Skip to main content

Intel ‘Bean Canyon’ NUC Review

Intel’s newest NUC calls to your inner do-it-yourself geek

intel nuc bean canyon review 8i7beh feat 2
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Intel ‘Bean Canyon’ NUC
MSRP $484.00
“Intel’s NUC is tiny in size and price, but not in performance.”
Pros
  • Surprisingly easy to upgrade
  • Plenty of connectivity
  • Great performance for its size
  • Iris 655 makes light gaming an option
Cons
  • Requires do-it-yourself approach
  • Design is all function, no form

Most people still think of a tower PC when they buy a desktop. Yet there is another option. Smaller desktops have existed for years now, and Intel’s Next Unit of Computing – commonly abbreviated as NUC – has led the way.

Recommended Videos

Intel uses NUC to prove what its hardware can do in a small footprint, but Intel also sells the NUC to home users. It’s even consistent with updates. The “Bean Canyon” NUCs, as they’re called internally, are the newest mainstream option. The NUC 8i7BEH we received for review retails for $480 and has an Intel Core i7-8559U. That’s a low price for a powerful processor.

There’s reason for that – it’s a kit PC. RAM, a hard drive, and an operating system aren’t included. Is NUC worth going to the trouble of building it out yourself?

It’s a box, but a small one

While the internals of Intel’s NUC have changed drastically over the years, the basic footprint remains the same. Our review unit was a tiny box, about five inches on a side and two inches tall. The entry-level models, with less powerful processors, are about half as thick. It’s clad in dark gray metal not unlike a Mac Mini, but the top is glossy plastic. The design puts function over form. It’s simply a box. It’s good, then, that the NUC is small enough to hide in a drawer or behind a monitor.

You might think the NUC’s size prevents upgrades. Think again. This is a kit PC, so easy access to the guts is essential. That means you can open the NUC by unscrewing the four feet on its bottom. With those removed, you detach two cable-in cables and slide out the bottom. You then have immediate access to two RAM DIMM slots and the M.2 solid state drive slot. Our model also supported a SATA hard drive, located in the top of the NUC, though we did not choose to install one for our tests.

Upgrading a desktop doesn’t get easier than this. The fact you can easily change RAM in a system that’s half the size of a Mac Mini makes the NUC’s easy access even more remarkable.

The i7-8559U is a mobile chip at heart, but it lives its best life in the NUC.

Connectivity is solid, too. You’ll find four USB-A 3.0 ports (two front and two rear), joined by HDMI 2.0, Thunderbolt 3, an Ethernet jack, a microSD card reader, and a front-mounted 3.5mm audio jack. It’s a solid array of options for a small system and offers support for both current and future peripherals.

It’s a mobile processor, but a quick one

The NUC 8i7BEH1 model we reviewed came with a Core i7-8559U processor. That’s a quad-core chip with a maximum Turbo clock speed of 4.5GHz. Since the NUC we received was a kit, it didn’t have a RAM or hard drive. We installed 16GB of Timetec DDR4-2400MHz memory (in 2x8GB configuration) and a Samsung 860 Evo 1TB M.2 solid state drive.

Intel NUC 8i7BEH Bean Canyon review
Dan Baker/Digital Trends

The i7-8559U is a mobile chip at heart, but it lives its best life in the NUC.

These performance results are quite solid. According to Geekbench 4, the NUC’s i7-8559U can keep up with any Core i7 laptop, losing only to those few Core i9 models. It loses against Apple’s Mac Mini with Core i5 processor, but not by much.

[infogram-responsive id="bbe50744-8d08-490b-abb0-caef071cd7f5" title="Intel NUC 8i7BEH1 Processor Performance"]

Handbrake results are equally impressive. The tiny NUC doesn’t set any records, but it does best several similarly priced laptops and comes surprisingly close to full-sized desktops at and above its price range. The more expensive Hades Canyon NUC just barely defeats it.

Remember, this is a kit PC you can purchase for $480. The RAM we bought was $130, the hard drive was $150, and a copy of Windows 10 Home will set you back $100. That’s $860 in total, which is $240 less than the Mac Mini with a Core i5, or $60 more than the Mac Mini with Core i3. The NUC’s processor performance is a good value. You just need to be brave and put it together yourself.

An unusual Intel graphics option offers unusual results

There’s one component in the NUC 8i7BEH1 that we’ve never tested before. The integrated graphics hardware. It’s Intel’s Iris Plus Graphics 655, the most extravagant incarnation of Intel integrated graphics that we’ve tested. Intel boasted of its performance during a visit to the company’s Portland campus earlier this year.

