Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Pixel 3a vs. Pixel 3 vs. Pixel 2: Which Google phone is perfect for you?

Pixel 3a Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

Fans of the Google Nexus range have something to be excited about: There’s a new midrange Google phone in town, and it’s a beauty. The Pixel 3a has been revealed at Google I/O 2019, and it has everything we loved about the Google Pixel 3 wrapped up in a more affordable bundle. But price is only one part of the story, and there are inevitable comparisons with the new phone’s stablemates. So within the pint-sized Pixel pantheon, which phone comes out on top? We compared the Google Pixel 3a, the Pixel 3, and the Pixel 2 to find out.

Specs

Pixel 3a Pixel 3 Pixel 2
Size 151.3 x 70.1 x 8.2 mm (6.0 x 2.8 x 0.3 inches) 145.6 x 68.2 x 7.9 mm (5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches) 145.7 x 69.7 x 7.8 mm (5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches)
Weight 147 grams (5.19 ounces) 148 grams (5.22 ounces) 143 grams (5.04 ounces)
Screen size 5.6-inch gOLED 5.5-inch OLED 5-inch OLED
Screen resolution 2,220 x 1,080 pixels (441 pixels per inch) 2,160 x 1,080 pixels (443 pixels per inch) 1,920 x 1,080 pixels (441 pixels per inch)
Operating system Android 9.0 Pie Android 9.0 Pie Android 9.0 Pie
Storage space 64GB 64GB, 128GB 64GB, 128GB
MicroSD card slot No No No
Tap-to-pay services Google Pay Google Pay Google Pay
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
RAM 4GB 4GB 4GB
Camera Single 12.2MP rear, 8MP front camera Single 12.2MP rear, dual 8MP and 8MP front camera Single 12.2MP rear, 8MP front camera
Video 2160p at 30 frames per second, 1080p at 120 fps, 720p at 240 fps 2160p at 30 frames per second, 1080p at 120 fps, 720p at 240 fps 2160p at 30 frames per second, 1080p at 120 fps, 720p at 240 fps
Bluetooth version Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.0
Ports USB-C, 3.5mm audio jack USB-C USB-C
Fingerprint sensor Yes (rear-mounted) Yes (rear-mounted) Yes (rear-mounted)
Water resistance Splash resistant IP68 IP67
Battery 3,000mAh

18W fast charging

2,915mAh

Fast charging

Qi wireless charging

2,700mAh

Fast charging

App marketplace Google Play Store Google Play Store Google Play Store
Network support T-Mobile, AT&T, Verizon, Sprint AT&T, T-Mobile, Sprint, Verizon T-Mobile, AT&T, Verizon, Sprint
Colors Just Black, Clearly White, Purple-ish Just Black, Clearly White, Not Pink Kinda Blue, Just Black, Clearly White
Price $400 $800 $650
Buy from Google Google, Amazon Amazon
Review score 4.5 out of 5 stars 4.5 out of 5 stars 4 out of 5 stars

Performance, battery life, and charging

Google Pixel 3 review
Simon Hill/Digital Trends

Stock Android makes judging these phones difficult. A Pixel is always going to be super-smooth to use, and these three phones are no exception. There’s a winner in terms of objective power though, with the Pixel 3’s Snapdragon 845 making short work of the Pixel 2’s older Snapdragon 835. The Pixel 3a uses the midrange Snapdragon 670, which simply won’t match the Pixel 3’s strength — though it does surprisingly well against the Pixel 2’s benchmark scores.

Battery capacity has been steadily increasing, with the Pixel 3a sporting the largest battery of the three here. Unlike the Pixel 3, there’s never any need for battery anxiety, and the midrange phone performs excellently, providing good battery life for a solid day’s work. Charging is where the latest flagship starts to pull away; all three sport Google’s fast charging, but only the Pixel 3 comes with convenient Qi wireless charging.

While all three are very smooth performers, the Pixel 3’s more powerful processor and Qi wireless charging win it this round.

