Skip to main content

Pantech Matrix Review

Pantech Matrix
“The Matrix's $80 price tag makes it hard to knock this phone for what it is.”
Pros
  • Affordable; QWERTY keyboard; good reception; good battery life; nice camera
Cons
  • Very thick; tiny buttons; low-res display; slow web browser

Summary

While QWERTY keyboards usually crop up on true-blue smartphones that also carry buckets of other extraneous features aboard, AT&T has recently tried to push full keyboards to the lower-end of the segment with an array of three new QWERTY handsets under $100. The Pantech Matrix, priced at $80, matches the likes of a real smartphone with a QWERTY keyboard and3G Internet access, but keeps the rest of the feature load light. Unfortunately, if you’re looking to take full advantage its speedy 3G Internet access, that feature set ends up being a little too light.

Pantech MatrixFeatures and Design

Like Pantech’s earlier Duo, the Matrix gets two slide-out sections: a QWERTY keyboard that pops out the side and a number pad that slips out from the bottom. While this makes dialing easier, it also adds quite a bit of heft to the phone, thickening it to .78 inches deep. Other dimensions are fairly standard: an easily pocketable four inches tall and two wide.

Besides its dual keyboards, Pantech advertises the phone’s stereo Bluetooth profiles, 1.3-megapixel camera, video recording, and media player. AT&T also includes a handful of carrier extras, such as its Navigator service, Mobile Music, and MEdia Net.

Use and Testing

One of the first things we noticed about the Matrix after firing it up was its subpar display quality. Pantech must have scored a great deal on these screens from a surplus shipment left over from 2002, because that’s exactly what they look like. The lack of color range produced choppy gradients, the low resolution made text look choppy and graphics look pixilated, and there was a subtle “screen door effect,” in which the tiny grid between pixels is visible. Superior brightness helps mask some of these flaws, but in general, it’s not a pretty or refined-look display.

Like the Matrix’s primitive screen, the operating system on the phone hearkens to an earlier time. From the crudely animated icons for different options to the generic bleeps it bleats out as you scroll through them, the interface felt familiar, but a bit crusty around the edges, too. Seasoned cell phone users should have no problem adapting to its D-pad navigation and list-based menus, but anyone looking for any hint of a smartphone should move on.

More specifically, the Matrix’s Web browser is stuck in a time when checking the weather and getting stock quotes from a phone was still considering cutting edge stuff. Yes, the Matrix has a broadband 3G connection and the technical capability to open ordinary HTML pages like a real browser, but the time spent getting there with its clunky browser and slow processor will put you asleep. After plugging in DigitalTrends.com, for instance, it took 40 seconds to even load enough of the front page to display parts of it on screen, and another 30 seconds before it had actually finished loading everything. And of course, even after getting there, you’ll still have to navigate an unscaled HTML page in a miniscule box using a D-pad. AT&T’s network may be up to the task of feeding this phone a five-course meal of data, but you’ll still feel like Grandpa without his dentures trying to actually consume it all with such an antiquated browser.

Consuming preformatted video and other content from AT&T’s MEdia Net fares a little better, but even then, the small screen size makes reading text a very slow, clicky affair, and watching video a novelty at best. AT&T’s mobile e-mail client also measured up short, with no support for sending pictures from the camera as attachments, and more glaringly, no support for Gmail.

As a phone, the Matrix does what it needs to do, and does it fairly well. The slider for the key pad feels sturdy and smooth, dialing is easy even if the keys don’t have much feel to them, and sound quality is average. Reception and battery life were both highlights: our Matrix seemed to hang onto 3G coverage and get strong signal no matter where we went, and after burying it in a storage closet for a week, after usage, we were amazed when it still came out with battery life. Pantech’s estimate of three hours of talk time and 10 days of standby seems realistic.

Pantech MatrixCamera

For its relatively modest 1.3-megapixel resolution, the camera on the Matrix performs quite well in a variety of conditions. Our photos had a bit of the requisite digital noise in darker shots, but we liked how accurately the camera seemed to capture color. We credit the easily navigable options menu for the camera, which is far more robust than what you might find on others in the same price range. It allows you to adjust for different lighting conditions, compensate for brightness, choose different effects (such as sepia tone) and even set a timer for self shots. You won’t find quite enough options to confuse a first-time user, but you’ll find enough to make the best of your shots with manual tweaking, which struck us as an ideal middle ground.

