Skip to main content

Halloween Ends review: a franchise mercy kill

Well, that’s finally over.

Filmmaker David Gordon Green’s revival of the Halloween franchise, which started out strong with 2018’s Halloween before stumbling with 2021’s Halloween Kills, wraps up with this year’s appropriately titled Halloween Ends, a film intended to be the swan song for both his trilogy and original Halloween star Jamie Lee Curtis’ involvement with the franchise. And while Green’s final installment manages to salvage some of the series’ appeal, Halloween Ends ultimately falls short of realizing the trilogy’s initial potential.

Michael Myers stares at the camera from the hallway of a house in a scene from Halloween Ends.

Ending the story

Directed by Green from a script he co-wrote with Danny McBride, Paul Brad Logan, and Chris Bernier, Halloween Ends picks up several years after the events of Halloween Kills, as Laurie Strode (Curtis) attempts to move past the tragic events of the prior two films. She lives with her orphaned granddaughter, Allyson (Andi Matichak), in the same town where serial killer Michael Myers (played by James Jude Courtney and Nick Castle) went on his murder sprees — a town still grappling with paranoia and fear after Michael’s disappearance at the end of Halloween Kills.

The film casts Rohan Campbell (The Hardy Boys) as Corey, a babysitter whose involvement in a tragic accident years earlier has led to him becoming a local pariah and the focus of the town’s unresolved rage. When Corey finds his path crossing with that of both the Strode family and Michael Myers, it sets off a chain of events in motion that brings the Boogeyman back to Haddonfield.

It also makes for a somewhat clumsy, heavy-handed exploration of grief and the quest for closure, as well as the transitive nature of anger, set against a gruesome tapestry of murder.

Jamie Leee Curtis walks away from Rohan Campbell in a park in a scene from Halloween Ends.

Killer confusion

Where Green’s original Halloween did a fantastic job of channeling the creeping unease of John Carpenter’s original slasher film, relying more heavily on the atmosphere and a sense of tension than spectacles of gore, its follow-up reversed course, delivering a parade of over-the-top kills (in keeping with its title, perhaps) that grew increasingly ridiculous as the film progressed. Halloween Ends carves out a place for itself in the middle ground, offering a more balanced mix of subtle scares and messy ultraviolence.

That might seem like an improvement, but the film instead feels frustratingly indecisive as it tries — unsuccessfully — to marry these two types of slasher cinema. The sense of gradually increasing tension that the 2018 film (and Carpenter’s original film before it) nurtured so well is lost in Halloween Ends as the film’s tone pinballs back and forth between creeping terror and explosions of blood and viscera, with the latter never giving the former the opportunity to be properly seeded.

Whether this conflict is a product of wanting to please a divided fan base or an effort to cram too many ideas into a single story, Halloween Ends never feels settled in the type of experience it wants to give its audience and feels like two distinctly different visions that are repeatedly smashed together until they become a singular, messy pulp of a movie.

This type of confusion carries through to the film’s release, which has Halloween Ends premiering in theaters and on Peacock streaming service simultaneously, but its filmmakers insisting that it shouldn’t be reviewed outside theaters.

Michael Myers tries to stab Jamie Lee Curtis' character in a scene from HAlloween Ends.

Final girl forever

Halloween Ends doesn’t entirely lose its way, however, thanks to some fine performances by Curtis and Campbell.

In her big farewell (we’re told) to the role, Curtis continues to remind us why Laurie Strode is still one of the greatest “final girl” characters of all time. After delivering a wonderfully tough return to the role in 2018’s Halloween, then going off the rails (in a fun way) in Halloween Kills, she manages to find a much more nuanced happy medium in Halloween Ends that feels like the glue holding the rest of the film together. She’s the most fascinating element of every scene she’s in — even the ones she shares with Michael Myers — and if it is indeed her final Halloween film, any future installments will be hard-pressed to fill the role (literally and figuratively) she plays in the series.

As Corey, the undeserving focus of Haddonfield’s rage, Campbell also gives a good performance as someone struggling with the dark path they’ve been set on, and who can’t seem to diverge from it no matter how hard they try. Campbell’s portrayal of Corey effectively engenders the sympathy the film wants you to feel for him, and when his character’s arc pivots, it’s his performance that makes that shift feel earned and supported by everything we’ve seen so far.

Michael Myers stands in a tunnel with a knife in a scene from Halloween Ends.

A disappointing denouement

While it seems silly to even consider that Halloween Ends will actually be the final installment of the franchise, which has seen multiple reboots, spinoffs, and retroactive adjustments to its fictional timeline across 13 films and more than four decades, it is a bit disappointing to know it will be the final chapter in a trilogy that began with so much promise.

