Skip to main content

Intel reports record fourth quarter earnings

The world may still be in the throes of a major economic slowdown…but you wouldn’t know it to talk to chipmaking giant Intel: the company has announced record-setting earnings for the fourth quarter of 2010, including net income of $3.4 billion, operating income of $4.3 billion, and overall revenue of $11.5 billion. The numbers not only beat Wall Street estimates for how well the company would perform, but set records for all three financial metrics.

Intel CEO Paul Otellini was succinct in his summary of the results: “2010 was the best year in Intel’s history. We believe that 2011 will be even better.”

Intel’s net income of $3.4 billion is up 15 percent compared to the third quarter of 2010, and up a whopping 48 percent compared to the same quarter a year ago. Although increases in net revenue are more modest—up three percent compared to the previous quarter and eight percent compared to the previous year—operating income so a jump of almost 74 percent compared to a year ago, although up five percent compared to the previous quarter.

The financial results also serve to highlight the shifting nature of Intel’s business. Results for the company’s PC processor business—responsible for CPUs and chipsets used in traditional PCs and notebooks, along with Intel’s Atom line—were flat for the quarter, where Intel’s data center group saw a 15 percent increase in sales compared to the third quarter. Intel also saw increases in purchases from businesses and enterprise, which helped offset decreased purchases in the consumer segment.

Industry watchers expect Intel to benefit from the looming boon in tablet computing, particularly as tablets are adopted by enterprises and large organizations: not only is Intel positioning itself as a leading processor and component developer for tablet devices, but tablets will need to be supported by server infrastructure—and Intel will be right there with Xeon-powered servers. The company expects revenue for the first quarter of 2011 to reach $11.5 billion (±400 million) with gross margins near 64 percent.

Of course, Intel won’t be alone in the tablet market, and faces stiff competition from the broad ARM chip ecosystem, which currently powers a number of tablet and smartphone devices (including the iPad)—and recently got a nod from Microsoft when it announced it plans to bring Windows 8 to ARM-based devices. Intel doesn’t seem to be worried, however, and believes its Atom line of processors can (and does) compete favorably with ARM and MIPS processors in not only embedded systems, but also consumer electronics, smartphones, and tablets.

Topics
Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Intel chips held back the 15-inch MacBook Air, Apple says
Apple's 15-inch MacBook Air placed on a desk.

Apple’s 15-inch MacBook Air is a surprisingly good laptop, and its positive reception might make you wonder why Apple didn’t launch it sooner. Well, we just got the answer from Apple itself, and it turns out the fault apparently lies with Intel.

That interesting tidbit was revealed by Laura Metz, Director of Product Marketing at Apple, and Thomas Tan from Apple’s enterprise product marketing team. Speaking to Inc, the pair explained that Apple silicon was the driving force in creating the 15-inch MacBook Air.

Read more
Intel just admitted defeat
Intel's new Intel Core Ultra badge.

Intel has just made a pretty significant announcement -- it's rebranding its processors. Starting with Meteor Lake CPUs, Intel's consumer processors will bear a new name: Intel Core and Intel Core Ultra. Even more head-turning, Intel will also drop the iconic "i" in its naming scheme.

The change might seem subtle on the surface, but it says something meaningful about the state of the industry and Intel's role in it. For so many years, Intel's commanding lead in the processor world meant its competitors were the ones mimicking its approach to product names and marketing -- AMD, most obviously.

Read more
Intel’s Arc graphics cards have quietly become excellent
The backs of the Arc A770 and Arc A750 graphics cards.

Intel's Arc A770 and A750 were decent at launch, but over the past few months, they've started to look like some of the best graphics cards you can buy if you're on a budget. Disappointing generational improvements from AMD and Nvidia, combined with high prices, have made it hard to find a decent GPU around $200 to $300 -- and Intel's GPUs have silently filled that gap.

They don't deliver flagship performance, and in some cases, they're just straight-up worse than the competition at the same price. But Intel has clearly been improving the Arc A770 and A750, and although small driver improvements don't always make a splash, they're starting to add up.
Silently improving

Read more