Keyboard

Though the Matrix’s slide-out QWERTY keyboard does distinguish it from similar-priced phones that offer only numeric keypads, it ranks very low as far as QWERTY boards go. The two halves of the phone only slide apart about an inch, compressing the actual keys into a space only about three quarters of an inch tall. Those little keys mean you’ll mainly be typing with your fingernails to get precise key presses, compared to phones like the T-Mobile Sidekick or G1 that actually offer generous enough keyboard to accommodate the full fingertip. The hard, gel-coat keys fell short on tactile feedback, too. It’s certainly a better solution for texting than a traditional number pad, but don’t expect to want to tap out much more than short messages.

The main buttons on the face of the phone fair no better, getting clustered unnecessary close together at the bottom of the phone and demanding fingernail operation. We might understand if the length of the phone demanded tiny controls, or a giant screen sopped up all the extra space, but Pantech wasted at least half an inch of the phone’s length making room for Pantech and AT&T logos. Apply that space to a larger set of controls, and you turn a bathroom into a living room, in terms of comfort.

Conclusion

The Matrix’s $80 price tag makes it hard to knock this phone for what it is. For heavy text messagers choosing between a standard phone with a numeric keypad and the Matrix, its QWERTY keyboard, though not perfect, is still a major plus. And the phone is certainly competent for voice, too. But the dubious implementation of its 3G data capabilities makes us caution potential buyers against getting roped into a MEdia Net data plan that looks a lot more useful on paper than on the Matrix’s limited hardware. Before buying, make sure to investigate AT&T’s other affordable QWERTY phones, like the Slate, Quickfire, and Propel.

Pros:

• Price
• QWERTY keyboard
• Reception
• Battery life
• Camera

Cons:

• Thickness
• Tiny controls
• Low-res display
• Slow browser

Nick Mokey
As Digital Trends’ Editor in Chief, Nick Mokey oversees an editorial team covering every gadget under the sun, along with…
All the new tech that blew our reviewers away this month
A glowing blue and purple on the LG C2 OLED.

We're nearing developer conference season, but before we get there, we've been busy reviewing our little hearts out this past month.

We've found the gems among the many tech products we've given a try this month. They span all the most important established product categories, but also include those tech products that are more off the beaten path. Everything below is stuff we've personally used and reviewed ourselves -- and these ones certainly got our attention this month.

Read more
Motorola G Stylus 5G hands-on review: Notetaking nirvana on a budget
The Motorola G Stylus 5G with a stylus and plants.

My first thought upon seeing the Moto G Stylus 5G was how much it reminded me of the Motorola Edge+, which I recently reviewed. Fresh out of the box, the two are nearly identical in appearance. However, the G Stylus has some extra tricks up its sleeve, one of which is the fact that it has a built-in stylus that invites comparisons to Samsung’s S22 Ultra. The other is a very affordable price tag. The question is, can such a low-cost smartphone offer an experience that compares to such flagship devices?
Design and display: Looks great, feels cheap
As mentioned, the G Stylus looks an awful lot like the Edge+, and that’s a good thing. It’s a beautiful design that manages to negate some of the inconvenience of the camera bump. Unfortunately, the G Stylus doesn’t have that premium feel to it like the Edge+, and the backplate is a real fingerprint magnet. However, if you’re like me, a phone comes out of the box and goes immediately into a protective case, so lower quality backplate materials are a good place to reduce production costs.

The tall, 6.8-inch screen looks great, its FHD+ resolution is good enough, and colors/contrast are fine by my eye. Best of all is its 120Hz refresh rate, which allows for fluid navigation. Touchscreen functionality is responsive, and haptic feedback is similarly decent. Bezels are fairly large and noticeable, but not offensively so.

Read more
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G hands-on review: Your long-term partner
Rear view of the blue Samsung Galaxy A53 5G.

Samsung has overhauled its great value midrange A-Series devices, launching the new Galaxy A33 5G and Galaxy A53 5G. At first glance, both look identical to each other, and arguably no different from the Galaxy A52 5G’s lovely design, but there’s a serious focus on longevity here with various changes to the spec that makes the new lower price even more tempting. I had the chance to try both phones out a few days before the launch.
Galaxy in your hand
The dimensions of the Galaxy A33 5G and Galaxy A53 5G are almost identical, and both are available in the same four colors, making the only immediately obvious way to tell the difference between them on their fronts. The Galaxy A33 5G has a teardrop selfie camera cutout, which Samsung calls Infinity-U, while the Galaxy A53 5G has a circular hole-punch selfie cam, called Infinity-O. There is a slight difference in weight, but as it’s only a few grams you won’t really notice.

The textured rear panel provides plenty of in-hand grip and has a pleasing warmth to it. The camera module blends into it for a smooth, classy finish. There are four colors, a pair of ordinary black or white models, along with a pretty sky blue and an unusual peach finish. I liked the sky blue a lot and was pleased the peach-ish version didn’t stray too far into the overdone pink territory. They give the design a fun, modern twist.

Read more