Skip to main content

Intel comments on Windows 8 were ‘factually inaccurate,’ Microsoft says

Windows 8You may have read yesterday about some comments made by an Intel exec about how the four planned ARM versions of Windows 8 won’t support “legacy” apps, which is to say they won’t be backwards compatible with applications from earlier Windows operating systems. Microsoft has now responded with an official statement calling the Intel comments “factually inaccurate and unfortunately misleading,” no surprise given that the only actual confirmed fact about Windows 8 support for ARM processors is that it will exist.

Microsoft’s comments on the matter: “Intel’s statements during yesterday’s Intel Investor Meeting about Microsoft’s plans for the next version of Windows were factually inaccurate and unfortunately misleading. From the first demonstrations of Windows on SoC, we have been clear about our goals and have emphasized that we are at the technology demonstration stage. As such, we have no further details or information at this time.”

Unfortunately, the response is vague enough that it’s hard to say exactly which points Microsoft is refuting. Intel essentially revealed that there are four versions of Windows 8 in development for ARM processors alone, and that these releases will only support applications developed from the ground up for ARM-based devices. Really though, as Microsoft says, Windows 8 is currently at the tech demo stage. Until official reveals are rolled out from the source, it’s probably best to disregard information like this, especially when it comes from a company that is in direct competition with ARM.

Just to be clear, the mobile device market is what an ARM version of Windows would cater to. So Intel’s comments aren’t entirely without merit. Reports have previously suggested that multiple versions of Windows 8 are in development, including some that are built for an ARM architecture. No one doubts that Microsoft will have different price points for Windows 8 with feature sets that cater to different markets and consumer/business buyers. That’s just how the company rolls.

Editors' Recommendations

Adam Rosenberg
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Previously, Adam worked in the games press as a freelance writer and critic for a range of outlets, including Digital Trends…
Microsoft Surface Pro 9 vs. Surface Pro 8: here’s how they stack up
Microsoft Surface Pro 9 front view showing tablet and videoconferencing.

The Microsoft Surface Pro has spent years on our best laptops and best 2-in-1s lists. The Surface Pro 8, which represented the most significant revision to the tablet in years, maintained that spot.

Microsoft has introduced the Surface Pro 9, which retains the same basic design while updating the internals. Read on to find out if the newest Surface Pro is worth an upgrade.
Specs

Read more
Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 vs. Surface Laptop 4: Is the upgrade worth it?
Using a Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 sitting on a couch with a dog.

Microsoft's Surface Laptop 5 is here, ready to replace the ultrathin Surface Laptop 4. Announced at the annual fall Surface event, the laptop brings some changes to the lineup, but most of the differences are on the inside.

Seeing as Microsoft decided to drop AMD in the Surface Laptop 5, the battle between the Surface Laptop 5 and the Surface Laptop 4 could be fiercer than one might expect. Intel versus AMD debates are always spicy. Let's see how these two laptops compare.
Specs

Read more
Microsoft says disabling these two Windows 11 features will boost gaming performance
An Alienware + Windows 11 PC gaming setup.

Two settings in Windows 11 may affect gaming performance, says Microsoft. These settings are enabled by default.

Microsoft has made it possible for you to disable these options, but there are also reasons why you might want to keep them on. However, if your computer's performance in games is less than stellar, they might be worth checking out.

Read more