Skip to main content

Google Says (Index) Size Doesn’t Matter

Online search engine Google turned seven years old today (quick, check out the birthday cake on its home page logo!), and announced that it has tripled the number of Web pages that its system can search. The announcement is undoubtedly intended to steal some thunder back from rival Yahoo which recently upstaged Google by claiming to search a substantially larger volume of Web pages.

Google has consistently disputed Yahoo’s claim, saying its own internal testing of Yahoo’s search and third-party examinations were unable to substantiate Yahoo’s claims. But, tomato, tomahto—Google doesn’t want to play anymore! Now Google’s director of consumer Web products, Marissa Mayer, says a figure representing the number of documents included in a search engine index is "no longer useful," Nonetheless, Google’s quick to point out that, even though numbers aren’t useful anymore, they’ve just made their index a whole lot bigger. According to Google engineer Anna Patterson, Google’s "newly expanded web search index that is 1,000 times the size of our original index" and is "more than 3 times larger than any other search engine." Not that they’re counting or anything.

Recommended Videos

It’s easy to understand the point that the sheer number of pages searched isn’t particularly useful: just because a search a greater number of pages doesn’t mean those results are relevant or helpful; instead, the quality and sort order of the results are often more important than the sheer number of hits.

Instead of comparing the total number of documents alleged to be included in a search index, Google encourages users to evaluate the relevance of the results they receive from the search engines, particularly on obscure terms and queries which produce fewer than 1,000 results. According to Mayer, that’s where Google’s newly-tripled index is likely to produce more-relevant results than its competitors.

Let’s see: "geoff duncan" +millionaire +lottery… hmmph. Clearly they haven’t found everything.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Intel surprise launched a new graphics card, but it doesn’t make any sense
The Intel logo on the Arc A770 graphics card.

Intel's Arc A580 graphics card is finally here, but we're not sure if it's ready to compete against some of the best GPUs out right now. In fact, based on the reviews, it is ill-prepared to face the current GPU market. What went wrong? It's not even about the performance, even though it leaves a lot to be desired. It's mostly that it seems this GPU makes little sense to buy compared to the competition, including Intel's own offerings.

It's been a bumpy road for the Intel Arc A580. The rest of the Arc Alchemist lineup, including the flagship Arc A770, launched a year ago after multiple delays. The Arc A580 was announced alongside them, but then, Intel went quiet. Many people thought the card was quietly canceled, but then it resurfaced a few days ago -- and now, it's officially out, with a $180 price tag. We also know the full specs of the GPU.

Read more
Nvidia doesn’t want you to know about its controversial new GPU
Logo on the RTX 4060 Ti graphics card.

Confirming previous rumors, Nvidia released its RTX 4060 Ti on Tuesday without much fanfare. Most of the best graphics cards release with a bang, but the updated 16GB RTX 4060 Ti released with barely a whimper. Nvidia is putting more weight behind Portal: Prelude RTX, on the same day it's launching a new graphics card. Weird.

This is the 16GB variant that Nvidia promised when the original 8GB RTX 4060 Ti was released in June, and although it has technically been released, you can't buy it.

Read more
Samsung’s first flat mini-LED gaming monitor doesn’t come cheap
Samsung's 2023 Odyssey Neo G7 sitting on a table.

After announcing 2023's Odyssey Neo G7 earlier this year, Samsung finally revealed the price for the display. The 43-inch mini-LED monitor runs $1,000, and listings are live now. Unfortunately, it has some stiff competition from the best gaming monitors.

It's a significant size increase over last year's version, jumping from 32 inches to 43 inches while maintaining a 16:9 aspect ratio. Samsung says the panel has a 144Hz refresh rate and 1 millisecond response time, as well as DisplayHDR 600 certification from VESA and Samsung's own HDR10+ certification.

Read more