Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Features

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

The most innovative monitors of 2023

By

This year was huge for monitors. In 2023, we saw the first OLED gaming monitors, refresh rates beyond what we could have ever imagined, and unique form factors that enhance productivity and media consumption by a mile.

There’s always the old guard on our list of the best monitors if you want a good, reliable display. But these monitors pushed the envelope this year in a way no other displays did.

Recommended Videos

Want to see the rest? Check out our full list of the most innovative tech products of 2023!

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!
Privacy Policy

Most innovative: Samsung Odyssey OLED G9

The Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 was the most innovative monitor of 2023.
Digital Trends

Just because a monitor is big doesn’t mean its innovative, but the Odyssey OLED G9 is truly innovative. It’s an impressive 32:9 display that measures 49 inches diagonally, which is a form factor Samsung has championed over the past couple of years. This year, though, it’s delivered via a QD-OLED panel, and that makes all the difference.

OLED looks amazing, but it’s the practicality of this tech that stands out on the Odyssey OLED G9. Compared to LCD, where you need to allocate some space in the monitor for a backlight, OLED is very thin. That allowed Samsung to massively cut down on the size of the Odyssey OLED G9, delivering a slim metal frame and more subtle curve compared to the previous version. Both monitors are big, but an aggressive curve and chunky plastic back made the previous Odyssey Neo G9 too impractical for most users to consider.

The panel swap is also a huge boost to image quality. The Odyssey Neo G9 looked great for an LCD monitor, but the perfect black levels of OLED are far more immersive for cinematic games. Combined with the 32:9 aspect ratio, the Odyssey OLED G9 pulls you into the game world, providing the most immersive gaming experience we’ve ever seen.

The Odyssey OLED G9 may not be some new, crazy concept on the level of the Samsung Odyssey Ark, but it takes an already great foundation and improves it through a smart panel swap, and that makes it the most innovative monitor we’ve seen this year.

Runner-up: Alienware 500Hz gaming monitor

Alienware AW2524H on desk.
Alienware

This was the year we saw truly fast gaming monitors. Alienware was the first out of the gate with a 500Hz display, which is a massive leap forward for competitive gamers. Last year, we were looking at 360Hz displays, and this monitor blows past them with ease. It’s too expensive to justify for most casual gamers, but if you’re competitive, there’s nothing better as you can read in our Alienware 500Hz gaming monitor review.

At 500Hz, the screen is refreshed once every 2 milliseconds. There are some games where that can make a big difference, too. If you’re playing titles like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, or Rainbow Six Siege, you can easily cross a frame rate high enough to take advantage of a 500Hz display. In addition, Alienware built an Nvidia Reflex module into the display, allowing you to analyze your latency from the moment you click.

Alienware isn’t alone here, though. Asus also released a 540Hz display this year, and they’re both great options if you’re into competitive gaming. That’s really the best use for these monitors. Although both push the envelope, they’re also both locked at 1080p with middling image quality, so they aren’t the right displays for everyone.

Honorable mention: Asus ROG Swift PG27AQDM

OLED demo on the Asus ROG PG27AQDM.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

The Asus ROG Swift PG27AQDM wasn’t the first 16:9 OLED gaming monitor, but it’s still the best. Since the introduction of OLED gaming monitors, PC gamers have been begging for a traditional 16:9 display in a reasonable size, and that’s exactly what the PG27AQDM delivers. It’s a 27-inch OLED monitor with a 1440p resolution and a blistering 240Hz refresh rate, and those specs hit a surprising sweet spot for high-end PC gaming.

There are a few of these displays making the rounds now, all using the same LG panel. We’re recommending the Asus because it’s by far the brightest we’ve tested. Brightness has always been an issue for OLED, but Asus gets around it with the PG27AQDM. And, of course, you’re still getting the perfect black levels and infinite contrast of OLED.

The largest innovation we saw this year in the world of monitors was OLED, and the Asus ROG Swift PG27AQDM is the perfect representation of that. There are alternatives like LG’s UltraGear OLED 27 that use the same panel, but for our money, Asus has the winner.

Editors’ Recommendations

Topics
Jacob Roach
Jacob Roach
Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
I tried to settle the dumbest debate in PC gaming
settling borderless and fullscreen debate dt respec vs

Borderless or fullscreen? It's a question every PC gamer has run up against, either out of curiosity or from friends trying to get the best settings for their PC games. Following surface-level advice, such as what we lay out in our no-frills guide on borderless versus fullscreen gaming, will set you on the right path. Borderless is more convenient, but it might lead to a performance drop in some games. In theory, that's all you need to know. But the question that's plagued my existence still rings: Why? 

If you dig around online, you'll get wildly different advice about whether borderless or fullscreen is better for your performance. Some say there's no difference. Others claim huge improvements with fullscreen mode in games like PlayerUnkown's Battlegrounds. More still say you'll get better performance with borderless in a game like Fallout 4. You don't need to follow this advice, and you probably shouldn't on a more universal basis, but why are there so many different claims about what should be one of the simplest settings in a graphics menu?

Read more
AMD’s Z2 Extreme chip is coming in early 2025
Ghost of Tsushima running on the Asus ROG Ally X.

AMD is working on the Z2 Extreme, and it's set to show up in early 2025. In a joint Q&A session between AMD and Microsoft attended by Digital Trends, AMD revealed that it's targeting an "early 2025" release for the Z2 Extreme. It's one of the larger announcements to come out of IFA 2024, which has already revealed surprises for handheld gaming PCs like the new Acer Nitro Blaze 7.

Most of the best handheld gaming PCs currently use AMD's Ryzen Z1 Extreme chip. That's true of the Lenovo Legion Go all the way to the recent Asus ROG Ally X. A refresh early next year would likely prompt a wave of new devices that leverage the new chip for higher performance and better battery life.

Read more
Intel just gave up on a plan it laid out years ago
An Intel executive holding a Lunar Lake CPU.

Intel is giving up on its 20A node, or at the very least, it won't show up in any desktop processors. Intel announced that it would shifting resources away from developing 20A toward its smaller 18A node. Intel 20A was the foundation of Intel's upcoming Arrow Lake CPUs. The company says it's now using "external partners" to create Arrow Lake chips, which will likely be chipmaker TSMC.

We first heard about the 20A node in 2021, where the then-new CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out a road map detailing how Intel would move off its storied 14nm node onto smaller manufacturing processes. You could read this shift to 18A as Intel jumping forward to more exciting future technology, but it doesn't bode well given Intel's long-standing road map. The release of 20A was supposed to start the "Angstrom era," as Intel called it, where we would move beyond measuring transistor size in nanometers.

Read more