Skip to main content

Will Activision Blizzard games be Xbox exclusive? Look at history

Microsoft is acquiring Activision Blizzard, and that’s a massive deal. That’s not hyperbole — it is literally the biggest acquisition in gaming history, totaling $68.7 billion.

But it’s also a massive deal for players, and not just on Xbox or PC, but also on PlayStation. Because once this acquisition closes in 2023 and Microsoft has the reins of Activision Blizzard, you can expect a solid number of the publisher’s IPs to become console exclusive.

And yes, I do mean Call of Duty too.

Recommended Videos

It’s happened before

If you’re reading this in horror, mouth agape, thinking to yourself “no, Microsoft can’t do this” well, do I have some bad news for you: It can, and it has done this exact same thing before. Recall Microsoft’s acquisition of ZeniMax Media back in 2020. It was a simpler time, when we thought a $7.5 billion acquisition was massive. But immediately following it, players had the same concerns. Could Microsoft take Bethesda’s games and make them exclusive to Xbox consoles?

For a while, Phil Spencer left that question up in the air. In a blog post, he wrote that “some new titles in the future” will be exclusive to Xbox and PC players. Of course, “some” is the keyword there, and it left room for PlayStation players to hope. It meant that maybe, just maybe, the next Elder Scrolls or Fallout game would head to every platform, just like they had when Bethesda wasn’t a first-party studio.

A character in Starfield.

That was then shot down when Spencer did an interview with GQ, in which he said that both Starfield and The Elder Scrolls VI would be exclusive to Xbox and PC. Bethesda’s senior vice president of global communications, Pete Hines, could do nothing but apologize if fans were “unhappy or pissed or whatever,” in an interview with GameSpot. He immediately followed that with “Sorry. All I can really say is I apologize, because I’m certain that that’s frustrating to folks, but there’s not a whole lot I can do about it.”

Simply put, in 2021 it didn’t make sense for Microsoft to let players on PlayStation consoles get Bethesda’s games. While the company may say that it wants everyone to be able to play games easily, there’s a caveat in there that those games have to be played on Microsoft’s platforms. That means if you’re not on Xbox or if you don’t have a game pass subscription, you’re out of luck. And that’s not changing any time soon.

Same as it ever was

With Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard, the question of whether or not Call of Duty — along with so many of Activision Blizzard’s other major franchises — will be exclusive to Xbox and PC answers itself. Just like with its acquisition of ZeniMax Media, Microsoft isn’t going to spend inordinate amounts of money to put games on platforms it doesn’t own. It would rather bring players into its own ecosystem, have them buy a Game Pass subscription or an Xbox console.

There is no incentive for Microsoft to give PlayStation players games, and the tech giant certainly isn’t going to do it out of goodwill.

Starting in 2023, when Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard is set to close, you can bet that Call of Duty, along with multiple other franchises, will make the move over to Xbox’s platforms. If we’re being honest, the only way PlayStation users will be able to play a Call of Duty game after next year will be through Call of Duty: Warzone. If you’re a PlayStation owner who’s looking for the annual Call of Duty experience, open your wallet and get ready to pay Microsoft.

Otto Kratky
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Otto Kratky is a freelance writer with many homes. You can find his work at Digital Trends, GameSpot, and Gamepur. If he's…
Microsoft wins FTC case, removing Xbox’s biggest Activision Blizzard acquisition hurdle
Characters shooting in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2.

Following a multi-week court case, Microsoft has won its battle with the Federal Trade Commission regarding its proposed Activision Blizzard acquisition. The ruling is a major win for Microsoft's troubled deal, clearing the biggest hurdle it faced.

Last January, Microsoft announced its intention to acquire Activision Blizzard for $69 billion. The blockbuster announcement immediately raised antitrust concerns, which resulted in the FTC filing a legal challenge in December 2022. Microsoft has not been able to proceed with the acquisition since then, as its faced similar scrutiny in the U.K.

Read more
Vondel is the best Call of Duty: Warzone map ever and it’s not even close
Characters on the Vondel map in Warzone.

Since Call of Duty: Warzone's release in 2020, Activision has released a number of battle royale maps -- some of which have captivated a large audience. Think Verdansk, Rebirth Island, and Fortune's Keep. Though, with the new version of Warzone (formerly referred to as Warzone 2.0), the maps haven't garnered the same positive buzz ... until now.

Alongside the release of Season 4, Activision released the new Vondel map, which takes place in an urban Netherlands city, full of various buildings, a canal, and even a public transit system (via ground or water). Vondel isn't just great, it's the best Warzone map ever made.
What is Vondel?

Read more
FTC v. Microsoft: 5 surprising revelations from the court hearing that you need to know
Call of Duty Warzone screenshot of 3 characters walking towards the camera.

We have reached an inflection point in Microsoft’s efforts to acquire Call of Duty and World of Warcraft publisher Activision Blizzard as the FTC’s lawsuit to stop it went before a judge. Representatives from Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo, Google, and Nvidia chimed in during the hearing, as did a variety of analysts presenting data to help determine whether or not this acquisition will hurt competition in the console and cloud gaming markets.
As the video game industry is quite buttoned-up and secretive, this trial has given us an unprecedented look behind the curtain at Xbox, PlayStation, and Activision’s motivations, past claims and mistakes they made, and more. In a case filled with revelations, these five details were a particularly illuminating look into the video game industry's inner workings.
Microsoft revealed its real cloud gaming motivation

Since 2019, Microsoft has been one of the video game industry’s biggest purveyors of cloud gaming alongside the likes of Nvidia, Amazon, and Google. It previously claimed that its primary goal with this was to get its hardcore games like Halo in front of as many people as possible, but this trial has revealed a secondary motivation. Microsoft hoped cloud gaming would give them an edge in the mobile gaming market, where Xbox has struggled to establish itself.
“We built xCloud knowing that on Xbox we have many games that run on our console,” Head of Xbox Phil Spencer explained. “There are many users around the world that have phones that aren’t able to play those games, nor will they be. Our strategy was to put consoles in our data centers to stream those consoles to a mobile phone, so if someone wanted to play Halo on a mobile phone, they would have access to those games through streaming.
It didn’t work out that way, though. Xbox’s VP of Game Creator Experience, Sarah Bond, testified that the most common use for cloud gaming is not mobile play but console players trying out a game before or during a download. Because cloud gaming is a sticking point for the CMA, Microsoft wants to downplay its relevancy to Xbox’s business, but, as I wrote in April, it might be too late for them to do that. Even if cloud gaming’s future is as a supplementary service on consoles, it’s sticking around as one of the central aspects of dissent against the acquisition. The future of cloud gaming is just playing out in a way no one predicted when it re-rose to prominence four years ago.
Activision regrets not putting Call of Duty on Nintendo Switch

Read more