Skip to main content

Star Wars: Stories that still deserve Disney+ shows

Though Lucasfilm is still on its sabbatical from putting Star Wars movies on the big screen, Disney+ has quickly made itself a secondary home to the epic sci-fi fantasy franchise in the meantime. Even when the IP returns to theaters in 2023, whichever movie that ends up being, the parent company’s streaming platform will undoubtedly look to continue fleshing it out with TV shows. But as big as the galaxy far, far away is, there is still a wealth of lore ripe for tapping into.

While many supplemental Star Wars works were never truly considered canon even pre-Disney, the company effectively relegated almost everything else to Legends continuity when it bought the franchise for a staggering $4 billion. Lucasfilm has since been reintroducing elements of Legends stories in a piecemeal fashion, but there’s still thousands of years’ worth of history ripe for readapting.

Recommended Videos

The distant past of the Old Republic

Star Wars: The Old Republic MMORPG promo art featuring a collage of characters.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

For many veteran Star Wars fans, the dense lore of the Old Republic era is nothing new when it comes to stories in desperate need of Lucasfilm’s acknowledgment. The era itself is regarded as part of the Disney-era canon, though, only in vague pieces. Fan-favorite hero/villain character Revan has been confirmed to have existed in The Rise of Skywalker, but only through a supplemental Easter egg.

It would be admittedly easy to say “adapt the Knights of the Old Republic games.” But since video game developer Aspyr is set to release a top-to-bottom remake of at least BioWare’s original game for the PlayStation 5 and PC, it’d be best to dig into the other tens of thousands of years’ worth of history within that era alone for a new premise.

A great place to look toward for reference material would be Dark Horse Comics, as the publisher was known in decades past for padding out Star Wars’ extended universe. The publisher has since regained publishing rights to Star Wars, but its Tales of the Jedi comic book series from 1993 to 1998 could be a good template for a serialized — and canonized — Old Republic-era TV show on Disney+.

A Jedi wielding a green lightsaber and more in the background of Tales of the Jedi comic art.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

While that name is ironically going to be used in an upcoming anthology-style Star Wars animated series, the comics covered a large chunk from the Old Republic, ranging from the Great Sith War to the Great Hyperspace War. The crux of Tales of the Jedi‘s conflict stems from an ancient Jedi-turned-Sith and how his dark legacy inspires a pair of newly christened Sith to ignite a war against the Jedi.

This story is more than enough disconnected from the Skywalker Saga to avoid stepping on any canonical toes, and it would introduce an entirely fresh cast of heroes and villains in the process. Lucasfilm has been arguably playing it too safe with the stories they’ve been adapting post-Skywalker Saga, and while the likes of The Mandalorian have proven to be critically well-received hits, going into the distant past would be an exciting thing for audiences to see in live-action.

Having a wide cast of Jedi, Sith, and anything could make for a compelling story told from multiple perspectives and branching character arcs. There’s no reason to expect any straight adaptations of Legends works, but the prospect of having a new “Big Bad” in the form of Exar Kun and Qel-Droma could be reinvigorating — at least temporarily — for a franchise that still can’t seem to move past Darth Vader and Emperor Palpatine.

Darth Bane and the Rule of Two

A smoldering illusion of Darth Bane appearing before Yoda in The Clone Wars animated show.
Lucasfilm / Lucasfilm

Keeping up with the theme of the Dark Side of the Force and the Sith would be an especially interesting direction to focus on for Star Wars. Having them be shadowy puppet masters or snakes biding their time to strike is exciting to a point, but we’ve still seen surprisingly little of them in live-action for how imposing a threat they are to the galaxy.

During the waning days of the Old Republic, a single Sith Lord chose to uproot the “establishment Sith” for how ineffective they were as a group in combatting the Jedi. The Sith were inherently tribalistic, selfish, and power-hungry, which meant that a unified force or masses of Masters and Apprentices would never last. Infighting was rampant, making the Sith an enemy of themselves as much as the Jedi.

Therefore, there’s a canonical reason as to why we’ve only ever seen a couple of them at a time in the movies: The Rule of Two. Palpatine himself was enforcing it in the movies, which was that there could only ever be one Master and one Apprentice. One to hold the power, and one to crave it.

