Skip to main content

‘Kingsman: The Golden Circle’ review

'Kingsman: The Golden Circle' can't stack bodies high enough to match the original

Matthew Vaughn spun the spy genre in a new direction with 2015’s surprise hit Kingsman: The Secret Service, but does the sequel measure up to its predecessor? Read on for our Kingsman: The Golden Circle review!

For almost as long as there have been spy movies, there have been films that subvert the traditions of the genre. Some go the comedy route, toying with the tropes of classic secret-agent stories, while others attempt to give the old-school aesthetic of James Bond adventures a modern overhaul, filling the screen with slick visual effects, gritty action, and over-the-top characters.

Despite all of these variations on a theme, few films have been as successful as 2015’s Kingsman: The Secret Service at giving audiences something truly unique in the well-worn genre.

Director Matthew Vaughn’s adaptation of the Kingsman comic book series by Mark Millar and Dave Gibbons was an expertly shot, hilariously raunchy, brutally violent, and brilliantly cast “R”-rated adventure that took just about everyone by surprise — to the tune of $414 million worldwide and glowing reviews. It’s also the film that made Oscar-winning actor Colin Firth a bona fide action hero, putting the star of The King’s Speech at the center of one of the most thrilling fight sequences of the year.

The fantastic action sequences that were such a thrill to behold in The Secret Service were no fluke.

All of those accomplishments made a sequel a foregone conclusion, but they also created some pretty big (and impeccably stylish) shoes for this year’s Kingsman: The Golden Circle to fill. This weekend’s follow-up to The Secret Service does manage to raise the bar in some areas, but it’s the elements the movie lacks this time around that keep it from replicating the success of that first, wild film.

Directed once again by Vaughn and co-written by Vaughn and his frequent collaborator, Jane Goldman, The Golden Circle brings back Taron Egerton as “Eggsy” Unwin, a talented young agent in the secret global spy organization Kingsman. Set four years after the events of The Secret Service, The Golden Circle pits Eggsy and a small group of Kingsman agents who survive an attack on their organization against a powerful drug cartel run by criminal mastermind Poppy Adams (Julianne Moore). Forced to seek assistance from Statesman, an American version of their organization, the team is eventually reunited with one of their greatest agents, Harry Hart (Colin Firth), who miraculously survived taking a bullet to the head the last time Kingsman saved the world.

If there’s one thing Vaughn proves beyond a doubt in The Golden Circle, it’s that the fantastic action sequences that were such a thrill to behold in The Secret Service were no fluke.

The Golden Circle lacks any single set piece as memorable as Firth’s expertly choreographed, masterfully acted takedown of an entire congregation of crazed bible-thumpers in The Secret Service, but it opts instead for quantity of action by packing in noticeably more fight sequences than its predecessor. There’s a sense of reckless momentum that runs through The Golden Circle, propelling its characters from one stylized gunfight or explosive brawl to the next. Vaughn is clearly comfortable assuming the audience is familiar with the characters at this point, and dispenses with anything that doesn’t serve to set up the next fight scene.

With a running time of just over two hours for The Golden Circle, that’s a lot of blood-spattered headshots and choreographed brawls, so it’s fortunate that Vaughn is so skilled at making ultra-violence so entertaining.

Although Julianne Moore’s wacky kingpin is entertaining, neither her character nor her character’s primary henchman — played by returning cast member Edward Holcroft — come close to holding your attention as well as Samuel L. Jackson and Sofia Boutella did in the first film, and the absence of that energy creates a void in The Golden Circle. Moore is a tremendously talented actress, but whether it’s a lack of screen time or simply an ill-fitted role, her villain never musters much in the way of menace and the film suffers for it.

Given how much inspiration the Kingsman films take from James Bond’s big-screen adventures — which are often defined as much by their villains as their super-spy hero — it makes sense that The Golden Circle suffers for its lack of a truly effective villain, but it’s disappointing all the same.

At times during The Golden Circle, it seems as if Vaughn realizes something is missing from the film, and compensates by cramming in a long list of high-profile supporting characters.

Channing Tatum’s rifle-toting Agent Tequila is frustratingly underused, while Elton John (yes, that Elton John) overstays his welcome with a role that goes far beyond a simple cameo and stretches what was initially a decent joke a bit too far. Returning actor Mark Strong feels shortchanged with his screen time as Kingsman operations expert Merlin after a strong introduction in The Secret Service, and a host of other characters — including those played by Halle Berry and Jeff Bridges — are introduced at various points only to seemingly disappear into the background or become bullet fodder (or worse) as the story speeds along.

Kingsman The Golden Circle review

One exception to the list of forgettable characters is Pedro Pascal’s whip-cracking, lasso-twirling Agent Whiskey.

