Skip to main content

Battle of the Samsung Watches: Gear Live vs. Gear Fit vs. Gear 2

samsung gear live vs fit 2 spec showdown headder

Google announced Samsung’s newest addition to the world of wearables at their I/O conference. Samsung’s newest smartwatch is the Gear Live and it’s available for pre-order now on Google Play.

The Gear Live will debut Android Wear OS, which means it’ll receive notifications like texts and calls, and can be paired with any Android device running on Android 4.3 or higher.  The Gear Live has a clear emphasis on compatibility, and the I/O event showcased the smartwatch interacting with several different Android devices. It’s available for pre-order now on the Google Play marketplace and will go on sale July 7. 

Here’s our spec showdown between Samsung’s Gear Live, Gear 2 and the fitness-oriented, Gear Fit. The obvious difference is that Gear Live touts the Android Wear OS. Below is a breakdown of the specs from all three watches. See how the Samsung Galaxy Gear stands up to the Sony Smartwatch 2 here

 

Gear Live

Samsung Gear Live Front Black

Gear Fit

samsung-galaxy-gear-fit-press

Gear 2

Samsung-Galaxy-Gear-2-mocha-grey-2
Size 37.9 x 56.4 x 8.9 (mm) 23.4 x 57.4 x 11.95 (mm) 36.9 x 58.4x 10.0 (mm)
Weight 59g 27g 68g
Screen 1.63” Super AMOLED  1.84” Curved Super AMOLED  1.63” Super AMOLED
Resolution 320 x 320 pixels 432 x 128 pixels  320 x 320 pixels 
OS Android Wear Android Tizen
Storage 4GB N/A 4GB
Processor 1.2GHz processor 180MHz ARM Cortex-M4 processor 1.0 GHz Dual Core Processor
RAM 512MB N/A  512MB
Bluetooth Version 4.0 LE Version 4.0 LE Version 4.0 LE, IrLED
Battery About 2-3 days (300mAh) About 3-4 days About 2-3 days (300mAh)
Charger N/A Magnetic charger Magnetic charger
Price (Ave.) $200 $200 $300
Availability Google Play, Samsung Samsung  Samsung

Design

Samsung’s Gear Live and Gear 2 have similar touchscreens and resolution. All three watches are water-resistant. All include fitness features including heart rate monitor, compass, gyroscope, and accelerometer. The battery life is longest on the Gear Fit, but the 2-3 day battery life of the Gear 2 and Gear Live is manageable. The Live’s 22mm strap is offered in two colors: black and red wine.

Features

Gear Live offers what Google calls the “context stream,” a vertical list of cards that appear on the watch face one at a time and display specific notifications you might want to see, like weather, texts, emails, directions, or other actions. It’s streamlined from what Android phones offer, but far more robust than the the operating systems of Gear Fit and Gear 2. What’s more, Live’s voice recognition capabilities can take commands to check data and appointments, make calls, or even set an alarm with voice activation. The smartwatch can pair with Google Chromecast or play music on your phone.

Operating System

The Android Wear operating system offers a slew of features that aren’t available for the Gear Fit or Gear 2. For starters, the Gear Live displays notifications from a wide variety of compatible apps, unlike the Gear Fit and Gear 2. Though it’s still new, do to the scale of Android, Wear will likely have a much larger ecosystem of apps for the Android Wear, unlike the Tizen OS for Gear 2. Meanwhile, Fit and Gear 2 only pair with a several Samsung phones.  

Conclusion

Gear Live looks to improve upon Samsung’s past efforts in just about every way. This is a smartwatch that will pair with any Android device (4.3 or higher) and comes equipped large ecosystem of apps. Our reviews of both Gear Fit and Gear 2 reveal each device’s lackluster features. In comparison, the Gear Live has nearly identical specs to the Gear 2 but has a smaller price tag and better OS. To be fair, the Gear Live doesn’t emphasize its fitness components. In the gym though, Gear Live seems to be a worthy competitor of the Gear Fit. By the looks of it,  Gear Live is the most advanced smartwatch from Samsung. What’s more, the $200 price tag renders the other Samsung smartwatch contenders obsolete.  

Joe Donovan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Joe Donovan is an editorial assistant for Digital Trends who covers a variety of general assignments throughout the…
Google, Apple, Samsung, and OnePlus camera test exposes poor performers
The Pixel 6, iPhone SE, Galaxy A53, and Nord 2T camera modules.

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G has five cameras on the back, the OnePlus Nord 2T has three, the Google Pixel 6 has two, and the Apple iPhone SE (2022) has just one camera. Surely, due to these differences, it would be a very unfair fight to compare them all?

That's precisely what we wanted to find out! Let's take a look and see if having multiple cameras on your phone really makes a difference to photo quality, or if those extra sensors are little more than fluff.
The phones and cameras
It may look like the phones in the test aren’t really competing with each other, but if you’ve got somewhere around $500 or 500 British pounds to spend, then these will likely all show up in your search. We’re not going to compare the hardware here, and are instead going to concentrate only on camera performance. To do that, we should first look at the camera specs on each phone before we get to the photos.

Read more
Google Pixel 6a vs. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
Google Pixel 6a

Which almost reasonably priced advanced smartphone will best suit your needs for years to come -- the Google Pixel 6a, first announced at the Google I/O 2022 event, or Apple's iPhone SE, the third incarnation of the compact budget handset, released in March? It's a squeaker.

Based on reviews of both smartphones, we compare key categories to determine a winning phone. Our judgment does not take into account an inherent preference for iOS or Android, or even a preference for a smaller phone, both of which are sure to heavily influence buyers.
Specs

Read more
Samsung Galaxy A53 vs. OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G in white and black.

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is possibly the best mid-range phone you'll see all year. Featuring a luscious 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, it looks stunning. Its performance isn't to be sniffed at either, with its five-nanometer Exynos 1280 chip, 6GB of RAM, quadruple-lens rear camera setup, and 5,000mAh battery.

Of course, in a world where overachieving mid-range phones are now becoming the norm, its bid for supremacy isn't unchallenged. If you're an Android fan, one of its biggest rivals is the OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G. This is another device that punches above its weight in performance, helped by an alluring 6.43-inch AMOLED display, a triple-lens camera, and 65W fast-charging. However, with the strengths of each phone residing in different areas, it's difficult to decide which is the better device for you.

Read more