Skip to main content

Cheap Shot or Chip Shot? Nvidia Ponders x86 CPUs

Cheap Shot or Chip Shot? Nvidia Ponders x86 CPUs

At an investars’ conference this week, Nvidia sales VP Mike Hara indicated the company is considering developing its own line of x86 CPUs within the next two years, specifically with an eye towards low-cost PCs and mobile devices. Although speculation that Nvidia might get into the CPU business has surfaced a few times since at least 2005, Hara’s comments are the first acknowledgment by the company that it is, in fact, eyeing the CPU space.

If Nvidia were to develop its own line of x86 CPUs, it would put the company in even more direct competition with rival Intel, which whom it already has a testy relationship. Intel has recently sued Nvidia over terms of a chip licensing agreement, and Nvidia executives have been very publicly denigrating Intel’s integrated graphics solutions—even going so far as to roll out their own Ion platform to replace Intel’s integrated graphics on Atom processors.

Nvidia’s focus on the low-end and mobile markets makes sense, even though netbooks and some other mobile computing products carry notoriously low margins. As Intel and other chipmakers evolve their mobile and low-end CPU platforms, they will logically integrate graphics controllers directly into their CPUs to improve performance and reduce manufacturing costs, effectively shutting a third party maker like Nvidia out of the market. By developing its own x86 CPU, Nvidia can offer a competing solution and bring its graphics know-how to bear.

Intel’s recent announcement that it will be outsourcing production of some of its Atom processors to TSMC may also be an indicator of Nvidia’s strategy with its own processor: Nvidia is also a TSMC customer; in theory, if they used TSMC to manufacturer their own x86 solutions, they would at least have production process parity with Intel’s own products.

Of course, Nvidia’s not-really-an-announcement could also be a move in the wider posturing between Nvidia and Intel, perhaps to put more pressure on Intel to engineer future products so mobile device makers can have a selection of graphics options—including third party GPUs.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Intel Core i5 12400F vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: Affordable CPUs, compared
AMD Ryzen 9 3900x pins.

As exciting as the new Intel Alder Lake 12600K and 12900K CPUs are, most gamers don't need anything quite so powerful. The more affordable Core-i5 models are likely to be the standouts of their generation, which is why the debut of the Core i5-12400F is so exciting. This more economical, six-core processor is designed to go head to head with AMD's Ryzen 5600X hexacore design, with a much lower price tag.

Here's how they stack in a battle of the best bang for buck gaming CPUs in early 2022.
Specs

Read more
Intel Core i5-12600K vs. AMD Ryzen 5 5600X: Midrange CPUs, compared
12900K processor sitting on a table.

There's an understandable excitement around comparisons of top chips, like the Intel Core i9-12900K vs. AMD Ryzen 5950X, but for most CPU buyers, the midrange is much more important. That's where the real value is found, and the most pressing head-to-head comparison right now is between the Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 5600X.

Can those new efficiency cores and an enhanced Intel process make the 12600K better than the 5600X? Let's find out.
Pricing and availability

Read more
Intel Core i9-12900K vs. AMD Ryzen 9 5950X: Flagship CPUs, tested
Pins on Core i9-12900K.

Intel's 12th-gen Alder Lake processors are ushering in a new era of desktop computing. It's the first time we're seeing a hybrid architecture from a slot-in CPU, and it marks a shift in leadership at Intel. Still, a big red glow hangs over Intel's flagship Core i9-12900K -- and it comes from the Ryzen 9 5950X.

Both the Core i9-12900K and Ryzen 9 5950X are 16-core processors that are top of class in their respective product ranges, and they're among the best processors you can buy. To find out which one is better, we put both chips through a gauntlet of benchmarks and comparisons. And although there's a lot to talk about, one chip is clearly better than the other.

Read more