Skip to main content

A unified Call of Duty engine is exactly what the series needs

If you’ve been playing Call of Duty games all your life, you’ve pretty much been playing the same game over and over again. You’re an army guy (which army? Doesn’t matter) and you point your gun, shoot the bad guy, blow up a building, maybe commit a few war crimes, and the day is saved. This is the boiled-down plot of just about every entry in the franchise.

But in another more granular way, you’ve been playing radically different games. While the basic premise of every Call of Duty game is pretty much the same, they don’t all feel like each other. Their guns, movement, and visual styles vary from entry to entry, and for someone who likes one developer’s style but isn’t a fan of another’s, the changes can be jarring. Ask anyone who played 2019’s Modern Warfare and then tried out Black Ops Cold War and they’ll tell you just as much.

It doesn’t seem like that’s going to be a problem anymore though. An important, although minute, detail revealed in today’s Modern Warfare 2 and Warzone 2 news blast is that Activision has opted to ditch that way of doing things. Instead, every Call of Duty game going forward is going to look and feel similar, like siblings instead of cousins. For the franchise, which has stagnated with its past two releases, it’s a decision that will only help players going forward.

Something new every year

With yearly releases, anyone can point to two entries in the Call of Duty franchise and say they’re the same thing. For the most part, they’d be right. Both structurally and thematically, this isn’t a very diverse franchise. It has, and always will be, a set-piece-oriented shooter, where explosions are meant to be livelier than the people causing them. But no two Call of Duty games feel the same.

Different weapons, perks, and maps all lend to the feeling of something new, but what really makes that difference is foundational. Call of Duty games, year by year, hardly ever use the same exact engine. Call of Duty: Black Ops 4, for instance, uses a heavily modified version of the Black Ops 3 engine, which itself is a similarly modified version of the Black Ops 2 engine. 2019’s Modern Warfare uses a revamped version of the Infinity Ward, or IW, engine. The same has been employed in Warzone and VanguardCall of Duty: Black Ops Cold War, which was released between Modern Warfare and Vanguard, went back to using a modified version of the Black Ops 3 engine.

Soldiers infiltrating building in Modern Warfare.

Every year, players would get a game with a different engine than last year’s game. It meant that everything felt just a bit different. Running was faster or slower, players could jump higher, guns felt heavier or lighter. In some cases, entire features would be removed as well. Black Ops Cold War didn’t have Modern Warfare‘s tactical sprint or mantling, two features that had become fan favorites and were present in Warzone.

Call of Duty’s yearly changes made for an inconsistent experience. It’s a franchise where, regardless of how long it’s been since you played one of the games, you know what you’re getting. But that familiarity needs to be more than skin deep. Past being a surface-level first-person shooter, Call of Duty games need to feel the same.

High hopes

With picking a single engine to run Call of Duty games going forward though, Activision is taking a bit of a risk. That engine needs to be solid, not something that splits the fanbase. If half of Call of Duty’s players don’t like the engine that’s going to power the franchise’s next two games, how likely are they to actually pick it up?

Players gathered around frozen lake in Call of Duty: Warzone.

I have a feeling that the company won’t have to worry about that though, having chosen the right studio to put together that engine: Infinity Ward. The developer has been behind most of the iconic entries in the franchise, including Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. Likewise, it’s the one responsible for the IW 8.0 engine, which is used in 2019’s Modern Warfare and Call of Duty: Warzone.

For the upcoming Modern Warfare sequel, which I’ve taken to calling Modern Warfare 2-2, Infinity Ward is developing yet another engine, one that Activision claims the studio has been “working on for years.”

Considering Infinity Ward’s track record, it’s safe to hope that players will find that the next Call of Duty game feels good to play. For Activision’s sake, it really has to. Otherwise, the company will be stuck with an engine players hate in one of its most popular franchises for years to come.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Otto Kratky
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Otto Kratky is a freelance writer with many homes. You can find his work at Digital Trends, GameSpot, and Gamepur. If he's…
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0’s new update just nerfed the game’s best weapons
Characters on Ashika Island in Warzone 2.0.

Activision has released a new Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 update that nerfs the game's best long-range weapons: the Cronen Squall and the ISO Hemlock. Specifically, the damage across both weapons has been reduced, making them both less effective in all situations.

The news comes from the battle royale game's latest round of patch notes, which outlines the new changes to the weapons. There are some major implications to those changes, though the updates aren't as devastating as they might initially seem. Here's every tweak that was implemented in the new patch.

Read more
6 months after launch, is Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 worth playing?
is warzone 20 worth playing six months after launch 2 0

Six months after its initial release, Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 has evolved tremendously, with many new features added as part of major updates. Despite this, the game still feels slightly unfinished in ways, lacking some of the features that made the original so great. Warzone 2.0 is a complex beast that may steer newcomers away, but if players can learn to master it, the battle royale can be a lot of fun, especially with a team.

But with so much competition in the battle royale space, is Warzone 2.0 worth your time six months later? Here's the current state of the popular shooter after a lot of retooling from Activision.
Slow trickle

Read more
Turn this Warzone 2.0 rifle into a powerhouse with one easy trick
Character holding Cronen Squall battle rifle in Warzone 2.0.

There are a handful of midrange to long-range meta weapons in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, with nearly all of them performing in a balanced way. Some, like the Kastov 762, hit like a truck, but are hard to control, while the ISO Hemlock deals less damage, but has virtually no recoil.

But the Cronen Squall, a battle rifle that launched during Season 3, is immensely overpowered, and has almost zero recoil. It has the ability to take down an opponent in three to six shots, making it grossly unbalanced, but the weapon does not perform this well by default.
Overpowered Cronen Squall build

Read more