Skip to main content

MPAA says Google Glass is not a ‘significant threat,’ but helps detain a man for wearing it

mpaa says google glass not significant threat ice
Image used with permission by copyright holder

We were beginning to think we’d heard all the crazy Google Glass stories there were, but things just escalated quickly. Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents escorted out, then detained a man at an AMC movie theater in Columbus, Ohio because he wore Google Glass during a showing of Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit. The Gadgeteer originally reported the story, which is getting nuttier by the moment. Digital Trends has learned that the MPAA was already onsite at the movie theater and “referred the situation to the DHS.” Despite telling us they don’t see Google Glass as a “significant threat,” the MPAA assisted in detaining the wearer.

Updated by Jeffrey Van Camp at 3:50pm PT: The MPAA has requested that we alter the headline of this article to avoid implying that MPAA representatives detained the Glass wearer. But it did tell us that the “MPAA referred the situation to DHS,” or Department of Homeland Security.

Recommended Videos

The patron, who identifies himself as TU, was heading for a Saturday evening flick at the theater with his wife while wearing his Glass, which had special prescription lenses installed into them; without Glass, he could not see well. In a lengthy story published on The Gadgeteer, he described the incident, saying he was embarrassingly pulled out of the theater: “What followed was over an hour of the ‘feds’ telling me I am not under arrest, and that this is a ‘voluntary interview,’ but if I choose not to cooperate bad things may happen to me.”

TU claims he visited the theater several times before, talking to the concession stand and ticket collector about Google Glass, and showing it to them in a friendly way. This time though, a badge was shoved in his face by a federal agent, his Glass torn from his face, and was told to go outside immediately. TU notes his Glass was already off to prevent it from distracting him, but he wore it during the movie because it has his prescription lenses.

The MPAA may be running a some kind of movie security force.

After being taken from the theater, detained for three and a half hours, and questioned about his involvement in a movie-recording ring that the ICE agents were sure he was a part of, they looked inside his Glass and found (guess what!) nothing. After the whole ordeal, T.U. and his wife were released. 

But the story doesn’t end here. Before they left, a man by the name of “Bob Hope” from the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) came to apologize and give TU and his wife two free movie passes for all the trouble. What’s interesting is that the MPAA was at that theater to keep an eye on possible illegal recording of movies. Some stories claim that the MPAA works with theaters to enforce and prevent these illegal recordings, much like some kind of movie security force.

When we reached out to the MPAA, this is the statement we were given:

“Google Glass is an incredible innovation in the mobile sphere, and we have seen no proof that it is currently a significant threat that could result in content theft. The MPAA works closely with theaters all over the country to curb camcording and theater-originated piracy, and in this particular case, no such activity was discovered.”

However, this statement contrasts with just about everything TU says took place. There was no communication between him and AMC, the MPAA, or the ICE agents before they detained him; the Glass was off since TU went into the movie theater; and now the MPAA says Google Glass is a great piece of technology and that they see no problem with it. Yet, despite this statement, the story TU tells makes it sound like the ICE agents and the MPAA made him out to be public enemy number one.

“They wanted to know who I am, where I live, where I work, how much I’m making, how many computers I have at home, why am I recording the movie, who am I going to give the recording to, why don’t I just give up the guy up the chain, ’cause they are not interested in me. Over and over and over again.”

When we asked for clarification, the MPAA told us that they “currently [have] seen no proof Google Glass is a threat to perpetuate content theft.” That said, this whole story still doesn’t add up. We’re not sure why the MPAA felt the need to monitor the theater and call authorities to detain people in the first place.

Joshua Sherman
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Joshua Sherman is a contributor for Digital Trends who writes about all things mobile from Apple to Zynga. Josh pulls his…
Everything you need to know about the OnePlus 13
Official OnePlus 13 product renders showing rear panel colors.

OnePlus is an excellent brand that offers powerful flagship phones at a great value compared to some of its competitors. We followed every rumor about the OnePlus 13 for months, but now it's here — and it's everything we hoped for. It might not be available in the Western market yet, but it will be soon.

So, what makes the OnePlus 13 so special? Here's everything you need to know about OnePlus' latest flagship.
When is the OnePlus 13 being released?

Read more
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400: the race is on
Comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and MediaTek Dimensity 9400 processors.

The flagship mobile silicon race has entered its next phase, one that will dictate the trajectory of Android hardware heading into 2025. Merely weeks after MediaTek wowed us with the Dimensity 9400 system on a chip (SoC), Qualcomm also pulled a surprise with the reveal of the Snapdragon 8 Elite.

But this time around, the battle is not as straightforward. Where MediaTek is working closely with Arm and adopting its latest CPU and graphics innovations, Qualcomm has firmly put its faith in custom cores. These are no ordinary cores, but a next-gen iteration of the same fundamental tech stack that powers Windows on ARM laptops.

Read more
Discolored line on your new Kindle? You aren’t alone
Amazon Kindle Colorsoft Signature Edition on a table.

The new Kindle Colorsoft Signature Edition is the first full-color e-reader, and a lot of bookworms couldn't wait to get their hands on it. Sadly, many people are reporting the display has a discolored yellow area at the bottom of the screen. The problem is so widespread that the Kindle Colorsoft dropped to an average review rating of 2.6 out of 5, although it does remain the bestselling e-book reader at the moment.

The cause of the discoloration isn't clear. Some users report that it only happens when using the edge lighting feature on the Kindle, while others say it appeared after a software update. Either way, the yellowing is a problem, especially on a device that Amazon has marketed as being great for comics and graphic novel fans. It's hard to enjoy the colorwork in a comic when it's distorted.

Read more