Skip to main content

It’s deja vu all over again for HBO, Discovery — and the new Max

“Today you will hear about our incredible content, our extraordinary products, and our plans to bring it all to market.”

“We’re fully committed to continuing this great legacy of storytelling on HBO Max, but we also know that equally important is a fantastic user experience.”

“We all know about the paradox of choice. If you’re surrounded by too many options, you end up less satisfied with your final decision than if you’d been given fewer options in the first place.”

Those were three sentences spoken by a longtime television executive on a stage filled with dark purple and blue lights, announcing a new streaming service. But it wasn’t this week’s announcement from Warner Bros. Discovery of a newish streaming service that combines HBO Max and Discovery content under one roof, with the new (if uninspired) name, Max.

And those quotes were from October 2019, when Warner Bros. (then owned by AT&T) was announcing the shift from HBO Now and HBO Go to, simply, HBO Max — a full half-year before that service would actually be available to subscribers.

Former WarnerMedia executive Robert Greenblatt in October 2019.
Former WarnerMedia executive Robert Greenblatt announcing the HBO Max streaming service in October 2019. WarnerMedia

Fast forward to April 12, 2023. Different executives. Same color scheme. And, in so many ways, the same story.

Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav kicked off an hourlong event to unveil the new Max by telling the story of the legacy of Warner Bros. in Hollywood. “A century of storytelling,” he said from the same Stage 14 that saw such films as Casablanca and A Streetcar Named Desire. “This is our time. This is our chance. And everything is possible — especially with the media assets, the storytelling IP, and the amazing creative talent that we have here at Warner Bros. Discovery. I feel like for our company this is our rendezvous with destiny. What stories are we going to tell that will define our legacy? That we’ll look back on years from now and say ‘We did that. We told those stories.’ ”

Lofty words, indeed. But there’s simply no denying that it’s essentially the same story that was told merely three years ago. New branding. New content. New subscribers. To be fair, and extremely understated, a lot changed over those three years. A pandemic did its best to kill off the theater industry. A shift to streaming-first proved to be short-lived for feature films while opening the door for more TV-friendly fare to hit more eyeballs sooner.

HBO Max was an attempt to simplify the confusing streaming scheme that HBO found itself in. There was the legacy HBO service, itself served by HBO Go and HBO Now. (In case you forgot, the former was for those who had a legacy subscription via cable or satellite, and the latter for those who wanted streaming only.) But it wasn’t a clean break. Everything HBO was available on HBO Max, but not the other way around.

Amid all that was the financial situation — something those all-important consumers don’t actually care about. AT&T owned Warner Bros. as part of WarnerMedia, which never really made sense for a legacy telecom company. And so spinoffs and mergers happened — with Discovery and Zaslav taking a staring role — other remaining execs moved on (willingly or not), and everyone gets to pretend that they’re launching an all-new streaming service in 2023.

Warner Bros. Discovery executive JB Perrette on stage at the Max launch event.
Warner Bros. Discovery executive JB Perrette on stage at the Max launch event on April 12, 2023. Warner Bros. Discovery

“Our enhanced streaming service — that’s what we’re all here for,” Zaslav continued “is playing a staring role. And we named it ‘Max.’ And as you’ll see today, Max offers consumers something truly distinct and appealing.”

That’s all corporate marketing talk, of course. It’s the thing you say when you have to say the thing.

“Max is the one to watch,” said Zaslav, finally forcing the new Max tagline into the conversation. “It’s the one to watch because it’s the place every member of the household can go to see exactly what they want at any given time.”

That’s true, unless that thing happens to not be on Max, and instead is found on one of the other major services, like Paramount+, Disney+, or Netflix. (Or even the much smaller Hulu.) While Max may have more movies and shows in one place than either HBO or Discovery did on their own, it’s not suddenly the only player in town. The key will be to consistently put out new shows and movies that keep subscribers from leaving. (Again, that’s not exactly a new strategy.)

There’s nothing particularly new in the Max price, either. In fact, execs made a big deal about how the Max subscription would cost the same as HBO Max. Except that’s not really true, since 4K content will now cost more and require an “Ultimate” plan.

And talk of the new Max tech platform also was reminiscent of that 2019 HBO Max preview event — never mind that HBO Max has had more than its share of technical issues across multiple platforms. Maybe the new Max tech stack will fix that. Or maybe it’ll just mean new kinks to work out. We’ll have to wait and see on that one.

The bottom line is that all the corporate platitudes aside, nobody has reinvented the wheel with Max. For the most part, it appears to be an exercise in rebranding and changing up the platform on which we use it. Neither of those are small things. And they’re a good place to start building on the streaming legacy as Warner Bros. enters its second century of existence.

Let’s just see if that legacy manages to last longer than three years this time.

Editors' Recommendations

Phil Nickinson
Section Editor, Audio/Video
Phil spent the 2000s making newspapers with the Pensacola (Fla.) News Journal, the 2010s with Android Central and then the…
Does HBO Max think you’re dumb?
hbo max discount while content cut 1

You can't swing a dead cat in the entertainment space these days without running into a headline about how the newly combined Warner Bros. Discovery — which owns HBO Max — has canceled a show that was in the planning stages. Or already was in production. Or had finished production but now will never see the light of day. Or canceled any future episodes or seasons of a strong show. Or left another in limbo. Or killed a weekly news show that was more important than not. Or unceremoniously removed hundreds of episodes from literally the most important children's series in the history of television.

Fine. That's business. The newly combined Warner Bros. Discovery reportedly is trying to shave a mere $3 billion off the balance sheet, and cuts of content and people were always going to happen.

Read more
Combined HBO Max/Discovery+ streaming service to launch in summer 2023
HBO Max and Discovery+ app icons.

We're finally starting to get a little clarity about what the future looks like for HBO Max and Discovery, which now fall under the same roof, causing a bit of a shockwave in the entertainment industry not just from the platform side, but more recently by taking a pretty heavy hatchet to shows and movies.

During Thursday's second-quarter earnings call, executives of the new Warner Bros. Discovery said to expect the launch of a new service that combines HBO Max and Discovery+ in the summer of 2023. The United States is up first, with 39 counties in Latin America to follow later in the year. Europe will launch in 2024 — though that doesn't currently include the U.K. and Germany, followed by Asia-Pacific and new markets later in that year. It's possible that some markets may see an accelerated rollout, however.

Read more
CNN+ is shutting down two days earlier than it first said
CNN Plus as seen on the CNN website.

You know things are broken on the corporate side of things when even the execution gets moved up. CNN+ will cease streaming on April 28, according to an email sent do subscribers. That's two days sooner than was previously announced.

This, of course, is the definition of a moot point. Whether CNN+ dies on April 28 or April 30 doesn't matter at all — it'll be just as dead. But it just goes to show the dysfunction behind the scenes following the merger of WarnerMedia, which owned CNN, with Discovery, and the executive shake-up that followed.

Read more