The Game of Thrones and Narcos actor makes the best of the screen time he’s given with a fun performance that’s memorable for all the right reasons, and his character’s skills as a rope-handler (whips and lassos are his specialty) provide some of the film’s most clever, eye-catching action sequences. Pascal’s character feels right at home in the over-the-top world of Vaughn’s Kingsman films, and his action scenes — and dialogue — provide some of the film’s best moments.

As for franchise star Egerton, The Golden Circle is willing to let Eggsy carry the film on his shoulders, and for the most part, he does a good job of it.

Firth doesn’t steal the show this time around.

The base level for action in The Golden Circle is ratcheted up a bit from the original film (which is no small feat, given how exciting The Secret Service was), and Egerton doesn’t miss a beat as he’s called upon to pull off some impressive sequences. His chemistry with Firth is also quite good, and Vaughn is smart to have the two actors share the screen as often as possible.

Firth doesn’t steal the show this time around, but a sequence late in the film that has the two Kingsman agents cooperatively battling a common enemy is a masterpiece of choreography and camera work that does well by both actors.

Despite increasing the level of gore and raunchiness, The Golden Circle still feels noticeably tamer than its predecessor, which reveled in going off the rails whenever possible and busting the conventions of the super-spy genre. All too often, Vaughn’s sequel seems content to fall back on visual effects and an exponentially higher body count as a distraction from the movie’s flaws, but what’s underneath all of that visual spectacle simply isn’t as strong this time around.

In the end, there’s a lot that works well in The Golden Circle, but given the wonderfully clever way Vaughn and his cast created something fresh and new out of a well-worn genre in The Secret Service, it’s difficult not to expect something more — not the same, and certainly not less — from that film’s successor.

Rick Marshall
A veteran journalist with more than two decades of experience covering local and national news, arts and entertainment, and…
Operation Seawolf review: nice Nazis? No thanks!
Dolph Lundgren holds onto a pipe inside a U-Boat in a scene from Operation Seawolf.

At a time when anti-Semitic extremists are storming the U.S Capitol, running for office, and declaring war on Jewish people via social media, it might not be the best time for a movie that expects you to sympathize with Nazis. And yet, that hasn't stopped Operation Seawolf from sailing into theaters and on-demand streaming services this month.

The film, which follows the crew of a German U-boat during the waning days of World War II, casts Dolph Lundgren (Rocky IV) as German war hero Capt. Hans Kessler, who's ordered to lead the Nazis' remaining U-boats on a desperate (and likely fatal) mission to attack the U.S. on its own soil. As he and his crew make their way toward New York City in one final bid to turn the tide of war, Kessler finds himself struggling with both the internal politics of the ship and his own sense of duty as the Third Reich crumbles around him.

Read more
Conversations with A Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes review: killer’s words yield little insight
A superimposed image of Jeffrey Dahmer in Conversations with a Killer.

It’s spooky season this month, and that means the atrocity mine is currently being plundered by content creators across America. The three-episode docuseries Conversations with a Killer: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes, directed by noted documentarian Joe Berlinger (Brother's Keeper, Paradise Lost), is Netflix’s second project tackling the infamous cannibal/necrophiliac/serial killer to debut in a matter of weeks. It follows Ryan Murphy’s 10-hour miniseries drama, Dahmer-Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story. This Dahmer double dose mirrors the barrage of Ted Bundy content that Netflix put out in early 2019, following up the Zac Efron-led drama Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile with the docuseries Conversations with a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes (also directed by Berlinger). 

As was the case with Bundy, Netflix is convinced that a multipronged examination of Dahmer could lead to a better understanding of his psychology and motivations, teaching viewers warning signs or expanding our capacity for empathy. Or maybe they recognize that people are addicted to unspeakable tragedies and will do anything they can to maximize viewers’ compulsion for true crime? Attempting to satisfy on all accounts, The Dahmer Tapes oscillates uneasily between character study, social commentary, and pure shock value, landing somewhere in between all three.
In Dahmer's own words

Read more
Amsterdam review: An exhausting, overlong conspiracy thriller
Christian Bale, Margot Robbie, and John David Washington walk through a lobby together in Amsterdam.

Amsterdam could have been forgiven for being a lot of things, but dull is not one of them. The new film from writer-director David O. Russell boasts one of the most impressive ensemble casts of the year and is photographed by Emmanuel Lubezki, one of Hollywood’s premier cinematographers. Beyond that, its kooky premise and even wackier cast of characters open the door for Amsterdam to be the kind of screwball murder mystery that O. Russell, at the very least, seems uniquely well-equipped to make.

Instead, Amsterdam is a disaster of the highest order. It’s a film made up of so many disparate, incongruent parts that it becomes clear very early on in its 134-minute runtime that no one involved — O. Russell most of all — really knew what it is they were making. It is a misfire of epic proportions, a comedic conspiracy thriller that is written like a haphazard screwball comedy but paced like a meandering detective drama. Every element seems to be at odds with another, resulting in a film that is rarely funny but consistently irritating.

Read more