Skip to main content

LG G2 vs. Galaxy Note 3: Which big phone is best for you?

lg g2 vs galaxy note 3 lg2banner
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Smartphone screens continue to grow and threaten to bust the seams of  your pants pockets. Two of the newest entrants into the phablet market, the LG G2 and the Samsung Galaxy Note 3, have the size to steal your attention. But do they have the specs that prove bigger is better? We take a look under the hood of these devices and see if the internals are impressive of the display with a spec showdown.

 

Galaxy Note 3  

GalaxyNote3
Image used with permission by copyright holder

LG G2 

LGG2
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Size 151.2 x 79.2 x 8.3 (mm) 138.5 x 70.9 x 8.9 (mm)
Weight 168g 143g
Screen 5.7 inch 1080p AMOLED 5.2-inch 1080p LCD
Resolution 1080×1920 pixels 1080×1920 pixels
OS Android 4.3 with TouchWiz UI Android 4.2.2 with 
Storage 32GB 32GB
SD Card Slot Yes No
Processor Quad-core Snapdragon 800 Quad-core Snapdragon 800 
RAM 3GB 2GB
Connectivity Wi-Fi, 4G LTE, HSPA+, NFC Wi-Fi, 4G LTE, HSPA+, NFC
Camera Front 2MP, Rear 13MP Front 2.1MP, Rear 13MP
Bluetooth Yes, version 4.0 Yes, version 4.0
Battery 3200mAh 3000mAh
Batt. Removable? Yes No
Quadrant Score 20,200 17,700
Charger Micro USB Micro USB
Marketplace Google Play Store Google Play Store
Ave. Price $300 (with 2-year contract) $200 (with 2-year contract)
Availability AT&T, Sprint, T-Mob, Verizon AT&T, Sprint, T-Mob, Verizon
DT Review Score 4 out of 5 4.5 out of 5
Recommended Videos

Not only do the Galaxy Note 3 and LG G2 have big screens, they’re the two fastest phones on the market in Oct. 2013. On the inside, they are very similar. Both are powered by the quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 processor, though the LG G2 accompanies it with 2GB while the Galaxy Note 3 bumps it up to 3GB. They also have extremely similar cameras, both front and back, though LG’s camera does have a 9-point focus. The Note 3 also has a slightly larger battery (but a biggest screen to light). That’s kind of the theme of this showdown: Samsung’s device has a slight edge in most categories, including it’s larger display, but LG beats Samsung on price and holdability. While we consider the Note 3 to be a ‘phablet’ or practically a tablet due to its large size, LG manages to pack a 5.2-inch screen into a smaller form factor than you’d think, thanks to some thin bezels. The G2 also has an advantage in pixels per inch, at 424 to the Note 3’s 386.

Feature face off:

  • Note 3 has the S Pen: Like previous Note phones, the S Pen is a big reason why you’d want this phone. There is no other stylus on the market that can match Samsung’s integrated S Pen in accuracy or integration. There are a number of built-in apps that use the S Pen, and Samsung has built a new radial menu that pops up every time you tap the pen to the screen, letting you more easily perform a number of functions. The Note 3 is also compatible with the $300 Galaxy Gear watch. If you want the Gear (and we’re not sure why you would), then you need a Note 3. 
  • G2 is built for one hand: Though it’s a big phone, LG has gone out of its way to make holding the G2 a more enjoyable experience than anything of its size. The power and volume buttons are now stacked in the middle-rear of the phone, right under the camera. This sounds odd, and is at first, but soon you realize its benefits. You can more easily hold the G2 without adjusting your grip and if you want to press volume when it’s in your pocket (or any time), you always know precisely which button you’re pressing. Accompanying this new feature is LG’s smart screen, which will turn on and off if you double tap your finger on the glass – no buttons required.

It’ll be up to you to decide if the differences warrant the extra $100, but we think the difference comes down to the stylus, and how you want to use your phone. If you want to be able to easily hold your phone in one hand, but still have a large screen, then we suggest the LG G2. If that S Pen excites you, you’re artistic, or you plan on holding your phone more like a tablet most of the time anyway, the Galaxy Note 3 is for you. Both devices are available on all four major carriers in the US, so getting your hands on each should be easy.

AJ Dellinger
AJ Dellinger is a freelance reporter from Madison, Wisconsin with an affinity for all things tech. He has been published by…
Your $1,000 flagship may not have faster 5G speeds than a budget phone
Moto Edge 20 Lite, OnePlus Nord 2, Oppo Find X3 Lite, and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3.

After spending over $1,000 on a flagship 5G phone, you might think you're getting the fastest network speeds possible. After all, isn't that what you're paying for? But our recent network testing shows that may very well not be the case, with 5G performance on flagship phones being minimally better than budget phones, and in some cases, actually worse.

To give you some context, earlier this year, we put the 5G-capable MediaTek Dimensity 700 against the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 in a test to see which processor delivered the best 5G performance and had the best daily user experience. Six months on, we’re going to take a look at four new 5G phones with different chips to see how they compare to answer this question: Does paying more for a smartphone with a flagship processor inside give you the fastest network connection, or is it all pumped-up marketing?
Understanding 5G
Before going into the details, we received some very interesting feedback from MediaTek after our last test, which is also relevant to this one. MediaTek contacted Digital Trends to discuss the 5G speed test results, as the Dimensity 700-powered Realme 8 5G couldn’t match the Oppo A54 5G with a Qualcomm chip inside. The company then took its own test equipment to the area where I had tested the phones, and in conversations afterwards, it gave plenty of insight into how 5G varies across phones, networks, and location.

Read more
iPhone 13 Pro Max vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3
iPhone 13 Pro Max back.

If you want an Apple smartphone, the iPhone 13 Pro Max is pretty much where it's at right now. Flaunting newly improved camera lenses, a beautiful 120Hz refresh rate, a more long-lasting battery, the new A15 Bionic chip, and the choice of having a massive 1TB in storage, it gets nearly everything right. However, while it may be the best -- and most deluxe -- Apple smartphone available at the moment, Samsung fans may probably argue that it's not the best phone overall when other manufacturers and operating systems are taken into account.

In particular, one of the best Samsung devices out now is the Galaxy Z Fold 3. As the third-generation Samsung foldable, it almost perfects the concept of a folding phone, incorporating a more durable hinge mechanism and better durability while also offering great performance, a big potential for multitasking, and some very solid cameras.

Read more
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3: Which reigns as king?
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 rests on a staircase railing because: right angles.

Microsoft released a series of new portable powerhouse products at its Surface event, including the next generation of their mobile line, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2. This is the successor to the much-criticized Surface Duo, which received negative reviews and lackluster sales due to issues with subpar hardware and software. With the Duo 2, Microsoft has taken criticism to heart and revamped it with flagship-level hardware and promises of an improved software experience.

The Duo 2 now joins other foldable phones like the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, which is widely considered to be one of the best on the market in terms of performance and features, and the compact, consumer-friendly Galaxy Z Flip 3. The specs between the Duo 2 and Fold 3 are similar in most regards, but there are some key differences, and Samsung has generally had more experience when it comes to folding-phone hardware. There's also a price disparity, with the Galaxy Z Fold 3 costing an extra $300 over the Duo 2. Read on to see our breakdown of how they differ and which one is better.
Specs

Read more