Skip to main content

Apple Goes with Intel: Anticipating the Other Shoe and Looking Ahead

Apple announced today that they had been anticipating the move to Intel from the moment Steve Jobs returned to the company with a version of the OS ready to make the move.  To the Apple loyalist, this has to come as a massive blow; during all of this time Steve and Apple have been adamant that the PowerPC was vastly better than the x86.   Had any of them read the recent unauthorized biography, iCon Steve Jobs:  The Greatest Second Act in the History of Business, they likely would have been able to better anticipate this and subsequent moves.  

Steve wants desperately to take Bill Gates?s position as the most powerful technology guy on the planet.   He can?t get there with Apple (or actually with any hardware), which suggests that the ?Other Shoe? will eventually be the move away from PC hardware into a software-only pure play.  This would allow him to enjoy similar margins to what Microsoft enjoys and, as he believes (and has often demonstrated), he has a better idea of what users want in a product than Microsoft does. 

Recommended Videos

This will clearly put massive pressure on Microsoft to deliver their new operating system on time, as it will face a renewed Apple on Intel in 2007.  This would not only avoid the blood bath that Apple enjoyed during the Windows 95 roll out; it has the potential, if executed sharply, to reverse it.  

Looking Ahead to 2006

The next two years will be particularly difficult for Apple.  Already we are seeing reports of building iPod inventories as the ?coolness? of the product declines with age.  This decline was apparently helped by the iPod Shuffle, which people, particularly kids, thought of as a ?poser? product, detracting from the exclusiveness that made the overall line so attractive and popular.  The iPod line has been, for the most part, carrying the company through some difficult times, and if that revenue continues to decline, it could return Apple to unprofitability and put massive pressure on the executive team to make a series of short term decisions?one of which could be to reverse the move to Intel. 

On the PC hardware side?  if you?re a company called Osborn, you don?t announce new hardware long before it is available (otherwise, people stop buying what you do have and that can crater hardware sales.)   In this case, while some will show up in 2006, most of the high margin products won?t show up until 2007, which will make the second half of 2005 and most of 2006 particularly nasty unless Apple can bring another market winning product in to cover the gap. 

Such a product is possible; certainly the market is not really taken by the Sony PSP, which was the heir apparent for the next cool thing (largely thanks to Sony), and the Xbox really falls into another class of product.  Still, coming out with hit after hit can be problematic, and the Shuffle appears to have been more of a problem than a help here.   However, if any company can do it Apple probably can, though betting on it remains incredibly risky given the stakes.  

Looking Ahead to 2007

In 2007, Apple and Microsoft will be pitted against each other on similar hardware, both with strong Intel backing.  This has never happened before and, as noted above, it could potentially not only offset what likely would have been a market share bath reminiscent of 1995, but reverse it.  Microsoft?s next generation OS will be two years late at launch and it is already being positioned in the media as little more than a minor patch over Windows XP. 

While it will clearly be more than this, the media has long been anticipating a viable challenger to Windows, and Linux simply has not lived up to this challenge in a general sense.  The MacOS does have this potential and it could be a powerful (and much more acceptable) alternative to both Linux and Windows in 2007, if Apple can execute sharply.

Overall, this will be an incredibly exciting time for Apple, Linux and Windows, as competition will force all three to improve at an increasing rate; this has to be good for consumers, assuming that quality isn?t compromised by the process.  For Apple, they may want to remember that ?What doesn?t kill you only makes you stronger,? and for Microsoft, it may be a case of Apple being back and ?boy, are they pissed.?

Rob Enderle
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Rob is President and Principal Analyst of the Enderle Group, a forward-looking emerging technology advisory firm. Before…
If this is what an Apple smart ring could look like, I need it right now
An Apple smart ring concept by Jonas Daehnert

Forget the Apple Vision Pro. What many users really might want to see is an Apple smart ring. A new concept shows what one of these first-generation wearables could look like. Consider me sold, Apple; where can I lay down my credit card?

There have been rumors in recent years about the possibility of Apple releasing a smart ring that would compete with the Oura Ring and the long-rumored Samsung Galaxy Ring. If Apple were to release such a device, it would likely track various health metrics to help users understand their sleep patterns, activity levels, and overall health. Essentially, it would be like an Apple Watch for your finger.

Read more
Here’s our first look at OnePlus’ next Apple Watch killer
Leaked render of OnePlus Watch 2.

OnePlus’ first attempt at making a smartwatch was mostly a meh attempt, even though it looked extremely sleek. The biggest drawback, of course, was the software. It was essentially a bare-bones software reskinning atop a very basic real-time operating system (RTOS) foundation.
Put simply, it was a not an app-loving operating system and was far away from the deep functional goodness that the likes of Google’s Wear OS and Apple’s watchOS have to offer. The second attempt, which just surfaced online, could atone for those sins.
Leaker OnLeaks (via MySmartPrice) has shared alleged renders of the second-generation OnePlus Watch. Instead of mimicking what Samsung and Fossil have done with their smartwatches, OnePlus seems to be chasing an original design that blends a round dial and a flattened right edge reminiscent of Casio’s G-Shock series timepieces.

The metallic arms extend a little further from the main frame compared to what we’ve seen on Samsung’s recent Galaxy Watches. It’s a subjective aesthetic deviation, but from the top, it seems the arms could offer a more secure grip on the strap attachments.
But the juiciest elements of the latest leak are the chip inside and the software shift it could bring to the table. OnePlus will reportedly go for the Qualcomm Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 chip, a wearable platform that is a familiar name in the Wear OS territory. 
The leaked report doesn’t explicitly go into the details of a OnePlus-ified Wear OS experience on the smartwatch, but that Qualcomm chip is a little too overpowered for RTOS, so there’s that. There's also a separate report from leaker Max Jambor, who claims that the OnePlus Watch 2 will indeed be powered by Wear OS — specifically, Wear OS 4.
https://twitter.com/MaxJmb/status/1723031095896076776?s=20
Embracing Wear OS not only saves OnePlus the trouble of managing an entirely custom software experience on its own — it also adds a whole dimension of convenience for users. The biggest and most notable advantage would be the availability of apps and seamless cross-device linking with Android phones.

Read more
This year’s Apple Watch Pride band looks better than you might think
Pride Edition 2023 Sport Band on Series 5 on wrist

It’s June, which means it’s officially Pride Month. Even if you aren’t a member of the LGBQT+ community, you can show your support as an ally in various ways — and it can be as simple as wearing Pride-themed merchandise.

Apple is no stranger to Pride Month, as it has released several Pride Edition Apple Watch bands in the past few years. The bands have come in most of the style varieties that Apple offers, including the Sport Band, Sport Loop, Braided Solo Loop, Nike Sport Band, and even the discontinued woven nylon band styles.

Read more