Skip to main content

Relax, the EU’s scary USB-C rule won’t rob you of fast-charging benefits

The EU lawmakers have approved a new mandate that will require a wide range of electronic devices to adopt the USB–C standard for charging. The European Parliament’s overwhelming decision covers everything from smartphones and laptops to digital cameras and headphones.

The first key takeaway? Adios, Lightning port! You won’t be missed. The EU’s updated rule, which comes into effect in 2024, is premised on the hope that by standardizing the charging port, customers will no longer have to spend money on proprietary chargers covering Apple’s Lightning port on iPhones and Microsoft’s Surface Connect socket for laptops.

A blue iPhone 12 sits next to a lightning charger.
Viktollio/Shutterstock

From a customer’s perspective, it’s a landmark decision that will ease the burden on every buyer’s wallet. In doing so, Earth’s environmental burden of the mounting e-waste problem will also ease. But before we dig into the details, it is important to know the devices that are covered under the EU’s USB-C ruling. Take a look:

Covered: Smartphones, tablets, video game consoles, cameras, headphones, and headsets.

Exempted: Earbuds, smartwatches, and fitness trackers.

It reads scary, but don’t worry!

The likes of Apple and Samsung – which have removed chargers and earphones from phone retail packages in the name of environmental protection – should have no problem acclimatizing to the change. However, there is one piece of information in the press release that was frighteningly bewildering. Here it is:

“All devices that support fast charging will now have the same charging speed, allowing users to charge their devices at the same speed with any compatible charger.”

SuperVOOC fast charging active on the Find X5 Pro.
Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

It seems as if the EU not only wants to standardize the USB-C port and adopt a one-charger-fits-all policy, it also seeks to harmonize the charging speed. More specifically, fast charging. If that sounds worrisome, let me put it in clear words: Do not worry!

In an emailed response to Digital Trends, EU Press Officer Yasmina Yakimova cleared that the new rule is “not legislating on the speed limits.” Instead, it just wants to make sure that manufacturers aren’t “limiting the charging speed unjustifiably and to ensure that the charging speed is the same when using any compatible device.”

The solution to those concerns? USB-PD — aka Power Delivery. For all the devices covered under the new rule, USB-PD support is now mandatory. So, does that mean other charging protocols will be banned? No. Instead, the EU makes it abundantly clear that “other charging protocols are still allowed provided that they do not impede the full functionality of the common harmonized solution.”

Everyone wins

Moving forward, every device will carry a detailed label that will reveal two critical pieces of information. First, it will clearly tell users how much power (in watts) is required to charge it optimally. This “optimal” charging number is the baseline for offering a no-compromise experience.

Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro with a USB-C cable
Nadeem Sarwar /digitalTrends

However, if the device supports fast charging, the label will inform users about it. The prerequisite is that the fast charging experience must be delivered via a USB-C port. So, if a brand like Xiaomi has developed 120W charging, it will continue to be on the table.

Xiaomi, or any other brand for that matter, won’t be forced to abandon their proprietary fast charging technology and lose its competitive edge against rivals like Samsung and Apple. The only key criterion is that the brand in question must support the USB-PD standard on its phones, or any other eligible device.

“The proposal aims to enable consumers to easily compare the charging performance and interoperability of the electronic device and the charger, and match them as appropriate,” says a Q&A section on the European Commission’s website.

In a nutshell, if a company doesn’t impede or go below the minimum USB-PD ratings outlined by the EU for a product, it can develop and sell faster-charging gear for its products. The rule won’t stifle innovation, and the average buyer will now have clear information about the charger capabilities of their next device.

Editors' Recommendations

Nadeem Sarwar
Nadeem is a tech journalist who started reading about cool smartphone tech out of curiosity and soon started writing…
Apple confirms USB-C is coming to iPhones, but it’s still bitter about it
The Lightning port on the iPhone 14 Pro Max.

Apple is going to embrace the USB-C port for iPhones, ditching the Lightning standard that it has held on tightly for years. In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Apple’s Senior Vice President of Worldwide Marketing, Greg Joswiak, confirmed that Apple is going to comply with the EU’s decision of mandatorily putting a USB-C port for a wide range of electronic gadgets, including iPhones.

“Obviously, we’ll have to comply,” Joswiak told Joanna Stern when quizzed about the transition away from Lightning to the eventual USB-C destiny for iPhones. “We have no choice as we do around the world to comply to local laws. But we think the approach would have been better environmentally, and better for our customers to not have a government be that prescriptive,” he added.

Read more
It’s official: Apple is required to make a USB-C iPhone by 2024
Brand new USB-C type to Lightning fast charging cable of with iPhone 11 Pro Max

The European Parliament today approved a regulation that would mandate a common charger for all electronics sold in the bloc in a bid to reduce e-waste. These include smartphones and tablets. While most smartphones and tablets currently sold in the EU do use USB-C, one particular holdout has been Apple. With this new rule, the next iPhone (or the one after that) will have to ditch Lightning for USB-C, bringing it in line with the iPad Pro and Macbook lines.

While the law only applies in Europe, Apple would have to either design an iPhone specifically for Europe or adopt USB-C worldwide. It's easy to see which path the company's picking, especially with American and Indian politicians making similar legislative noises.

Read more
iPhone 14 Pro vs. iPhone 13 Pro camera battle isn’t as close as you think
The iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 13 Pro seen from the back.

If you’re looking longingly at the new iPhone 14 Pro and wondering just how good the camera is, and whether it's better than the Apple phone that’s already in your pocket, we’ve got the answer for you. Over the first few days with the 14 Pro, I’ve taken several hundred photos with it and the iPhone 13 Pro, ready to put the two against each other in a battle that’s sure to get heated.
iPhone 14 Pro vs. iPhone 13 Pro camera specifications
You can see a complete breakdown of what’s new with the iPhone 14 Pro compared to the iPhone 13 Pro, but we’re only concerned with the cameras for this test. Apple has made some changes with the new generation. The iPhone 14 Pro has a new 48-megapixel main camera with an f/1.78 aperture, second-generation optical image stabilization, and its Deep Fusion, Smart HDR 4, and new Photonic Engine features. It's joined by a 12MP ultra-wide camera and a 12MP telephoto camera with a 3x optical zoom.

The iPhone 13 Pro has three 12MP cameras on the back. The main camera has Apple’s previous generation optical image stabilization and an f/1.5 aperture, while the telephoto also has a 3x optical zoom. On the software side, the phone also has Deep Fusion and Smart HDR 4 technology but doesn’t have the new Photonic Engine. The two phones use different processors, with the A15 Bionic powering the iPhone 13 Pro, and the A16 Bionic in the iPhone 14 Pro. On the front is a 12MP selfie camera, but the 14 Pro gets the Photonic Engine and an f/1.9 aperture.

Read more