Activision will never charge for Call of Duty, says CEO

By Molly McHugh November 24, 2010

Earlier this year, analysts suggested that declining video game sales could be boosted by charging for online gaming. Since then, Call of Duty fans have been anxious to hear whether or not Activision would indeed charge them for multiplayer use online. Executive Bobby Kotick even said in July that if he could change his company in any way, it would be to turn Call of Duty into “an online subscription service tomorrow.”

But rest assured, Kotick won’t be getting his way. Today, Activision Publishing CEO Eric Hirshberg claimed its users would not be hit with a new bill. Hirshberg told Industry Gamers “The answer is no” when it comes to charging for online multiplayer. Saying the community aspect Call of Duty online brings to its users is “integral,” Hirshberg went so far as to state that there would never be a fee on the service.

The record-breaking success of Call of Duty: Black Ops has clearly been good for Activision’s business, and maintaining friendly relations with its consumers is a smart move for future Call of Duty releases. Announcing that the game’s online multiplayer function remains free of charge mere days before Black Friday also serves as a subtle reminder: the bestselling game is on shelves this holiday season, subscription fee-free.

Editors' Recommendations

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…

Gaming

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0’s new update just nerfed the game’s best weapons

Characters on Ashika Island in Warzone 2.0.

Activision has released a new Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 update that nerfs the game's best long-range weapons: the Cronen Squall and the ISO Hemlock. Specifically, the damage across both weapons has been reduced, making them both less effective in all situations.

The news comes from the battle royale game's latest round of patch notes, which outlines the new changes to the weapons. There are some major implications to those changes, though the updates aren't as devastating as they might initially seem. Here's every tweak that was implemented in the new patch.

Gaming

6 months after launch, is Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 worth playing?

is warzone 20 worth playing six months after launch 2 0

Six months after its initial release, Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 has evolved tremendously, with many new features added as part of major updates. Despite this, the game still feels slightly unfinished in ways, lacking some of the features that made the original so great. Warzone 2.0 is a complex beast that may steer newcomers away, but if players can learn to master it, the battle royale can be a lot of fun, especially with a team.

But with so much competition in the battle royale space, is Warzone 2.0 worth your time six months later? Here's the current state of the popular shooter after a lot of retooling from Activision.
Slow trickle

Gaming

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0’s overpowered new DMZ bundle ignites pay-to-win fears

Character calling in killstreak in Warzone 2.0.

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 has struggled to retain players due to odd gameplay decisions and controversial mechanics that have divided the community. A new feature, though, has players especially up in arms.

Recently, publisher Activision released an in-game store bundle that some players consider a "pay-to-win" option, stirring up criticism once again. The paid bundle, "Roze and Thorn," gives DMZ players a free unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) that temporarily reveals the locations of enemy players at the start of a match, immediately offering an advantage.