Skip to main content

HTC gets it: Cool accessories should work with every phone

htc under armour smartwatch news re camera
Being locked into an ecosystem is part and parcel of modern smartphone ownership. You dip a toe into Android or iPhone, and something beneath the surface grabs hold and won’t let go. Over time, it pulls you down into the depths, from where there’s no escape. Most of us have accepted this. We happily buy our apps from certain app stores, deal with incompatible chargers, and live with accessories that only work with a few products. It’s a fact of life, and finally a company agrees with us.

HTC’s new Re Camera, and the Zoe photo app, are compatible (or will be very soon) with not only Android phones made by other manufacturers, but Apple’s iPhone as well. Genius! HTC gets it.

Not locking the Re Camera down will help HTC

While the Re Camera could have been used to try and pull us into HTC’s world, thus potentially generating extra sales for the smartphone division, someone very sensible has realized there are a lot more sales to be had on the other side of the wall. When they’re due for a phone upgrade, maybe some of those buyers will consider an HTC phone. If not, well, at least a Re Camera sale was made, which is better than not selling anything. The decision not to attempt to lock us into an ecosystem could ensure HTC’s survival. At the moment, it doesn’t have an ecosystem. It builds hardware for Google’s Android ecosystem, and getting ideas above its station by trying to create one would be a bad idea.

The most damning evidence that cross platform compatibility works is that even Microsoft does it.

Instead of digging a moat, HTC has built a bridge.

Samsung loves its moat, but the bridge over it only goes one way, and it’s costing them sales. The Gear 2 smartwatch and the Gear Fit fitness tracker are only compatible with Samsung devices. Even the new Gear S smartwatch — which is a standalone phone as well — needs to be linked up with a Samsung phone to work in the first place.

These are accessories that will work with other company’s phones — there are workarounds to prove it — but Samsung doesn’t want it that way. A friend of mine recently went crazy over the look of the Gear S, and would have put an order in right there and then, were it not for having just purchased an LG G3. There’s not a chance this is a unique situation. Samsung thinks people will jump ship over to their products, but in reality, it just loses a sale because switching is often expensive, and always a pain.

Sony is just as bad. Its Lifelog app is fantastic, and a lot of fun when paired with the Smartband. Only recently has it made Lifelog open to other Android devices, yet it still hasn’t produced the app for iOS. Why? It doesn’t want to sell more Smartbands? Yes, there are associated development costs, but we’re talking about Sony, not Dave’s Budget Wearable Tech where the electricity only works on a Wednesday afternoon. HTC has an iOS app for Re Camera, and Zoe is coming for Apple’s operating system too, so there’s really no excuse.

A Re-birth for accessories

It’s not like HTC is the first to see how making an accessory compatible with more ecosystems could be beneficial. Competitive pricing isn’t the only reason people buy the Pebble smartwatch, it’s because it doesn’t matter if your phone runs Android or iOS, or whether you change your mind in a year’s time. It will keep working.

The most damning evidence that cross platform compatibility works is that even Microsoft does it. That massive, often clunking corporation ensures Office is available for almost every OS out there, it produces wireless keyboards that work with any tablet, and is even now writing apps for all major mobile platforms. It’s baffling why this is seen as forward thinking.

Imagine a world where you can buy a Moto 360 which works with your iPhone after downloading an app, just like Google has managed with Glass. Think about not having to check if Samsung’s next fitness band will work with your phone. If this concept seems rather alien, it’s called choice, and it’s sadly lacking in the mobile world.

HTC’s Re camera looks pretty nice, and if it’s a sales success, it may open other manufacturer’s eyes to the potential of producing more open accessories. That would be a Re-birth for the phone industry.

