Skip to main content

Testing shows Nvdia’s GeForce GTX 1060 outperforming AMD’s Radeon RX 480 in VR

Now that Oculus VR and Facebook have reduced the price of the Oculus Rift, customers have a more affordable option of diving into virtual reality. The bundled headset isn’t exactly cheap, but will likely push customers into grabbing a low-cost graphics card if their current hardware isn’t up to speed. Two affordable options include Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1060 with 6GB of on-board memory ($300) and AMD’s Radeon RX 480 card with 8GB of onboard memory ($250). But which is the better buy for VR?

A recent test shows that Nvidia’s card comes out ahead. Testing included the use of the Oculus Rift, the HTC Vive, and four games: Chronos, Dirt Rally, Obduction, and Edge of Nowhere. The GTX 1060 outperformed the RX 480 in the first three games while both cards tied in performance in Edge of Nowhere. The cards’ performance was measured using FCAT VR, a frame capture analysis tool in the same vein as FRAPS, but for VR.

Recommended Videos

That, of course, raises a red flag. The tool is provided by Nvidia, so there is some skepticism given that the testing wasn’t performed with a non-Nvidia/AMD solution. However, the site testing the VR capabilities isn’t necessarily rooting for one specific team over the other, nor is there any indication that Nvidia fine-tuned the tool to provide better numbers for its GeForce cards.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

That said, FCAT VR consists of two components. First, the Capture tool runs on the PC to evaluate its performance and uses data pulled from Oculus Event Tracing, the SteamVR performance API, and Nvidia driver stats. The second component is the Analyzer that grabs data generated by the Capture tool and shows the framerates, the dropped frames, warped frames, synthesized frames, and so on.

Finally, the testbed consisted of an Intel Core i7-5960X Haswell-E processor, an Asus Rampage V-Extreme X99 motherboard, 16GB of Ripjaws DDR4-3,200 from G.Skill, a Corsair AX1500i 1,500-watt power supply, and Windows 10 (64-bit). The operating system resided on a 256GB OCZ Agility 4 SSD and the tested games on a 500GB Adata SP610 SSD.

Using Nvidia driver version 378.78 and AMD driver version 17.2.1, the testing showed AMD’s card creating predicted frames in Chronos and Dirt Rally while Nvidia’s card generated all new frames. Both generated new frames in Edge of Nowhere whereas both cards were caught synthesizing predicted frames in Obduction.

Here are the numbers based on the high preset, which includes an additional test using the Oculus Rift-only Robo Recall game:

GTX 1060 Radeon RX 480
Chronos – Delivered FPS 90.0 76.0
Chronos – Unconstrained FPS 112.5 93.8
 —–
Dirt Rally – Delivered FPS 90.0 47.0
Dirt Rally – Unconstrained FPS 76.3 57.9
 —–
Edge of Nowhere – Delivered FPS 90.0 90.0
Edge of Nowhere – Unconstrained FPS 150.3 143.9
 —–
Obduction – Delivered FPS 63.9 55.3
Obduction – Unconstrained FPS 73.2 61.8
 —–
Robo Recall – Delivered FPS 63.9 55.3
Robo Recall – Unconstrained FPS 73.2 61.8

As the numbers show, the GeForce card may be a better investment for $50 more. But at $250, customers looking to upgrade their desktop to support VR can’t go wrong with AMD’s Radeon RX 480 either. How Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1060 card will measure up to AMD’s upcoming Radeon RX Vega card with the same price tag will be interesting to see.

Kevin Parrish
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kevin started taking PCs apart in the 90s when Quake was on the way and his PC lacked the required components. Since then…
There will be one more year of the iMac Pro being missing in action
Apple iMac Pro News

This week, Apple announced a new M4 iMac. It got some upgrades that help make it more appealing to creatives and pros, such as the more powerful M4 chip, Thunderbolt 4, upgraded camera, and nano-texture display.

But an iMac Pro, this is not.

Read more
The best tablets in 2025: top 8 tablets you can buy now
Disney+ app on the iPad Air 5.

Even the best smartphones still have relatively small screens. After all, they can only get so big before they're no longer practical or pocketable. There are some great folding phones that try to give you the best of both worlds, but these are pricy options and often make compromises you're unwilling to live with. If you're looking for a larger canvas for reading, sketching, gaming, or just about anything else, you're likely much better off going with a tablet. This lets your smartphone keep doing what it does best — being portable, taking great pictures, and offering solid battery life — while giving you an alternative for those times when you need more screen real estate.

However, choosing the right tablet can be tricky. People use tablets in different ways, so there are dozens of options on the market to address these myriad needs. We know how hard it can be to wade through them all and find the one that works best for your use case and budget, so we've done the legwork for you, reviewing dozens of tablets across the entire spectrum to compile a list of the top eight for all walks of life.

Read more
There’s a new challenger to one of our favorite laptops
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Aura Edition front view showing display and keyboard.

When it came out earlier this year, the Surface Laptop 7th Edition was a breath of fresh air. So much so that our computing editor adopted it as his "new daily carry" after reviewing the device.

And while we still highly recommend that laptop, there's a new challenger in town. The Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Aura Edition is one of the rare laptops comes with a 15-inch display that can match the Surface Laptop 7th Edition -- and it also comes with the latest Intel chip. It's the perfect foil to the Surface Laptop 7th Edition, and in some ways, might be an even better option.
Specs and configurations

Read more