Skip to main content

The Last of Us Part II death threats are a selfish, destructive response to art

Note: This article contains spoilers for The Last of Us Part II.

The conversation and culture surrounding The Last of Us Part II have become increasingly toxic and vile as a rush of displeased fans turn dissatisfaction into hate. It’s not a new behavior, but it is one that needs to end.

It all began in April 2020, when a series The Last of Us Part II leaks went online. The leaks were broad, showing full cutscenes and twists, though they (or the inferences people made) weren’t entirely accurate. Still, fans were mad, and some threatened to boycott the game entirely.

When the game’s review embargo lifted just before its release, many outlets, including Digital Trends, offered glowing remarks and scores. Due to embargo restrictions on what reviewers could say, even the most critical reviews didn’t include complaints that flowed from the leaks. This led to unfounded conspiracies that reviewers were paid off because they didn’t mention criticisms regarding the shift in perspective to initial antagonist Abby.

Now, the game is out, and people can play it for themselves. Fans are still mad. Players have review-bombed Part II on Metacritic. Many of these reviews veer away from criticism of the game and into hateful comments laden with slurs.

Weeks have passed since the game’s release. You’d think the fervor would die down. Instead, the situation is growing worse. Creative director and lead co-writer Neil Druckmann, along with Laura Bailey (who voiced the much-hated character Abby), spoke out against the racist, anti-Semitic, homophobic, transphobic, and misogynistic messages and death threats flooding their inboxes. 

Yes. Death threats were sent. Because people were mad about a game. Again.

The ‘customer is always right’ doesn’t apply to art

I’ve witnessed beautiful, supportive moments between gamers and fans across genres. Plenty of Part II players love the game or, if they don’t, are able to restrain themselves from sending hateful comments.

Art, be it visual, cinematic, or games, is subjective. We buy the ability to experience it, not necessarily to like it. The more art challenges us, the better we are for it. It allows the medium to thrive, asks important questions, and forces us to rethink our beliefs. Gamers resorting to harassment and death threats in an attempt to force creators to make content they like are stifling the industry.

Screenshot from The Last of Us Part II
Naughty Dog

It’s not a personal attack when a game breaks from expectations or brings harm to characters we’ve grown attached to. It’s a part of storytelling. Compelling stories are often those that surprise us, that make us have feelings we weren’t expecting, like empathy for a character we thought was the enemy. Countless books, movies, and shows have left me temporarily devastated at the loss of a favorite character.

Yes, if I love a character, I want them to be happy and successful. These characters also need room to grow, however, and that often means overcoming problems. Becoming invested in people and plots, only to be devastated when things go awry, is part of the beauty of fandom. Video games are a much newer medium than books or film, and it’s a relatively recent concept that games could produce the same feelings as those arts. Yet some seemingly want the industry to move backwards.

It’s not a personal attack when a game breaks from expectations or brings harm to characters we’ve grown attached to.

When we break from a “the customer is always right” mentality, we break from a self-centered mindset. That gives the creators who built the stories, characters, and games we love room to push their creative boundaries.

No game is meant for us as individuals. Even my favorite games were not made with me, Lisa Marie, in mind. Even appealing to a small group means a game can’t cater to one individual in that cluster.

Still, some people have taken their identity as fans to mean a game must adhere to their desires. When Pokémon: Let’s Go! Eevee and Pikachu came out, some who played the original Pokémon Yellow took issue with the fact that this release was made with children in mind. Oddly enough, many of those same fans were children themselves when Yellow came out.

The death threats need to stop. It’s not an appropriate response to disliking a game and, if such threats were successful, they would lead only to stagnation.

Lisa Marie Segarra
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Lisa Marie Segarra is the Gaming Section at Digital Trends. She's previously covered tech and gaming at Fortune Magazine and…
The Last of Us Part 1 boasts a groundbreaking accessibility feature
Ellie pets a giraffe in The Last of Us Part I.

Naughty Dog and Sony have released a new 10-minute video featuring gameplay footage of The Last of Us Part 1. The video includes interviews with some of the game's developers, shedding light on many of the remake's improvements, including a range of accessibility features. Most notable is a detailed audio description feature built into the game, which narrates cutscenes, allowing more players to enjoy the experience.

The Last of Us Part I Rebuilt for PS5 - Features and Gameplay Trailer | PS5 Games

Read more
The Last of Us Part I is exciting, but not for the reason you think
Ellie and Riley look at each other in The Last of Us Part 1's version of Left Behind.

