Skip to main content

Disney is starting its own streaming service, pulling content from Netflix

Disney says its own streaming service will be much cheaper than Netflix

Disney to launch new streaming service
They say competition is good for consumers; if so, the future is only looking brighter for cord cutters. The Walt Disney Company in early August announced it plans to pull its movies from Netflix and launch its own (less expensive) streaming service, which will be available in the U.S. in 2019.

‘We’re going to launch big’

Recommended Videos

Despite early reports that Netflix was working toward a deal to keep some Disney properties on the streaming service permanently, we now know that, come 2019, all Star Wars and Marvel movies will live exclusively on Disney’s platform.

“We’re going to launch big, and we’re going to launch hot,” Disney CEO Bob Iger said in September at the Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2017 Media, Communications & Entertainment Conference in Los Angeles. The service will be home to several new Disney series, three or four exclusive Disney movies, as well as all the Disney content that’s currently hosted elsewhere.

Iger laid out plans for the future, saying the next two years would be focused largely upon direct-to-consumer streaming products, and upon the transition to a new CEO (Iger will be leaving in 2019).

A lower price point 

While it’s true that a Disney-specific streaming service won’t have quite as much content as competitors, Iger noted that the plan is to make up for this difference in the subscription cost. During a November earnings call, the executive said that the new streaming service would be priced “substantially below where Netflix is.” The CEO noted, “That is in part reflective of the fact that it will have substantially less volume. It’ll have a lot of high quality because of the brands and the franchises that will be on it that we’ve talked about. But it’ll simply launch with less volume, and the price will reflect that.”

Disney taking control

A streaming service is a logical step for Disney, which last year purchased a 33 percent share in BAMTech, MLB Advanced Media’s streaming technology company. BAMTech’s previous projects include HBO Now and Major League Baseball’s streaming service. Disney also announced it is now buying an additional 42 percent stake in BAMTech for $1.58 billion.

In an earlier statement, Iger said: “The media landscape is increasingly defined by direct relationships between content creators and consumers, and our control of BAMTech’s full array of innovative technology will give us the power to forge those connections, along with the flexibility to quickly adapt to shifts in the market.”

The new platform won’t just host Disney classics. The company plans to make a “significant investment in an annual slate of original movies, TV shows,” and more.

Netflix currently produces a family of shows based on Marvel properties —  Daredevil, Jessica Jones, Luke Cage, and Iron Fist — so it will be interesting to see how close the two companies remain.

Iger also announced that Disney will be launching a new, stand-alone ESPN streaming service in 2018. This is huge news for cord cutters who have left cable behind but still yearn to watch sports. It is also big for ESPN, which has had a rough couple of years. The sports media empire has lost 12 million subscribers since its peak in 2011, and the company fired a number of high-profile employees in 2017, including NBA reporters Marc Stein and Chad Ford. Former ESPN writer Bill Simmons claimed that the company was too slow to recognize the importance of digital infrastructure.

According to Disney’s statement, the new ESPN service will offer “approximately 10,000 live regional, national, and international games and events a year, including Major League Baseball, National Hockey League, Major League Soccer, Grand Slam tennis, and college sports. Individual sport packages will also be available for purchase, including MLB.TV, NHL.TV and MLS Live.” There is no confirmation yet on pricing. Disney says “the new service will be accessed through an enhanced version of the current ESPN app.”

This is not the only important cord-cutting news of late. FX recently announced it is partnering with Comcast to deliver FX+, a $6 per month, ad-free streaming service that includes all of the network’s original series. However, that service will be linked to cable subscriptions. If Disney’s new plans let viewers say goodbye to cable while keeping ESPN’s multiple sports packages, it could be a serious blow to cable companies and the status quo at large.

Update: Disney CEO Bob Iger says the new service will be significantly cheaper than Netflix. 

Will Nicol
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Will Nicol is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends. He covers a variety of subjects, particularly emerging technologies, movies…
Disney+ with ads launches December 8; Hulu raises prices
The Disney Plus home screen.

The ad-supported version of Disney+ will launch in the United States on December 8, 2022, the company announced today along with its earnings for the third fiscal quarter. The monthly subscription fee will cost $8 — that's $3 cheaper than the "Premium" subscription, which runs $11 a month or $110 annually.

The ad-supported plan also will be available as part of the Disney Bundle, which gives subscribers access to Hulu and ESPN+. There's a new skinny Disney Bundle, however. Here's how that breaks down:

Read more
What is ESPN+: The live sports streamer explained
ESPN+ app on a movile device.

Over the past year, ESPN's business model has changed, both from a broadcast and digital perspective. Now "The Worldwide Leader in Sports" is putting a greater emphasis on its additional paid service, ESPN+. Not meant as a replacement for the cable channel, it's a subscription add-on to ESPN that is quickly becoming essential for the sports fan who doesn't have a cable subscription to access ESPN's content and coverage.

ESPN Plus also has grown to encompass ESPN Insider, ESPN.com's paid subscription that provided access to "Insider" content like special analysis, fantasy sports content, and more. Today, more and more content qualifies as "Insider" material, making ESPN+ a more essential service for sports fans, especially if you follow ESPN's top analysts like Zach Lowe and Bill Barnwell. Additionally, subscribers get exclusive access to certain sports coverage, events, shows, and more.

Read more
The problem with Disney and its queer-coded villains
Image of Maleficent, Ursula, and the Evil Queen.

Disney villains are an institution for the Mouse House. Far more interesting than the studio's heroes and often the most memorable part of its films, villains are as important to Disney's success as the princesses that built the company. Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs was the studio's first film, but the Evil Queen is far more enduring than the weak and nearly inconsequential girl at the center of the story. The Little Mermaid, the film that launched the Disney Renaissance and established the modern slate of princesses, features a precocious redhead as the protagonist, but it's the villain, the larger-than-life octopus/woman Ursula, that secured the film a place in the pantheon of animated classics.

Yes, villains are often one of the best parts -- if not the best -- of these stories. The best Disney films always have a great protagonist, but they often have an even greater villain. Their songs are the catchiest, their designs the most striking, and their behaviors instantly iconic. They are also, for the most part, queer-coded.

Read more