Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Six-year-old AMD GPU smokes Nvidia’s new GTX 1630 by more than double

Nvidia quietly released the GTX 1630 on Tuesday, following a reported delay at the end of May. The card, which is around $150 and built on the older Turing architecture, won’t be making it into our roundup of the best graphics cards, though. Early reviews show that even the six-year old RX 470 beats the GTX 1630 by as much as 52%.

It’s a dire situation for Nvidia’s new GPU. Guru3D’s review of the Palit GTX 1630 4GB Dual showed that the card sits at the bottom in every benchmark. And that’s not just against the latest graphics cards. In Far Cry 6, for example, the GTX 1630 was beaten by Nvidia’s GTX 1650 Super by a massive 64% at 1080p. AMD’s RX 470, which is twice as old as the GTX 1650 Super, won out by 52%.

MSI's custom GTX 1630 graphics card.
MSI

TechPowerUp reported even worse results, with the GTX 1630 rendering only 14.8 fps in Dying Light 2 at 1080p. For reference, the GTX 1060 that’s six years old and the most popular GPU on Steam, was 110% faster in Dying Light 2 at 1080p based on TechPowerUp’s tests. That’s downright embarrassing.

We knew the GTX 1630 was a bad idea the moment rumors started coming out. It’s built on Nvidia’s last-gen Turing architecture, which didn’t launch in the best state. Nvidia released Super variants less than a year after the initial range launched, and that was three years ago.

The GTX 1630 significantly cuts back the specs, too. Compared to GTX 16-series cards, which Nvidia hasn’t revisited in over two years, the GTX 1630 has 43% fewer cores than the next step up (the GTX 1650). It also has half of the memory bandwidth due to a 64-bit bus, vastly limiting the card’s potential in older systems.

Price is another major problem. Although rumors suggested $150 was the price for models in the U.S., EVGA’s first GTX 1630 is listed for $200. With GPU prices where they are now, you can purchase a brand-new RX 6500 XT for less money. And despite the fact that we called it one of the worst tech products of the year in our RX 6500 XT review, it’s still twice as fast as the GTX 1630.

Given the results we’ve seen so far, there is no reason to buy the GTX 1630. New options are few and far between, but you can pick up the RX 470 for as little as $60 on eBay — a fourth of what some GTX 1630 models are selling for. That won’t lock you out of features, either. Unlike Nvidia’s latest GPUs, the GTX 1630 doesn’t support ray tracing or Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS).

The card could be an option if you’re sitting on a budget GPU from multiple generations back. It’s a step up from the GT 1030, and it’s faster than some GPU deals you’ll find for cards like the GT 710 and Radeon 5450. Still, there are multiple options around the same price as the GTX 1630 that are almost universally twice as fast (or more).

Jacob Roach
Senior Staff Writer, Computing
Jacob Roach is a writer covering computing and gaming at Digital Trends. After realizing Crysis wouldn't run on a laptop, he…
I switched to an AMD GPU for a month — here’s why I don’t miss Nvidia
RX 7900 XTX slotted into a test bench.

AMD's RX 7900 XTX currently tops Digital Trends' list of the best graphics cards. But there's more to a GPU than just performance testing and benchmarks, and some of those things can't be discovered until you live with a piece of tech day in and day out.

So, I figured it was high time to put my proverbial money where my mouth is by using AMD's card every day in my own PC. And a month later, I'm happy to report that aside from some minor hiccups, I don't miss Nvidia as much as I thought I would.
4K flagship performance

Read more
CES 2023: AMD’s next-gen laptop GPU could beat a desktop RTX 3060
AMD's CEO showing off the RX 7600M XT at CES 2023.

In AMD's CES 2023 keynote address, it debuted its next-generation RDNA3 mobile graphics chips, and their performance and efficiency look to be incredibly impressive. We don't have details on the entire range yet, and we want to conduct our own testing to verify performance, but AMD's bold claims leave us rather excited for the year ahead, especially when these chips are launched alongside impressive onboard GPU performance in next-generation AMD laptops.

The AMD RX 7600M XT and non-XT versions will feature up to 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit memory bus, with support for AMD's smart power and tuning technologies, and are built on a 6nm process. AMD makes major claims about the performance of these GPUs, with the XT model reportedly able to deliver greater gaming performance than even an Nvidia desktop-grade RTX 3060 12GB. We'll need to test that ourselves to verify it, but if true, next-generation mobile gaming laptops are going to be incredibly impressive.

Read more
AMD graphics cards have this one unsung advantage over Nvidia
amd gpus have this one unsung advantage over nvidia software main window skewed

AMD graphics cards have gotten a lot of the limelight recently, especially as the new RX 7900 XTX undercuts Nvidia's RTX 4080 in performance. But as AMD has continued to refine its GPU performance, another big area of improvement has been bubbling under the surface -- AMD Software.

It's been AMD Software, Radeon Software, Adrenalin, and various other names in the past, but regardless of the name, AMD has continued to iterate and improve the software experience for its GPUs. And the version we have now is a big reason why AMD can go up against the best graphics cards.
Everything, all in one place

Read more