Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Intel Arc is finally here, and it’s cheaper than AMD and Nvidia

Today marks a huge step in the history of Intel Arc — the first discrete Arc GPU is now available for backorder. The entry-level Arc A380 showed up on Newegg, priced well below similar offerings from Nvidia and AMD.

The version of the card that appeared on the U.S. market is one we haven’t seen before. Is it actually worth buying?

ASRock Challenger Arc A380 Intel Arc GPU.
ASRock

After multiple delays, the first step for Intel Arc has finally been made — the desktop version of the card is starting to have some availability outside of China. The first model to appear for sale is the A380, a GPU that’s expected to rival some of Nvidia’s and AMD’s budget graphics cards, such as the GTX 1650 or the Radeon RX 6400.

Surprisingly, it’s not Intel’s own version of the A380 that made it to market, but a custom flavor prepared by ASRock. Thus far, we’ve only ever seen the Intel edition of Arc A380 and the Gunnir Arc A380 that even received its own water cooling attachment a little later on. Both of these are still yet to be seen, but you can now pick up the .

The graphics card sports a single fan, which should provide more than enough cooling for a card like this. It has a TDP of 75 watts and comes with one 8-pin power connector. It runs the full ACM-G11 GPU, complete with 8 Xe cores and 6GB of memory across a 96-bit bus. The addition of four display connectors is a welcome surprise, but we’re only getting one HDMI 2.0b aside from the three DisplayPort 2.0 connectors.

Comparing the price of the ASRock Challenger to similar Nvidia and AMD offerings reveals that Intel seems to be staying true to its promise of being price competitive. Just yesterday, the approximate pricing of Intel’s better GPUs (the flagship A770 and the A750) was quietly revealed, and those models also seem to be quite affordable. While we’re still in the realm of speculation about the A770 and the A750, we know for a fact that the A380 is cheaper than its AMD and Nvidia rivals.

ASRock Intel Arc A380 GPU ports.
ASRock

Looking at Newegg, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 can be found for around $190-$240, while the AMD Radeon RX 6400 is priced lower at around $150-$200. If we go one step higher and check the RX 6500, the price hovers around $190-$240. All of these are more expensive than the new Intel Arc.

Now, the question is: Should you buy the Arc A380 or pay a little extra for a tried-and-true solution in the form of AMD and Nvidia? It’s hard to say. Performance-wise, it’s clear that Intel still has some driver optimization to work on, but in a budget system, the Arc A380 should do well enough.

Although the early reviews of Arc A380 were not very promising, a long time has passed since then, and things may have improved. While the Arc A380 will not be one of the best graphics cards, it very well might be a viable option if you just want to put something together while keeping the costs low.

Monica J. White
Monica is a UK-based freelance writer and self-proclaimed geek. A firm believer in the "PC building is just like expensive…
AMD RX 7900 XTX vs. Nvidia RTX 4090: the ultimate flagship GPU battle
RX 7900 XTX lying on a textured background.

AMD's latest Radeon RX 7000-series is Team Red's response to Nvidia's RTX 40-series. For Nvidia, the current reigning leader of the pack is the RTX 4090, an expensive, but immensely powerful GPU. In the case of AMD, we have two cards sitting near the top -- the RX 7900 XT and the RX 7900 XTX. How does AMD's new headliner, the XTX, compete with Nvidia's flagship?

If you're wondering which GPU will reign as the best of the best, you've come to the right place. We've tested both cards extensively and we know the answer.
Pricing and availability

Read more
Nvidia RTX 4060 Ti might repeat the same mistake as the RTX 4090
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 is shown along with a hand holding the power cable adapter.

New leaks regarding the rumored RTX 4060 Ti have left many PC gaming enthusiasts scratching their heads. Not only does the GPU sound pretty unimpressive so far, but it also shows Nvidia's commitment to one strange choice -- the 12-pin power connector. Yes, the exact same one that's been getting so much bad press recently.

Seeing this bizarre decision makes me wonder -- is Nvidia's commitment to the high-end part of the market really the right way to go?
A lukewarm response
https://twitter.com/kopite7kimi/status/1602761028584247298

Read more
What power supply do you need for the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX?
Radeon logo on the RX 7900 XTX.

Upgrading your graphics card can sometimes mean upgrading your power supply too, especially if it's one of the latest generations of flagship cards, like the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX. If you want to make sure everything's smooth and stable, it's best to check whether your current PSU can handle the upgrades provided by AMD's new range of GPUs, dubbed RDNA 3 or Radeon RX 7000.

So far, the new GPU range only has two cards: the RX 7900 XTX and the 7900 XT. Out of those two, the RX 7900 XTX is the one that consumes the most power. Even then, it's still fairly conservative when compared to the Nvidia flagship, the RTX 4090. In Nvidia's case, the Founders Edition has a total board power (TBP) of 450 watts and calls for an 850-watt PSU. However, some of Nvidia's board partners that made custom versions of the GPU require a much beefier PSU, reaching as high as 1,200 watts.

Read more