Skip to main content

Activision CEO details decision behind rolling with the Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 leak

modern warfare 3If you’ve got any sort of interest in the world of video games, you very likely heard last week about a massive leak of information on Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3. This was before even the game’s publisher, Activision, had officially confirmed its existence. The company responded in a way that no one expected, embracing the setback as an opportunity to get this launch — which was presumably going to happen at E3 next month — started a little early, with official confirmation and four teaser trailers.

It was a canny move on the publisher’s part, stepping into the maelstrom instead of pretending it was never there to begin with. Activision CEO Eric Hirshberg addressed the reasoning behind the decision to move forward with an early official reveal of Modern Warfare 3 in an interview with Joystiq. It’s a refreshingly honest and almost frighteningly rational response to the situation, one which acknowledges both the benefits and costs of our Internet-connected, social media-oriented world and accepts that this unpredictability should be worked with.

“It would be really easy to just obsess over the event, which was the leak, and obsess over how it happened, and that’s only looking backwards,” Hirshberg said. “And in the meantime, your launch just started. And you aren’t always in control of the schedule and the dialogue, and you need to be comfortable of those rapids in this day and age. That’s actually one of the things that separates good marketing from great marketing today.”

This wouldn’t be a story at all if the leak hadn’t happened, and that’s really Hirshberg’s point. You can’t predict when or if these things will happen. The Modern Warfare 3 situation happened in a bigger way than leaks often do, but the current social landscape is what causes everything, large and small, to spread so quickly. Activision’s response might have been atypical for the normally secretive video game industry, but it was very obviously the most rational one.

“We woke up with a marketing crisis and wanted to go to bed with a marketing win,” Hirshberg added. “So what we did was we kind of took that exact conversation we were having in our conference room outside and had it publicly in social media. Through our various channels, through Robert Bowling at [Infinity Ward], through Facebook and through our YouTube channel, we reached out to our fans and we said, ‘Look, we didn’t schedule this. This wasn’t something we had planned. But everyone seems excited, so we’re just going to roll with it. So here they are, a couple of assets that weren’t scheduled to be out for another couple of weeks, we’re going to release ’em to you today.'”

Bravo to Activision for making the smart play, whether or not it was born out of necessity.

Editors' Recommendations

Adam Rosenberg
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Previously, Adam worked in the games press as a freelance writer and critic for a range of outlets, including Digital Trends…
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0’s new update just nerfed the game’s best weapons
Characters on Ashika Island in Warzone 2.0.

Activision has released a new Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 update that nerfs the game's best long-range weapons: the Cronen Squall and the ISO Hemlock. Specifically, the damage across both weapons has been reduced, making them both less effective in all situations.

The news comes from the battle royale game's latest round of patch notes, which outlines the new changes to the weapons. There are some major implications to those changes, though the updates aren't as devastating as they might initially seem. Here's every tweak that was implemented in the new patch.

Read more
6 months after launch, is Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 worth playing?
is warzone 20 worth playing six months after launch 2 0

Six months after its initial release, Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 has evolved tremendously, with many new features added as part of major updates. Despite this, the game still feels slightly unfinished in ways, lacking some of the features that made the original so great. Warzone 2.0 is a complex beast that may steer newcomers away, but if players can learn to master it, the battle royale can be a lot of fun, especially with a team.

But with so much competition in the battle royale space, is Warzone 2.0 worth your time six months later? Here's the current state of the popular shooter after a lot of retooling from Activision.
Slow trickle

Read more
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0’s overpowered new DMZ bundle ignites pay-to-win fears
Character calling in killstreak in Warzone 2.0.

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 has struggled to retain players due to odd gameplay decisions and controversial mechanics that have divided the community. A new feature, though, has players especially up in arms.

Recently, publisher Activision released an in-game store bundle that some players consider a "pay-to-win" option, stirring up criticism once again. The paid bundle, "Roze and Thorn," gives DMZ players a free unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) that temporarily reveals the locations of enemy players at the start of a match, immediately offering an advantage.

Read more