Samsung Gear Live smartwatch, with Android Wear installed, set for Google Play launch

By Williams Pelegrin June 25, 2014

This story is part of our complete Google I/O coverage

During Google I/O, the company officially revealed Samsung’s Android Wear smartwatch, the Gear Live.

Initially revealed as a rumor back in April, Google showed off the Gear Live onstage after the company’s Android Wear demo. While no price was revealed for the Gear Live, Google said it will go on sale through Google Play “later today,” confirming a June 21 report that revealed the Gear Live will launch during Google I/O.

Recommended Videos

Sharing a similar design with Samsung’s Gear 2 smartwatch, which runs Tizen software, the Gear Live features a 1.63-inch Super AMOLED touchscreen with a 320 x 320 pixel resolution. A 1.2GHz processor powers the watch and 512MB of RAM is on hand to keep it running smoothly. The body meets IP67 water and dust resistance standards, and the 22mm strap can easily be changed to another of your choice. Samsung will offer straps in both black and red.

Fitting in with Samsung’s recent obsession with health and fitness, the Gear Live has a built-in heart rate monitor, along with other sensors such as a compass, gyroscope, and an accelerometer. Bluetooth 4.0 LE enables the watch to connect with your phone, and there’s a total of 4GB internal storage space.

It’s the Android Wear operating system which makes the Gear Live standout. It displays notifications from a wide variety of compatible apps, making it unnecessary to continually check your phone. Android Wear can be controlled by your voice, and commands can be given to check data and appointments, make calls, or even set an alarm.

The Gear Live will work with any Android device with version 4.3 or later installed, making a change from the restrictive nature of previous Gear watches, and although it will be making its debut inside the Google Play store, it’ll also be sold through Samsung’s own retail outlets in the future. It’s expected to cost $200 with pre-orders starting today, before shipping on July 7.

Topics

Williams Pelegrin

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…

Mobile

Google Pixel 7 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra: Who wins Android smartphone battle?

Someone holding a Google Pixel Pro 7 feat image.

Samsung and Google make some of the finest smartphones on the market, offering the most advanced features that make the most of their hardware and software integration. Both companies introduced new versions of their flagship phones this year, and our reviewers have put them to the test. Now it's time for the top-of-the-line Android smartphone smackdown: Which flagship phone -- the Google Pixel 7 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra -- is the best one to capture the contents of your wallet?
Specs

Google Pixel 7 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

Mobile

Google Pixel Watch vs. Samsung Galaxy Watch 5: which is the Wear OS champ?

Google Pixel Watch with two different strap styles.

Google has unveiled its highly-anticipated Pixel Watch, ushering in a new era for Wear OS devices and the company’s expanding Pixel ecosystem. It’s a fitting companion to the new Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro, which were also announced during this week’s Made by Google event, alongside a new Pixel Tablet.

While it’s encouraging to see more Wear OS smartwatches appearing, the real question is whether Google’s first smartwatch brings enough to the table to topple Samsung’s Galaxy Watch 5, a device that’s effectively become the gold standard of Wear OS devices. Read on as we compare their specs and features to answer that question.
Specs

Mobile

Google, Apple, Samsung, and OnePlus camera test exposes poor performers

The Pixel 6, iPhone SE, Galaxy A53, and Nord 2T camera modules.

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G has five cameras on the back, the OnePlus Nord 2T has three, the Google Pixel 6 has two, and the Apple iPhone SE (2022) has just one camera. Surely, due to these differences, it would be a very unfair fight to compare them all?

That's precisely what we wanted to find out! Let's take a look and see if having multiple cameras on your phone really makes a difference to photo quality, or if those extra sensors are little more than fluff.
The phones and cameras
It may look like the phones in the test aren’t really competing with each other, but if you’ve got somewhere around $500 or 500 British pounds to spend, then these will likely all show up in your search. We’re not going to compare the hardware here, and are instead going to concentrate only on camera performance. To do that, we should first look at the camera specs on each phone before we get to the photos.