Few films can generate the level of creeping dread that Carpenter painstakingly crafted in Halloween, but Green came closer than anyone else has — and many have tried — in his 2018 revival, which managed to serve as a narrative and spiritual sequel to the 1978 film. Green’s Halloween suggested that he understood what made the original film such a terrifying touchstone for generations of movie audiences, only to have his 2021 sequel go down the same, campy path as many of the franchise’s most forgettable sequels.

Halloween Ends delivers another closing chapter in the story of Michael Myers, but the film ultimately leaves the franchise in only a slightly better place than previous “final” installments. Given how much potential we saw in 2018 and the uniformity of the trilogy’s creative team across all three films, it’s difficult not to be disappointed with the inability of Halloween Ends to stick the landing and bring things to a more satisfying close.

Franchise fans can take heart, though. Even if we’ve seen the end of this version of Michael Myers — and Laurie Strode, for that matter — there’s always another Halloween coming. Maybe the next one will be even better.

Directed by David Gordon Green, Halloween Ends is in theaters now and streaming on Peacock.

Halloween Ends (2022)

Halloween Ends
111m
Genre
Horror, Thriller
Stars
Jamie Lee Curtis, Andi Matichak, Will Patton
Directed by
David Gordon Green
Watch on Peacock

Editors' Recommendations

Movie images and data from:
Rick Marshall
A veteran journalist with more than two decades of experience covering local and national news, arts and entertainment, and…
Peacock kicks off October with Halloween Horror collection
Logo for Peacock's Halloween Horror collection.

The calendar is about to turn to October, which means we've officially entered the spooky season. If you're looking for something frightening to watch, Peacock will supply the scares with its new Halloween Horror collection.

Starting today, Peacock is the home to the ultimate collection of Halloween movies and series. The highlight of the month belongs to Michael Myers as he makes his return in Halloween Ends. the last film in the H40 trilogy finds Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) has been living with her granddaughter for the past four years. Michael hasn't been seen since the events in Halloween Kills. When a teenage boy is accused of killing a young boy, Laurie immediately speculates that Michael is behind it, so she prepares for one final showdown with the masked figure. Halloween Ends will be in theaters and available to stream on Peacock on October 14.

Read more
Smile review: A cruelly scary studio horror movie
Caitlin Stasey smiles, unnervingly.

The alarm has been tripped. The backdoor is wide open. And who or whatever’s impersonating the security-system operator on the other end of the phone line has just croaked three words that no horror movie character would ever want to hear: “Look behind you.” The command puts Rose (Sosie Bacon), the increasingly petrified heroine of Smile, between a rock and a hard place. She has to look, even if every fiber of her being would rather not. And so does the audience. We’re locked into her campfire crucible, forced to follow the hesitant backward tilt of her gaze, and the anticipatory creep of a camera that’s slow to reveal what that disembodied voice has invited her (and us) to discover.

Smile is full of moments like this. It’s a nasty, diabolically calibrated multiplex scream machine — the kind of movie that sends ripples of nervous laughter through packed theaters, the kind that marionettes the whole crowd into a synchronized dance routine of frazzled nerves and spilled popcorn. Turn up your nose, if you must, at the lowly cheap sting of a jump scare. Smile gives that maligned device a workout for the ages. It rattles with aplomb.

Read more
Pearl review: a star is born (and is very, very bloody)
Mia Goth stares at the camera in the poster for Pearl.

Pearl is a candy-coated piece of rotten fruit. The film, which is director Ti West’s prequel to this year's X, trades in the desaturated look and 1970s seediness of its parent film for a lurid, Douglas Sirk-inspired aesthetic that seems, at first, to exist incongruently with its story of intense violence and horror. But much like its titular protagonist, whose youthful beauty and Southern lilt masks the monster within, there’s a poison lurking beneath Pearl’s vibrant colors and seemingly untarnished Depression-era America setting.

Set around 60 years before X, West’s new prequel does away with the por nstars, abandoned farms, and eerie old folks that made its predecessor’s horror influences clear and replaces them with poor farmers, charming film projectionists, and young women with big dreams. Despite those differences, Pearl still feels like a natural follow-up to X. The latter film, with its use of split screens and well-placed needle drops, offered a surprisingly dark rumination on the horror of old age. Pearl, meanwhile, explores the loss of innocence and, in specific, the often terrifying truths that remain after one’s dreams have been unceremoniously ripped away from them.

Read more