Skip to main content

The Last of Us Part II death threats are a selfish, destructive response to art

Note: This article contains spoilers for The Last of Us Part II.

The conversation and culture surrounding The Last of Us Part II have become increasingly toxic and vile as a rush of displeased fans turn dissatisfaction into hate. It’s not a new behavior, but it is one that needs to end.

It all began in April 2020, when a series The Last of Us Part II leaks went online. The leaks were broad, showing full cutscenes and twists, though they (or the inferences people made) weren’t entirely accurate. Still, fans were mad, and some threatened to boycott the game entirely.

When the game’s review embargo lifted just before its release, many outlets, including Digital Trends, offered glowing remarks and scores. Due to embargo restrictions on what reviewers could say, even the most critical reviews didn’t include complaints that flowed from the leaks. This led to unfounded conspiracies that reviewers were paid off because they didn’t mention criticisms regarding the shift in perspective to initial antagonist Abby.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Now, the game is out, and people can play it for themselves. Fans are still mad. Players have review-bombed Part II on Metacritic. Many of these reviews veer away from criticism of the game and into hateful comments laden with slurs.

Weeks have passed since the game’s release. You’d think the fervor would die down. Instead, the situation is growing worse. Creative director and lead co-writer Neil Druckmann, along with Laura Bailey (who voiced the much-hated character Abby), spoke out against the racist, anti-Semitic, homophobic, transphobic, and misogynistic messages and death threats flooding their inboxes. 

Yes. Death threats were sent. Because people were mad about a game. Again.

The ‘customer is always right’ doesn’t apply to art

I’ve witnessed beautiful, supportive moments between gamers and fans across genres. Plenty of Part II players love the game or, if they don’t, are able to restrain themselves from sending hateful comments.

Art, be it visual, cinematic, or games, is subjective. We buy the ability to experience it, not necessarily to like it. The more art challenges us, the better we are for it. It allows the medium to thrive, asks important questions, and forces us to rethink our beliefs. Gamers resorting to harassment and death threats in an attempt to force creators to make content they like are stifling the industry.

Screenshot from The Last of Us Part II
Naughty Dog

It’s not a personal attack when a game breaks from expectations or brings harm to characters we’ve grown attached to. It’s a part of storytelling. Compelling stories are often those that surprise us, that make us have feelings we weren’t expecting, like empathy for a character we thought was the enemy. Countless books, movies, and shows have left me temporarily devastated at the loss of a favorite character.

Yes, if I love a character, I want them to be happy and successful. These characters also need room to grow, however, and that often means overcoming problems. Becoming invested in people and plots, only to be devastated when things go awry, is part of the beauty of fandom. Video games are a much newer medium than books or film, and it’s a relatively recent concept that games could produce the same feelings as those arts. Yet some seemingly want the industry to move backwards.

It’s not a personal attack when a game breaks from expectations or brings harm to characters we’ve grown attached to.

When we break from a “the customer is always right” mentality, we break from a self-centered mindset. That gives the creators who built the stories, characters, and games we love room to push their creative boundaries.

No game is meant for us as individuals. Even my favorite games were not made with me, Lisa Marie, in mind. Even appealing to a small group means a game can’t cater to one individual in that cluster.

Still, some people have taken their identity as fans to mean a game must adhere to their desires. When Pokémon: Let’s Go! Eevee and Pikachu came out, some who played the original Pokémon Yellow took issue with the fact that this release was made with children in mind. Oddly enough, many of those same fans were children themselves when Yellow came out.

The death threats need to stop. It’s not an appropriate response to disliking a game and, if such threats were successful, they would lead only to stagnation.

Lisa Marie Segarra
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Lisa Marie Segarra is the Gaming Section at Digital Trends. She's previously covered tech and gaming at Fortune Magazine and…
Turn on these 6 accessibility settings in The Last of Us Part I before you start
A white arrow shows Joel where to go in The Last of Us Part I.

The Last of Us Part I is out now on PlayStation 5 and it’s a bit of a strange release. In our review, we noted that it’s an excellent game, but not exactly an excellent remake. It's full of impressive, but superfluous tech improvements that don’t meaningfully change the 2013 classic. For players who have experienced it before, $70 is a high price to pay for a game that seemingly brings nothing new to the table.

The Last of Us Part I - Accessibility Trailer | PS5 Games

Read more
The Last Of Us Part I haptic dialogue feedback enhances accessibility
Ellie looking concerned.