Topics
Andy Boxall
Senior Mobile Writer
Andy is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends, where he concentrates on mobile technology, a subject he has written about for…
HTC’s newest phone is a boring mid-ranger designed for the metaverse
HTC desire 22 pro in black

HTC has lifted the covers from the Desire 22 Pro, its latest smartphone that is equipped from top to bottom in metaverse functionalities (or so says HTC). HTC claims that the Desire 22 Pro can connect with its Vive Flow virtual reality glasses, allowing users to stream content from the phone’s screen to the wearable’s display. In doing so, users get to experience an expanded field of view equivalent to a 300-inch screen.

The latter is facilitated by a tech called HDCP, offering support for apps like Netflix, Hulu, and Disney+. However, it is unclear if the courtesy will be extended to graphics-intensive online games which consume a lot of network bandwidth, something that requires a fast wireless connection and a processor powerful enough to handle it. That seems unlikely for the HTC Desire 22 Pro, as the phone comes armed with Qualcomm’s mid-range Snapdragon 695 chipset.

Read more
Choosing my kid’s first phone came with serious consequences
A child sits criss cross on the floor using a smartphone.

As parents, we’re all charged with the awesome responsibility of guiding and directing our younglings on the right path to becoming well-rounded adults and productive members of society. Making sure they eat a balanced diet, sending them to the right schools, and engaging them in extra-curricular activities that promote a healthy body and mind are critically important.

When my daughter was born nearly 13 years ago, I never thought that choosing her technology platform would become one of those potentially life-altering decisions.
A different time for phones
During those halcyon days 13 years ago, the smartphone platforms we know today were in the same sort of infancy as my newborn daughter. The first snapshots from minutes after her birth were taken on a shiny new iPhone 3GS. That was nearly a year before the software was even called “iOS” and only a year after Apple had unveiled the App Store.

Read more
Every phone company wants a walled garden as nice as Apple’s
Boxes for an Apple Watch, iPhones, and Airpods sit on a desk.

At its annual developer conference, WWDC 2022, Apple will give us a preview of what the next versions of iOS, MacOS, watchOS, and tvOS bring to its enviably reliable ecosystem. However, to others, the same ecosystem is often likened to a walled garden, with attractive but carnivorous plants that make for a pleasing entry but an arduous and frustrating exit. But over those walls, some are peeking in with envious eyes.
How has Apple built such an impressively sticky ecosystem, and why do others want so desperately to replicate it?
Lured and locked in

Apple has long kept people closely tied to its ecosystem of products. Those who own one Apple product are often drawn to buy more. The harmony with which products work with each other is (primarily) what fuels this obsession. Even though Apple products are not flawless, the general notion is that they are great at what they are supposed to do -- and that perception contributes to Apple's success. Statista notes that Apple was the world's top-most technology company in terms of its market value in 2021.  
But it's not because of the devices alone that Apple's ecosystem thrives. Apple's operating systems and its suite of applications are intended to be exclusive to Apple devices -- a strategy it has always maintained, but especially since Steve Jobs's return to the company. But while this exclusivity grants Apple owners bragging rights in front of others, it also compels them to stay confined within the proverbial walls of its glamorous garden. 
Apple's methodology has always been to lock you into the ecosystem. In today's setting, escaping the hardware is easier but transitioning from a familiar software tool to another can cause headaches. Apple keeps its garden walls high, and by maintaining superior hardware quality and compelling people to purchase subscriptions to its services, scaling the walls becomes a herculean task. It's not always an overtly obvious lock-in either, it's the way many features "just work" together that's equally as effective.
For example, Apple devices feature Handoff, which allows multiple actions between devices, and AirDrop lets you quickly share documents and files between Apple devices, while tools such as Sidecar and Universal Control allow seamlessly integrated use of your Mac and iPad. Even Apple's iMessage locks people in by displaying messages sent from outside the Apple ecosystem in green, while those from Apple devices show up in blue. It has led to the system being called discriminatory towards non-Apple users.
Besides controlling individual apps, Apple rigorously controls how you install them. Apple inherently opposes sideloading apps on iPhone and iPad citing security concerns. 
Every company wants an ecosystem

Read more