[infogram-responsive id="49753572-4ea5-4faf-bbad-17794f1c6dc6" title="Intel Bean Canyon NUC 8i7BEH1 Gaming Performance"]

Whether it’s worth the boast depends on your perspective. As our tests show, Iris Plus Graphics performs a bit south of Nvidia’s MX150. That means it can handle most modern games at low detail settings, and less demanding games like Rocket League are enjoyable. You can’t, however, expect to load up a game like Deus Ex: Mankind Divided and have a good time. Even Battlefield 1 is a stretch, as it averaged only 20 frames per second at 1080p resolution and Medium detail. You must bump it down to low for a reasonable experience.

Remember, this is a small system, and not a particularly expensive one. Intel’s Hades Canyon NUC is available if you do want to game. Iris Plus Graphics 655 at least makes less intensive games an option, which is more than can be said for most entry-level desktops, or even most laptops. Don’t buy this if you want to game. But do know that you can enjoy a few rounds of Rocket League if you’d like.

Our Take

Intel’s latest NUC, like past models, fits snugly into its niche. Most people don’t want a small yet powerful PC that requires a little do-it-yourself work, but if you do, the NUC is the obvious choice. It’s extremely quick for its size, and not a bad performance value even compared to larger desktops. Geeks looking to simplify their desktop should take notice.

Is there a better alternative?

The NUC has few direct competitors. Kit PCs aren’t the most popular category. Even small desktops are rare.

Apple’s Mac Mini is one possible alternative. You can’t easily customize or upgrade it, and it’s not as small, but it does provide faster processor options and it’s far more intuitive. Intel’s own Hades Canyon NUC is another alternative, since it offers a slightly faster processor and an AMD graphics chip. It’s much more expensive however, with most retailers selling it for at least $750. The faster model, which we reviewed, is often around $1,000.

You might also compare it with mid-size desktops like the Dell Inspiron and HP Pavilion line. These often offer the same performance at a slightly lower price, but the discount isn’t significant. Keep in mind, though, that affordable desktops sometimes offer a graphics card option. That’s important if you have any plans to game.

How long will it last?

The Intel NUC’s RAM and hard drive can be upgraded, so you can tweak it if you need most storage of memory in the future. You can’t change the processor, however. We think it’ll offer at least five years of service but may start to show its age towards the end of that.

A one-year warranty is included with the Intel NUC. That’s standard for the category.

Should you buy it?

Yes, if you’re comfortable with installing your own RAM and hard drive. The NUC does its job well, but it fits a small niche, and its small size does compromise its potential performance. Still, if you want a small and inexpensive PC, it’s hard to go wrong with a NUC.

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
Not this again: Intel Arrow Lake may have instability issues
A render for an Intel Arrow Lake CPU.

Intel's Arrow Lake is just a couple of days from hitting the market, and we've been inundated with various reports and leaked benchmarks. Today's news doesn't sound good, though. YouTuber Moore's Law Is Dead reports that Arrow Lake, also referred to as Core Ultra 200-S, may have some instability issues -- much like what we've seen Intel battle for months on end with Raptor Lake.

Before we dive in, keep in mind that all of this is yet to be confirmed, and we're mere days away from finding out whether it's true or not. However, it could give some buyers a reason to hold off and read the reviews before preordering the CPUs. Moore's Law Is Dead talked about various reviewers and tech YouTubers who had something bad to say about Arrow Lake's stability. The issues are twofold: A wild discrepancy between benchmarks, and running into crashes.

Read more
These are the 5 best budget GPUs you can buy for under $300
Two RTX 4060 graphics cards stacked on top of each other.

Graphics cards are only getting more expensive, but there are still a handful of excellent budget GPUs you can pick up today. As the generation nears its end and we await the arrival of RTX 50-series and RDNA 4 graphics cards, we've seen GPU prices drop on last-gen options like the RTX 4060 and RX 7600, which are some of the best budget graphics cards you can buy.

For the purposes of this guide, we're defining a budget graphics card as anything that costs less than $300. In the context of a full PC build, that should mean the overall price you're spending on a PC is between $600 and $700. If you have a bit more money to spare, make sure to read our full roundup of the best graphics cards, which has a few more expensive options.

Read more
Intel’s next laptop chips may have a secret weapon
Intel Core Ultra Series 2 Lunar Lake chipset.

An upcoming Intel graphics solution, namely the Intel Arc 140T, has recently been spotted on GFXBench. The most interesting bit is that it offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Xe2-based Arc 140V iGPU that recently made its appearance on Intel’s latest Lunar Lake mobile CPUs.

A post by X (formerly Twitter) user Michael (@miktdt) compares GFXbench scores of the Arc 140T with two Arc 140V SKUs—one with 16GB memory and the other with 8GB. The 8GB Arc 140V reached 6,613 frames with an average of 106.7 framers per second (fps), while the 16GB version achieved 6,839 frames at 110.3 fps. However, the Intel Arc 140T, equipped with 16GB of memory, excelled with 11,056 frames at an average of 178.3 fps, surpassing the 16GB Arc 140V by 62%, despite both GPUs sharing eight Xe cores.

Read more