Winner: Pixel 3

Design and durability

Google’s designs for the Pixel range have generally split opinion, with many branding the phones as ugly. They have a point — Google was slow to embrace the design trends adopted by other manufacturers, and so none of these phones are a match for the Samsung Galaxy S10 or the iPhone XS. The Pixel 2 is the worst of these three due to extensive bezels. The Pixel 3 and 3a are the better-looking by far, with slimmer bezels. The Pixel 3a is also the only phone to include a headphone jack.

The Pixel 3a is made from polycarbonate, while the Pixel 3 and Pixel 2 are made from more luxurious materials. The Pixel 3 is all glass, while the Pixel 2 has an aluminum body with a glass panel at the top. The glass sections will be fragile of course, but the Pixel 2’s aluminum and the Pixel 3a’s polycarbonate are likely to be more durable over time. Still, a case is recommended for all three. The Pixel 3 has an advantage in waterproofing too, thanks to an IP68-rating that’s slightly superior to the Pixel 2’s IP67-rating. The Pixel 3a only has splash- and dust-resistance, so won’t survive submersion.

It’s a tougher round to call, with a lot going for each phone. However, we think the Pixel 3’s more attractive design and strong waterproofing put it ahead here.

Winner: Pixel 3

Display

Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

Google has compromised in some areas to bring the Pixel 3a’s price down to midrange levels, but the display doesn’t seem to be one of those areas. It’s a 5.6-inch gOLED display in an 18.5:9 aspect ratio with a 2,280 x 1,080 resolution. It’s slightly larger than the Pixel 3’s 5.5-inch display, and considerably larger than the Pixel 2’s 5-inch display. The larger size means it’s not quite as sharp as the flagships, but as an OLED, you can be sure it comes with a great color range and inky blacks.

While the Pixel 3a puts up a strong fight, we favor the Pixel 3’s screen.

Winner: Pixel 3

Camera

Pixel 3a Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

Despite sticking with a single rear-facing lens, the camera has always been one of the Pixel range’s biggest strengths. Each phone comes with the now iconic 12.2-megapixel main lens, featuring a great portrait mode, A.I. optimization, and software tricks like Night Sight and Top Shot. The Pixel 3 and 2 have an edge thanks to the Visual Core feature, which boosts processing times and overall camera performance. But it’s important to note that all three phones offer a great camera experience.

The Pixel 3a and Pixel 2 come with a similar 8-megapixel selfie lens — though the Pixel 3a’s has a fixed focus — but the Pixel 3’s additional selfie lens gives it another edge. The Pixel 3 sports two 8-megapixel lenses, the second of which has a wide-angle lens that allows it to take pictures of large groups. This additional lens paired with its Visual Core scores the Pixel 3 the win here, but it’s a close contest.

Winner: Pixel 3

Software and updates

Google Pixel 3
Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

As the Pixel is Google’s own device, it’s only right you’d find the latest version of Android 9.0 Pie on these phones. It’ll be exactly the same version of Android Pie no matter which phone you pick up right now, as Google is exceptionally good at pushing updates out to its phones regularly and on time. Each phone gets three years of major Android upgrades and security updates from its release date, so while the Pixel 2 will be the first of these three phones to stop receiving updates, it will definitely receive Android 10 Q, and might even stretch to Android R in 2020. As such, there’s not much need to worry about getting value for your money, even when picking up the Pixel 2.

There’s no way to pick between these three choices here, as they’re all exactly the same.

Winner: Tie

Special features

Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

But it’s the newer phones that pull slightly ahead. The Pixel 3 comes with support for the Google Pixel Stand to turn your phone into a smart display, while the Pixel 3a will be the first phone to come with support for Google Maps’ new AR mode. While the Pixel 2 is by no means lacking in features, it’s the newer ones that pull ahead here.

