Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Warzone 2.0 Plunder mode alleviates the stress of battle royale

Call of Duty has been in a rough spot lately, with declining player counts and frustration from the community. But Activision has offset some of the negativity, at least slightly, with the release of the Plunder mode in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0. This fan-favorite mode was introduced in the original Warzone, but was absent from the sequel until now. In Plunder, the focus isn’t necessarily on surviving, but rather on collecting as much cash as possible. Respawns are enabled and loadouts are available by default, and the overall pacing is faster, so Plunder plays differently from Battle Royale.

It’s a refreshing break from the stress of attempting to be the last squad standing in Battle Royale, making Plunder great for players looking to chill. Since its release, I’ve had such a blast with Plunder that I almost forgot about all the massive problems plaguing Warzone 2.0 at large.

Learning the ropes

Characters parachuting in Warzone 2.0 Season 3.

During Warzone 2.0’s Battle Royale, a lot of the experience comes down to dumb luck. Sure, skill plays a major role, but even an expert player can meet an untimely demise due to something outside of their control. Imagine entering a building, expecting to find armor plates, only to get subsequently outgunned by someone with a sliver of health left. That’s one reason Battle Royale can be off-putting, even to the most hardcore of Call of Duty fans. In Plunder, luck still plays a role as players race to collect the most cash, but you aren’t penalized as hard when things go south. This is thanks to the respawn mechanic, which allows players who are killed to quickly get back into the action.

While this might not seem like a big deal, it truly did impact the way I played. Knowing I could respawn in a matter of seconds pushed me to play more aggressively. The rewards outweigh the risks, as taking an aggressive stance might lead to a satisfying team wipe, while losing the engagement simply cost me the time it took to respawn. Playing more aggressively also only made me better at winning gunfights, so I’d recommend Plunder to anyone looking to refine their Call of Duty playing skills. Everyone else is playing more aggressively as well, so Plunder can end up feeling like Team Deathmatch at certain hotspots like Al Mazrah City, Observatory, and Airport as players continuously drop in.

Play at your own pace

Player in a Plunder match in Warzone 2.0.

The best thing about Plunder is how it lets people play and progress at their own pace. In Battle Royale, players are forced to move alongside the deadly gas, which can make it difficult to learn the ins and outs of certain points of interest as the gas influences how players maneuver throughout a match. Thankfully, Plunder doesn’t include a gas mechanic, meaning you’re free to explore and take in the sights however you see fit during the time limit. The ability to spawn in with custom loadouts was also a welcome addition, as I could spend more time using my favorite weapons and learning how to use new ones instead of utilizing ground loot.

Plunder is also a fantastic way to level up my weapons thanks to the sheer number of engagements. Battling opponents earns players valuable weapon XP; in turn, this allows players to quickly earn the best attachments. Those who don’t feel like racking up a slew of eliminations to earn lots of XP can also take a more passive approach by completing nearby contracts. Either way, there are lots of options for leveling up weapons within Plunder, making match-to-match progression more consistent than Battle Royale.

Two characters from Warzone 2.0 Season 3.

Since Plunder matches play a lot less competitively than Battle Royale, it appeals a wider degree of skill levels as well. It’s unclear if the skill-based matchmaking is any different in Plunder compared to Battle Royale, but the general feeling is that you’re less likely to come across only expert players (or newcomers). The wide range of skill levels found in Plunder makes each match feel varied, with plenty of fun to be had throughout. Some games I played felt extremely intense, as enemy players carefully coordinated to emerge victorious, while other matches filled with newcomers made it easier for me to win. No two matches feel the same, as the mode caters to a more diverse set of players.

Plunder certainly doesn’t solve all of Warzone 2.0’s problems, but it’s a refreshing mode that feels distinct from Battle Royale in all of the right ways. It’s an excellent way to practice getting into gunfights and caters to casuals as well as veteran players across the board.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Joseph Yaden
Joseph Yaden is a freelance journalist who covers Nintendo, shooters, and horror games. He mostly covers game guides for…
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0’s overpowered new DMZ bundle ignites pay-to-win fears
Character calling in killstreak in Warzone 2.0.

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 has struggled to retain players due to odd gameplay decisions and controversial mechanics that have divided the community. A new feature, though, has players especially up in arms.

Recently, publisher Activision released an in-game store bundle that some players consider a "pay-to-win" option, stirring up criticism once again. The paid bundle, "Roze and Thorn," gives DMZ players a free unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) that temporarily reveals the locations of enemy players at the start of a match, immediately offering an advantage.

Read more
Warzone 2.0’s one-shot snipers are hard to use. Try this weapon instead
Character holding sniper in Warzone 2.0.

Activision finally added the ability to earn one-hit kills with certain snipers as part of Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 Season 3. This was a much-needed update that makes heavy rifles more viable. However, this comes with a major caveat, as the only way to earn a one-hit kill is by utilizing explosive rounds on a small selection of snipers, which absolutely tanks a weapon's bullet velocity.

This makes it extremely difficult to actually hit your shots, so inexperienced players won't really reap the benefits of the newly-added one-shot capabilities. However, there is an alternative solution that everyone should try, as it's a viable option that works well at long distances.

Read more
Even in Season 3, Warzone 2.0 still feels like it’s in beta
Two characters from Warzone 2.0 Season 3.

Activision hyped its Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 Season 3 update considerably ,with numerous blog posts showcasing what to expect, along with a content creator call that detailed a slew of highly requested features. Now that the update is live, some members of the game's community are left feeling misled, as Season 3 isn't quite the radical change they were expecting.

While it does include new features and fix some of the sequel's long-standing issues, Warzone 2.0 is still packed with problems -- many of which make the game less approachable. Season 3 is a step in the right direction, but considering just how low the bar was before its release, it's not as impressive as it perhaps needs to be at this stage in the game's life, especially from a massive studio such as Activision.
New toys

Read more