Skip to main content

The FBI doesn’t like phone encryption, says it makes crimes harder to solve

” id=”attachment_672160″]fbi device encryption hinders crime solving
”[Image
Phone encryption is currently a hot topic in the mobile world, therefore it was only a matter of time until the FBI commented on such technology. The agency did just that in a speech at the Brookings Institution in Washington, delivered by FBI director James B. Comey and reported by The New York Times.

In the speech, Comey warned that, due to companies like Apple and Google using sophisticated encryption technology, the FBI cannot access information that could make the difference between solving and not solving a crime. “Unfortunately, the law hasn’t kept pace with technology, and this disconnect has created a significant public safety problem,” said Comey.

More specifically, the law Comey refers to is the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, that mandates phone companies to include an ability to begin wiretapping, so long as they are presented with a court order. The problem with the law, Comey stated, is that online services, such as Facebook and Gmail, are not bound by it. Since 2010 the FBI has pushed for an update, but to no avail, leading Comey to warn the FBI’s ability to carry out wiretap orders is “going dark.”

A related query Comey brought up had to do with companies providing end-to-end encryption as part of their communications systems. Comey believes this is an increasing trend, one that could make lawbreaking an easier endeavor.

“Those charged with protecting our people aren’t always able to access the evidence we need to prosecute crime and prevent terrorism, even with lawful authority,” said Comey. “We have the legal authority to intercept and access communications and information pursuant to court order, but we often lack the technical ability to do so.”

Comey’s comments come at a time when Apple opted to put user data behind password-protected encryption that Apple itself can’t access. Google, meanwhile, has offered device encryption for a few years, though users have to switch it on in the device’s settings. Starting with Android Lollipop, however, encryption is turned on by default.

Meanwhile, companies such as Silent Circle have centered their business models around providing top-of-the-line privacy measures, in an attempt to capitalize on the focus placed on privacy nowadays. The end results have included the Blackphone and Tor, among other products.

Comey’s comments don’t just butt heads with companies, however; they also conflict with the American Civil Liberties Union. “Federal law explicitly protects the right of companies to add encryption with no back doors,” said director of the group’s Washington legislative office Laura Murphy, in a statement sent to The New York Times. “Whether the FBI calls it a front door or a back door, any effort by the FBI to weaken encryption leaves our highly personal information and our business information vulnerable to hacking by foreign governments and criminals.”

Silicon Valley executives, such as Facebook general counsel Colin Stretch and Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt, believe that encryption is no longer simply an option: it is a necessity. Without encryption, there could be severe ramifications for the technology industry as a whole.

Editors' Recommendations

Williams Pelegrin
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…
With the iPhone 14 Pro, Apple is about to make the ‘normal’ iPhone boring
A white iPhone 13 standing upright on a table.

Apple's iPhone 14 is likely launching in a little over two months, and we already have a fairly good picture ofwhat's coming. This year, Apple is predicted to make three changes that'll differentiate the base iPhone 14 from its more Pro siblings. It'll come with a different design, a weaker camera, and an inferior chipset.

Apple has differentiated its iPhones in terms of screen quality and materials before, but this marks the first time the baseline iPhone is going to be markedly inferior to the Pro model.
Apple adopts a tried-and-true strategy

Read more
The iPhone SE (2022) vs. Galaxy A53 camera test doesn’t go as you’d expect
The Galaxy A53 and iPhone SE 2022's camera lenses.

Samsung or Apple? It’s a common question among tech fans, and there’s never an easy answer. Here, we’ve got two of the brand’s most popular devices facing off against each other in a camera shootout, but instead of putting the most expensive models into battle, it’s a pair of far cheaper ones — the Apple iPhone SE (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G.

Is it a fair fight? The Galaxy A53 comes with four cameras on the back, making it look far superior next to the iPhone SE (2022)'s lowly single camera. And even the selfie camera on Samsung's phone has more than four times the amount of megapixels! Surely, this is a battle that can only go one way? Well, not necessarily.
What are the differences?

Read more
Apple’s iPhone workaround doesn’t excuse bad MacBook webcams
iPhone being used as a Mac webcam.

Apple has turned the iPhone into a webcam for the Mac, officially. You'll now look sharp in video calls with centered focus wizardry, and even some bokeh magic thrown into the mix. If you're an Android phone loyalist, you're stuck using your pricey MacBook's not-so-good webcam. It's a stop-gap solution and a sign that Mac webcams aren't getting the same "revolutionary" upgrades as the silicon inside those machines.

One can argue that there is only so much space to fit snazzy camera hardware beneath the thin lid of a MacBook. But the problem is not exclusive to Apple's laptops. The Mac Studio external display, armed with a 12-megapixel camera and will burn a $1,600-sized hole in your wallet, also garnered less-than-stellar reviews for its webcam performance.

Read more