Skip to main content

AT&T and Verizon lobbying for increased pricing power over smaller ISPs

Image used with permission by copyright holder

A lobbying group representing some of America’s largest telecom companies want the FCC to remove rules designed to ensure a fair price for access to telecommunication networks for smaller ISPs.

USTelecom, which AT&T, Verizon, CenturyLink, and other communications companies are a part of, is asking the FCC to invoke the rule of forbearance, and to remove what it sees as an archaic ruling that now hurts competition in the modern world. In a blog post entitled “Forbearance: It’s Not 1996 Anymore,” USTelecom CEO Jonathan Spalter argues that if the rules set in place by the 1996 Communication Act, are now outdated, then the FCC must “forbear” that ruling.

Recommended Videos

“The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is required by law to stop enforcing rules that once might have been necessary to ensure reasonable practices, or to protect consumers, but no longer serve that purpose. Once the FCC determines a rule isn’t necessary anymore, the Communications Act requires the FCC to forbear.”

The ruling in question states that some ILECs (incumbent local exchange carriers — local telephone carriers) are required to allow access to their infrastructure networks to competitors at prices set by a regulatory body. Spalter argues that the world is now an exceptionally different place from the one that existed in 1996, and that consumers would benefit from this forbearance, with savings of over $1 billion over the next ten years, as well as an increase in investment of $1.8 billion and the creation of over 6,000 jobs.

Sounds good? Those smaller ISPs obviously don’t think so. Since the prices set by regulators are generally quite low, that allows smaller ISPs to exist and hope to eventually outgrow the need for piggybacking on a competitor’s service. Without this ruling in place, some estimate that the major ISPs would be able to push up the prices charged to smaller ISPs by 15 percent — a charge that would probably cascade down to the consumer, and might force some households to switch service providers, possibly putting smaller providers out of business.

It may well be that USTelecom has noticed a trend in recent FCC thinking, and sees that this may be the best time to place this request. Back in December, the FCC voted to roll back net neutrality protections that would have meant access to the internet was treated as a utility, not a service, and stopped companies from impeding or blocking access to certain websites. Despite huge amounts of opposition, that rollback recently went official, and it remains to be seen what impact that repeal and this petition has on future access to the internet.

Mark Jansen
Mobile Evergreen Editor
Mark Jansen is an avid follower of everything that beeps, bloops, or makes pretty lights. He has a degree in Ancient &…
Verizon and AT&T propose 5G midband power limits to avoid aircraft interference
Aircraft among clouds descending for a landing.

Following concerns from the aviation industry, both Verizon and AT&T have agreed to temporarily lower the power of their new midband 5G towers to quell fears that the new spectrum could interfere with equipment on board commercial and military aircraft. 
When the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced plans last year to auction a new section of C-band spectrum, a number of commercial aviation groups raised concerns that these new 5G frequencies could cause catastrophic failures in avionics that could even lead to collisions. As a result, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and U.S. Department of Transportation jointly called on the FCC to pause the auction until the matter could be more thoroughly investigated. 

Despite this, the FCC forged ahead, disagreeing with studies that suggested that a concentration of 5G telecommunications in the new 3.7–3.98GHz C-band could bleed through into the 4.2–4.4GHz range used by aircraft equipment such as radar altimeters. The 0.2GHz buffer in-between the frequencies was more than sufficient to avoid interference, FCC officials said. 
Earlier this month, however, The Wall Street Journal reported that Verizon and AT&T agreed to delay their midband 5G rollouts into early 2022 at the request of FAA officials. Both carriers had planned to begin rolling out the new spectrum in early December, but voluntarily pushed the date back to January 5 in “the spirit of good faith,” as Verizon officials said. While the FCC and carriers still insist that the C-band rollout poses no risk to cockpit safety systems, they’ve agreed to work with the FAA to try to address its concerns, and now they’re proposing another compromise to further placate the aviation industry.
According to the WSJ, Verizon and AT&T have sent a joint letter to FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel, offering to dial back the power of their 5G cell towers for six months to give aviation safety researchers time to more carefully study the effects of the new spectrum on equipment such as radar altimeters. 
While an overall limit on midband 5G power would be applied nationwide, the companies also promised to lower the signal output even further near airports and helipads. In the letter to Rosenworcel, the companies added that they “remain confident that 5G poses no risk to air safety,” but they also want to be “sensitive to the Federal Aviation Administration’s desire for additional analysis of this issue.” 
An FCC spokesperson said that the agency has agreed with the limits, describing it as “one of the most comprehensive efforts in the world to safeguard aviation technologies,” and says it will work with the FAA to get the new 5G frequencies deployed “both safely and swiftly.” 
Both AT&T and Verizon remain on track to begin their new midband 5G deployments on January 5, 2022, and executives note that they don’t expect the temporary limits to have any serious effects on bandwidth during the initial rollouts. 

Read more
Everything you need to know about the OnePlus 13
Official OnePlus 13 product renders showing rear panel colors.

OnePlus is an excellent brand that offers powerful flagship phones at a great value compared to some of its competitors. We followed every rumor about the OnePlus 13 for months, but now it's here — and it's everything we hoped for. It might not be available in the Western market yet, but it will be soon.

So, what makes the OnePlus 13 so special? Here's everything you need to know about OnePlus' latest flagship.
When is the OnePlus 13 being released?

Read more
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. MediaTek Dimensity 9400: the race is on
Comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and MediaTek Dimensity 9400 processors.

The flagship mobile silicon race has entered its next phase, one that will dictate the trajectory of Android hardware heading into 2025. Merely weeks after MediaTek wowed us with the Dimensity 9400 system on a chip (SoC), Qualcomm also pulled a surprise with the reveal of the Snapdragon 8 Elite.

But this time around, the battle is not as straightforward. Where MediaTek is working closely with Arm and adopting its latest CPU and graphics innovations, Qualcomm has firmly put its faith in custom cores. These are no ordinary cores, but a next-gen iteration of the same fundamental tech stack that powers Windows on ARM laptops.

Read more