Skip to main content

Intel admits to one key regret about its launch of Arc GPUs

Intel has confirmed in a recent interview that it plans to finally launch the Arc A770 and Arc A750 graphics cards “very soon.” The flagship is said to be capable of competing against Nvidia’s RTX 3060 Ti.

DF Direct Special: Inside Intel Arc - What's Happening With GPUs, XeSS and Ray Tracing?

Alongside the happy news about an imminent launch date, Intel has also shared its one major regret, and it’s an important one — the launch strategy of Arc Alchemist.

That’s right — it seems that Intel might finally be inching closer to the official launch of its flagship gaming graphics cards. Although the company didn’t share an exact release date, it did reveal a lot about the upcoming GPUs. The information comes from two interviews (courtesy of PC Games Hardware and Digital Foundry) with Intel Arc experts; one with Ryan Shrout and Tom Petersen, and one with Petersen alone.

Petersen and Shrout teased that the Arc A770 Limited Edition graphics card will arrive with 16GB of GDDR6 memory. However, custom versions made by Intel’s board partners will be available in either 16GB or 8GB variants. The Arc A750 will also come with 8GB of memory.

Intel Arc A750M Limited Edition graphics card sits on a desk.
Intel

Some of the GPUs made by Intel’s partners will come with a factory overclock that will increase their power limits. Much the way it goes for Nvidia and AMD, this should boost the performance of these GPUs above what Intel itself is offering.

Intel expects to be able to trade blows with Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GPU, at least where the flagship A770 is concerned. The A750 is being set up as a competitor to the RTX 3060 instead. Earlier on in the development, there have been many rumors about the A770 being able to rival the RTX 3070, but Intel seems to have given up on that idea.

The issue of resizable base address register (also known as ReBAR) was also brought up. Petersen remained candid as he recommended that Intel Arc graphics cards should be used with newer systems that support ReBAR. Using one of Intel’s GPUs on an older system that doesn’t support this technology might result in an up to 40% drop in performance. This won’t be fixed for Intel Arc, but Intel hopes to mitigate this in its next-gen offerings.

Full Interview with Intel about Arc GPUs: Performance, Pricing, XeSS, ReBAR, DirectStorage, Drivers

We’ve already heard from many sources, including Intel itself, that the performance of Arc GPUs may not blow our minds. Petersen admitted that this might not change by saying that the Arc A-Series “can’t really change dramatically on performance.” With that said, Intel continues to commit to its idea to beat the competition with pricing. Unfortunately, we still don’t know how much the GPUs will cost, so it’s hard to know how much Intel means business here.

Intel’s honest approach continues throughout both interviews, revealing a regret about a key part of the launch strategy — releasing the Arc A380 only in China at first. Intel admits that this didn’t work out the way it had planned; media outlets were not so eager to ship whole systems from China just to test Intel’s new GPU, so the card received very little coverage. In addition, Petersen admitted that the massive delays in launching Intel Arc didn’t result from supply constraints — Intel simply wasn’t ready to release the graphics cards just yet.

There’s plenty more to learn from the two interviews, so make sure to give them a watch if you want to know more. Intel’s candid approach continues to be refreshing, but will the competitive pricing be enough to put these graphics cards on our list of the best GPUs of the year? We will have to wait and see.

Monica J. White
Monica is a UK-based freelance writer and self-proclaimed geek. A firm believer in the "PC building is just like expensive…
How much does Intel Arc cost? Arc Alchemist buying guide
Intel Arc A770 GPU installed in a test bench.

Intel Arc Alchemist, also known as Intel's first serious venture into discrete graphics for gamers, is finally here. While the GPUs can't hope to compete with some of AMD's and Nvidia's best graphics cards, they can stand their own ground in the midrange market, and they're priced very competitively to make up for the fact that they won't replace your new RTX 4090 or even your old RTX 3080.

Intel's lineup right now includes the flagship Arc A770, which is supposed to be available with either 8GB or 16GB memory. Then, there's the Arc A750 and the entry-level Arc A380. Below, we'll explore their pricing, availability, and, most importantly, which one is worth spending your money on.
How much does the Intel Arc A770 cost?

Read more
Does ray tracing work on the Intel Arc GPUs?
The backs of the Arc A770 and Arc A750 graphics cards.

Intel is the newest player in the GPU market now that the company has finally launched its Arc Alchemist GPUs. Since these are first-generation products from a company that has almost no experience in making desktop-grade graphics, you might wonder if GPUs like the Arc A770 and A750 support modern features like ray tracing.

Intel Arc does in fact support ray tracing, just like AMD and Nvidia does, and the performance might even surprise you.
Does ray tracing work on Intel Arc?

Read more
Arc GPU drivers are getting better, but Intel says it’s challenging
Intel head of Graphics Raja Koduri explains Arc driver troubles

Intel Arc A770 and A750 graphics cards will be available to order on October 12, but Intel admitted it’s still struggling with drivers for DirectX games. Raja Koduri, Intel’s head of Accelerated Computing Systems and Graphics Group (AXG), discussed the challenges in a recent interview.

With reviews expected to start arriving today, the pressure is on Intel to either impress us with its recovery or rush to solve issues quickly. Intel has been creating graphics drivers for decades, but until this year, that has focused on integrated graphics built into the CPU, which come with much lower expectations. Koduri explained that the first generation of Arc GPUs was most difficult because programmers had to start with a completely new architecture. Pandemic challenges slowed development as well. Heading into the second generation it should be better.

Read more