The Last of Us Part I, Naughty Dog's from-the-ground-up rebuild of the PS3 classic, might initially sound like one of the most unnecessary remakes ever because a fairly modern remaster of the game is available for PS4 and backward compatible with the PS5. But this remake does have some important merits that go far beyond its noticeable, but not overwhelmingly impressive visual upgrade. Namely, The Last of Us Part 1 is shaping up to be more approachable and accessible to all types of players. 
A PlayStation Blog post that followed the game's Summer Game Fest debut proclaimed that Naughty Dog "modernized gameplay, improved controls, and expanded accessibility options." Although the remake might seem unnecessary for a lot of players, those improvements will help ensure that more people than ever can experience an all-time classic for the first time. 
Approachable and accessible 
As the accessibility focused website Can I Play That? pointed out in an editorial when the remake's existence first leaked, one of the best potential aspects of a The Last of Us remake is that it would make the classic accessible to more people than ever before. 
"But I’m thinking that this could be an incredible opportunity for Naughty Dog to remake the original game while carrying the accessibility features in The Last of Us Part 2 over," Ben Bayliss wrote. "That way, disabled players who were excluded from enjoying the original game, due to it being inaccessible, will be able to experience it without those concerns of it being unplayable."
https://twitter.com/CanIPlayThat/status/1534935546341883904
The Last of Us is a truly fantastic experience, and we agree that it's only a good thing if more people than ever can play and connect with one of the best games of the last decade. The Last of Us Part I can expand upon the great visual, auditory, and gameplay-focused accessibility options from The Last of Us Part II, enabling disabled people to enjoy its predecessor in a way that was simply impossible with the 2013 original. 
For example, a high-contrast display mode renders the game in a way that makes it easier for people with visual impairments to make out what objects are. Traversal and combat audio cues and highly customizable subtitles ensure that Deaf people can still have a clear idea of everything that's happening in the game. Players could even customize how much damage they take, how aware enemies are during stealth, how scarce or common resources are, and more to make the game as easy or as tough as they needed it to be. 
Giving players the tools to make these tweaks means the whole experience will be easier to digest for players of all skill levels. These changes will redefine The Last of Us' experience more than any story and narrative changes will. If The Last Us Part I follows through with these changes, then it can show developers that accessibility options are just as, if not even more, important than vast visual changes in remakes of more modern games.
The most important changes
The Last of Us' story is so well done that the remake doesn't really need to change or expand upon it much to still be amazing. The visuals were also already great on PS3 and PS4, so the remake's glow-up isn't as impressive as something like Final Fantasy VII Remake. Because of that, The Last of Us is an odd game to remake, but will also make it a great case study that shows how adding accessibility options benefits remakes. 
Normally, remasters and remakes are judged on how significant the visual improvements are. But we're now at the point that PS3 and PS4 games that already looked great are being remade, and visual changes aren't as awe-inspiring as they once were when leaps in power between console generations were more significant. As such, more focus will be put on their gameplay tweaks.

This isn't a completely foreign concept for video game remasters and remakes. Many difficult retro games get rewind or save state features when rereleased on modern systems. These are accessibility options that ensure more people can experience the classics. The more in-depth visual, auditory, and difficulty-focused The Last of Us Part II accessibility options that we want to see in The Last of Us Part I are simply a more thorough version of this. 
Many games from the PS3 and PS4 generations lack helpful accessibility options. It's an extremely beneficial area to improve in, so it's something developers should be paying attention to as they remake games from those generations.  Accessibility options will always be something that expand the reach of a video game's audience and enable more people to enjoy fantastic games. As such, The Last of Us Part I provides the game industry with a moment to rethink what remaking games really means.
The Last of Us Part I will be released for PS5 on September 2.

Read more
Last of Us Part I coming in September, multiplayer spinoff in development
the last of us part 1 tlou1

Sony has officially announced The Last of Us Part I, a remake of 2013's The Last of Us for PS3. The game launches on September 2 for PlayStation 5 and it is in development for PC. The game's existence was leaked via the PlayStation Direct store earlier today, though the listing didn't spoil that a new standalone Last of Us multiplayer game is in the works.

According to the Naughty Dog's blog post, The Last of Us Part I is a complete overhaul of the original game that has modernized gameplay mechanics, including controls and combat as well as accessibility options. The remake uses the PS3's original performances but with improved graphical details and effects.

Read more