Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Apple’s long-delayed BeatsX wireless headphones will be released February 10

BeatsX
Last year was a rough one for Apple when it came to headphones. Its own true wireless headphones, the AirPods, were originally scheduled to ship in October, but only became available for purchase in December. That same day, another audio product from the company — the BeatsX wireless earphones — had its release pushed back to February 2017. Fortunately, Apple has held to its word, and the headphones will arrive later this week.

Alongside the launch of the iPhone 7, the first not to include a headphone jack, Apple announced a total of four wireless headphone options: the AirPods, and three Beats-branded products, all of which are powered by its W1 chip. The two other Beats products announced — the Solo3 and the Powerbeats3 — shipped in 2016.

It seemed that the headphones’ release was imminent when models began showing up in various Apple stores, but as of this morning, the product page for the BeatsX still simply reads that the headphones are coming in February 2017. The official release date was instead revealed by the official Beats By Dre Twitter account via a tweet containing a short video clip and the words “available Feb. 10.”

Apple has yet to confirm the reason behind the delay of its AirPods or the BeatsX, but the fact that both products use the W1 chip could have something to do with the delay — but it wouldn’t explain why the Solo3 and Powerbeats3, also powered by the W1 chip, have launched without issue.

Unlike those headphones, which recharge via Micro USB, the BeatsX use a Lightning port to recharge. The BeatsX also feature a Fast Fuel feature that promises users two hours of playback from a five-minute charge. This also may have had something to do with the delay, but for now, we have no way of knowing what the culprit is.

Once the BeatsX are available, they will retail for $150. If you’d rather opt for something else, the Beats Powerbeats3 sell for $200, while Apple’s AirPods sell for $160.

Story originally published on December 16, 2016. Updated by Kris Wouk on 02-07-2017: Edited to add the official release information for the Beats X. 

Editors' Recommendations

Kris Wouk
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kris Wouk is a tech writer, gadget reviewer, blogger, and whatever it's called when someone makes videos for the web. In his…
Apple iPhone 11 Pro vs. iPhone XS vs. iPhone X
Apple iPhone 11 Pro

Apple's trio of iPhones for 2019 brought us a range of upgrades, as always, and they also marked a new naming convention. The iPhone 11 built on the iPhone XR, while the iPhone 11 Pro replaced the iPhone XS, and the iPhone 11 Pro Max replaced the iPhone XS Max. If you're shopping for a more recent iPhone, then you'll be keen to know what last year's iPhone has to offer compared to the versions from 2018 and 2017. Grab a drink, kick back and relax, as we unpack the differences between the iPhone 11 Pro, the iPhone XS, and the iPhone X.

Looking for discounts across the iPhone range? Check out the best iPhone deals and the best smartphone sales available now.
Specs

Read more
Powerbeats Pro vs. Powerbeats3: Which Beats wireless earphones are right for you?
oprah got it right with these tech gifts sony beats and more powerbeats pro  1

It can be difficult to land a pair of exceptional earbuds, especially when you consider how many brands there are and that each company produces a plethora of tiered models. When it comes to the Powerbeats lineup of buds (Apple-owned since 2014), two classic contenders are the Powerbeats3 and the Powerbeats Pro.

The Powerbeats3 are designed for working out, they blast seriously heavy bass, and, unlike the AirPods and their ilk, they're handcuffed together by a wire. These days, you can find a pair online from $75 to around $125, although supplies are limited.

Read more
Windows 10 can run better virtualized on Apple’s M1 Macs than on Surface Pro X
everything apple announced at its one more thing event m1 macbook pro 13

Windows 10 and some ARM-based Windows 10 apps can perform better when virtualized on Apple's new M1 Macs than it can when running natively on a native ARM-device like the Surface Pro X. That's according to a new video posted on YouTube featuring a benchmarking experience.

In the tests, Windows 10 on Apple's new M1 Mac Mini benchmarked with a 1,515 Single-Core score, and a 4,998 Multi-Core score when virtualized. That's well ahead of what's recorded natively with the Surface Pro X, which picks up a 764 single-core score, and a 2,983 multi-core score.

Read more