The gaming industry continues to do right by gamers with disabilities by putting accessibility features in upcoming games, including The Last Of Us Part I. Naughty Dog has given us an overview of the accessibility features that will be included in the remake of the 2013 classic PlayStation 3 title.

As Sony wrote in the PlayStation Blog, the studio took most of the features that were available in The Last Of Us Part II and expanded upon them. The two features that stand out the most are audio descriptions for cinematic cutscenes and haptic feedback for dialogue. Game director Mattew Gallant said the studio expanded upon those features to make the game even more accessible to blind and deaf players than in the original game.

Read more
The Last of Us Part I should launch on PlayStation Plus Premium
Ellie looking concerned.

The Last of Us Part I is one of the most notable PlayStation 5 games to launch this fall. It’s also one of the year’s most controversial titles.
Despite the acclaim associated with The Last of Us series, there is heated debate surrounding the remake’s $70 price tag, which is more than the original release and The Last of Us Remastered cost at release -- even though it's lacking the multiplayer mode that came with both. This situation turned what should be a certified slam dunk for Sony into a divisive release, and Sony could fix it with one key change: making The Last of Us Part I a day-one title on PlayStation Plus Extra or Premium.
This isn’t because The Last of Us Part I isn’t worth $70. In fact, its improved visuals and the vast amount of new accessibility features clearly warrant the price tag in the eyes of some. That said, even defenders of the heightened price can recognize the controversy arising from charging more than ever for a remake of a twice-released game. The Last of Us Part I is in a rough situation, and being a PS Plus game would ease some of those concerns.
Why being on PS Plus would work
As The Last of Us is one of Sony's most popular modern franchises and has a TV show on the way, it's understandable why Sony and developer Naughty Dog eagerly want a modernized version of The Last of Us Part I on store shelves at full price. Still, those who've already bought the game twice and aren't impressed by the visual and accessibility overhaul don't seem as compelled to pick up the game for the third time. Sony would remove this significant roadblock plaguing The Last of Us Part I by putting the game on a subscription service.
The Last of Us Part I Rebuilt for PS5 - Features and Gameplay Trailer | PS5 Games
There are plenty of examples showing why this would be a wise idea. The Age of Empire series' Definitive Edition games showed how well remakes work on subscription services. Several years after their original release, many players are still actively engaged with the first three Age of Empire games. While interested players can still purchase the remakes individually, putting those games on Game Pass for PC on day one ensured that the community didn't have to pay full price for a game they were already playing daily. Instead, they could just get the remake through their subscription and continue.
The Last of Us Part I is in a similar situation, even with the multiplayer content removed. This demonstrates why a subscription service release could lessen some of the negative stigmas around the game. The successful Stray, which was included in PS Plus at launch, shows that day one PlayStation Plus games can still generate plenty of positive buzz. The game's subscription service availability ensured that the conversation stayed on the game's cute cats, not the fact that it was a $30 game that only lasted about five hours.
Sony has recognized the power PS Plus can have on embattled games before. Destruction All-Stars was originally a $70 PS5 launch title, but ultimately launched as a PlayStation Plus game that was free to subscribers. Although The Last of Us Part I seems like it’ll be a better game than Destruction All-Stars, a day one game makes even more sense on PlayStation Plus Premium and Extra now than it did on PS Plus in February 2021.

Despite all of those factors, Jim Ryan made it clear that he does not want AAA PlayStation Studios games on PlayStation Plus Premium or Extra on day one during an interview with Games Industry.
“We feel like we are in a good virtuous cycle with the studios where the investment delivers success, which enables yet more investment, which delivers yet more success,” Ryan said. “We like that cycle and we think our gamers like that cycle … We feel if we were to do that with the games that we make at PlayStation Studios, that virtuous cycle will be broken. The level of investment that we need to make in our studios would not be possible, and we think the knock-on effect on the quality of the games that we make would not be something that gamers want."
His argument makes sense from a business standpoint, but data from Microsoft shows that people play more games (and games they might not have played initially) when they are available on a subscription service. Even if it seems unfair to judge, many people weigh the amount of new, entertaining content a game offers to its price tag. Sony's can't truly say whether The Last of Us Part I is worth $70, but it can shift the discussion in its favor with an act of goodwill.
The Last of Us Part I will be released for PS5 on September 2, 2022.

Read more