diablo 4.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) will sue Microsoft to block its acquisition of Call of Duty and World of Warcraft publisher Activision Blizzard.
A 3-to-1 vote ultimately determined the FTC's decision to issue the lawsuit as the commission fears that the deal would give Microsoft an unfair advantage in the gaming industry and hurt innovation. FTC Bureau of Competition Director Holly Vedova explained the FTC's intent in a press release.
"Microsoft has already shown that it can and will withhold content from its gaming rivals," she said. "Today, we seek to stop Microsoft from gaining control over a leading independent game studio and using it to harm competition in multiple dynamic and fast-growing gaming markets."
That press release also highlights the FTC's belief that Microsoft's acquisition of ZeniMax Media is problematic due to a track record of "using valuable gaming content to suppress competition from rival consoles." In addition, after the Activision Blizzard acquisition, Microsoft could potentially "harm competition by manipulating Activision’s pricing, degrading Activision’s game quality or player experience on rival consoles and gaming services, changing the terms and timing of access to Activision’s content, or withholding content from competitors entirely."
This $69 billion acquisition has dominated gaming industry headlines all year as Microsoft has been doing all it can to make the deal seem favorable to the industry. As recently as December 6, Head of Xbox Phil Spencer emphasized the potential positives of this acquisition, confirming plans to continue to bring Call of Duty to Nintendo platforms and Steam for 10 years if the Activision Blizzard merger is complete.
By filing this complaint, the FTC begins proceedings that will result in a hearing and trial before an administrative law judge to determine whether or not Microsoft will acquire Activision Blizzard. 

Read more
Microsoft offered Sony a 10-year Call of Duty deal for PlayStation, report says
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2.

Microsoft reportedly offered Sony a deal to keep the Call of Duty franchise on PlayStation for 10 years, according to a report by The New York Times. The tech giant announced its intention to acquire Activision Blizzard earlier this year for almost $70 billion, but the deal has come under intense scrutiny from regulators such as the U.K.'s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and the E.U.'s European Commission.

According to The New York Times, Microsoft said that on November 11 it had made an offer to keep Call of Duty on PlayStation for another decade. However, Sony declined to comment on this specific claim.

Read more
Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard acquisition just hit another hurdle in the U.K.
Phil Spencer standing in front of a Microsoft Studios logo.

Microsoft's nearly $70 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard is under review internationally, and no country takes this matter more seriously than the United Kingdom. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) completed the first phase of its investigation into the deal and is now recommending putting it through a second phase.

The call for extra scrutiny into the deal between Microsoft and Activision Blizzard stems from the CMA's concern that such a deal may substantially stifle competition in the U.K.'s gaming market. Specifically, it's worried that if and when the merger goes through, Microsoft may make Activision Blizzard's portfolio of games exclusive to Xbox consoles, or make them available on PlayStation and Nintendo systems "on worse terms." It's also concerned that the company may leverage Activision Blizzard's games across console, PC, and cloud systems to harm competition in the growing cloud gaming space.

Read more