Winner: Tie – Pixel 3a and Pixel 3

Price and availability

While the Pixel 2 is no longer available from Google itself, you can still pick it up from Amazon, with prices generally hovering around the $600 mark. It will work on most major U.S. networks. The Pixel 3 is currently available from a variety of retailers and carriers, including Sprint, U.S. Cellular, Verizon, and T-Mobile. While it’s not available from AT&T, it’ll still work on its networks. Prices for the Pixel 3 start from $800. The Pixel 3a is a different beast from any Pixel before, as it’s a midrange phone. It costs $400 — or half the price of the Pixel 3 — and it has the same availability as the Pixel 3.

Overall winner: Google Pixel 3

In these sorts of comparisons, it’s usually the newest device that wins the day, but due to the large gulf in relative price, it’s the Pixel 3 that comes out on top. That’s not all that surprising really since the Pixel 3 is Google’s flagship device, and while the Pixel 3a is newer, it’s aimed at a more budget-conscious audience and simply can’t match the Pixel 3’s power, luxurious design, and exceptionally strong camera.

But it’s closer than you think, and the Pixel 3a holds up extremely well against its more powerful and expensive cousins. The Snapdragon 670 chip is likely to surprise you with its capabilities, and its camera is close to being on par with the Pixel 3. Where the Pixel 3a falls down is on build materials, waterproofing, and a lack of Qi wireless charging. But it is $400 cheaper, and if you don’t mind making those sacrifices in the name of an exceptional camera, strong performance, and good battery life, then the Pixel 3a may win out for you here.

If money is no object, it should always be the Pixel 3. It’s a straight upgrade to the Pixel 2, and it outclasses the Pixel 3a. The Pixel 3 is an excellent phone and our worthy winner.

Mark Jansen
Mark Jansen is an avid follower of everything that beeps, bloops, or makes pretty lights. He has a degree in Ancient &…
Google I/O 2023 is happening on May 10 with an in-person event

It's that time of year once again. The days are getting longer, the gray skies of winter are slowly fading away, and it's almost time for another Google I/O. While it's a given that we have a new I/O each year, Google always puts on a little show when announcing the date for the next one. And now, we officially know when Google I/O 2023 will take place.

The opening keynote for this year's I/O is taking place at the Shoreline Amphitheater in Mountain View, California. In its email confirming the time and date, Google says, "Join a select audience to learn about Google’s latest innovations and developer solutions that help you work smarter and improve productivity." The opening keynote for I/O 2023 — where most of the big news and announcements are revealed — kicks off at 10 a.m. PT on May 10.

Read more
The Pixel 7’s best camera trick is coming to the iPhone and all Android phones
Erasing items in Magic Eraser.

The Google Pixel series of phones, specifically the Pixel 6 and Pixel 7, have an exclusive feature called Magic Eraser. With Magic Eraser, you can get rid of unwanted objects in a photo, such as people in the background or things like power lines. As of today, Magic Eraser is becoming available to all Android phones and iPhone users through Google One.

Magic Eraser debuted on the Pixel 6 lineup, which includes the Pixel 6, Pixel 6 Pro, and the more affordable Pixel 6a, which is still available to purchase (the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro have been discontinued). If you have a Pixel 7 or Pixel 7 Pro, you also have the Magic Eraser feature. One of the reasons I had always wanted a Pixel device is because of Magic Eraser, and it is something that I desperately wished Apple would implement.

Read more
This is the Pixel 2’s secret eye-scanning feature that never was
Google Pixel 2 XL - Best Android phones

Google's Pixel 2 was one of the best phones the company made, but it had the potential to be even cooler. The Internal Archive this weekend shared a prototype of an early Pixel 2 model that was equipped with iris-scanning technology. Google did not ultimately ship the Pixel 2 with an iris scanner, opting instead for its Pixel Imprint rear-mounted fingerprint sensor.

According to the Archive, the Pixel prototype here was a single-purpose one. It was dedicated nearly entirely to testing iris recognition. The front camera is gone, replaced by an infrared unit, and the rear camera lacks LEDs as well. Even the software loaded on the phone is an entirely basic version of Android with nothing but the bare necessities.

Read more