Of course, this would certainly lead to a regicide once — or if — the apprentice becomes strong enough. But should the Master kill his attempted usurper, another apprentice takes their place. It’s a cruel way to sustain the new Sith order, but it lasted them hundreds of years. And the creation and creator of the Rule of Two — Darth Bane — would make an excellent premise for a serialized Disney+ show.

Split image of the reprinted editions of the Darth Bane trilogy.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Author Drew Karpyshyn wrote a trilogy of books centered around this villain — who’s since been acknowledged in canon — detailing how he mercilessly killed the skeleton crew of Sith Lords still desperately holding onto the shred of influence they had left, and eventually took on an apprentice named Darth Zannah. As the trilogy went on, it put more focus on this young Sith Apprentice and how she eventually challenged Darth Bane for his title.

Having a series that puts the villains’ perspective at the forefront would be an ambitious new direction for a major live-action Star Wars project to go. Not enough is known about the Sith’s history in canon, and Lucasfilm shouldn’t coast on them being perpetually unknown villains forever. Getting bolder is something it will need to do once it can inevitably no longer get away with making more gaps in prequel, original, and sequel trilogies, and embracing more Legends lore — as well as unadapted canon — would be an excellent way to do that.

Guillermo Kurten
Freelance Writer, Entertainment
A University of Houston graduate in Print Media Journalism, Guillermo has covered sports entertainment and practically all…
Shawn Levy’s Star Wars movie finds a writer
Shawn Levy poses for a photo on the left, and the Star Wars logo is located on the right.

Shawn Levy is heading to a galaxy far, far away, and he's bringing a friend with him.

Per Jeff Sneider of The Insneider, Jonathan Tropper will pen Levy's Star Wars movie. Levy and Tropper have collaborated on several projects together, including 2014's This Is Where I Leave You and 2022's The Adam Project, with the latter being Netflix's third-most-popular movie in the streamer's history.

Read more
The Acolyte can’t escape Star Wars’ biggest Jedi problem
Sol stands between Jecki and Yord in The Acolyte.

Across its first three episodes, The Acolyte has gotten off to a propulsive, if imperfect, start. The series, created by Russian Doll co-creator Leslye Headland, is one of the only truly original (i.e., not a spinoff) pieces of Star Wars media that Disney has produced in the 12 years since it acquired Lucasfilm. As depressing as that is in and of itself, it's also helped The Acolyte. The show, for all of its flaws, feels fresh. It isn't weighed down or suffocatingly constricted by the events of any other Star Wars movie or TV show and, therefore, has the freedom to explore its characters and plot exactly how it wants.

That doesn't mean The Acolyte has been able to completely avoid making the same mistakes as all of the Star Wars titles that have come before it. On the contrary, the series, which focuses on the reemergence of the Sith near the end of the High Republic era, has struggled in its depiction of the Jedi Order. The Acolyte has, consequently, revived an issue that has plagued its franchise ever since 1999's Star Wars: Episode I — The Phantom Menace.
Are the Jedi cool samurai or boo-worthy space cops?

Read more
Star Wars: The Phantom Menace is better and worse than you remember
Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan duel Darth Maul in Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace.

This month marks the 25th anniversary of Star Wars: Episode I — The Phantom Menace. The film, the opening installment in George Lucas' Prequel Trilogy, was the first Star Wars movie in 16 years when it was released. Shortly after it hit theaters in May 1999, though, it became the target of a lot of vitriol and criticism. Star Wars fans went into it expecting a prequel that felt of a piece with the franchise's Original Trilogy. Instead, what they got was a CGI-heavy, polished, and unexpectedly stiff epic about, among other things, child slavery, trade laws, and senatorial politics. In a lot of ways, the film couldn't have been more different from 1977's swashbuckling, fairy tale-like Star Wars: Episode IV — A New Hope.

Over the past few years, a lot of Star Wars fans have adopted a much kinder tone when discussing The Phantom Menace and its fellow prequels. That's been due, in no small part, to the lackluster quality of Disney's Sequel Trilogy. For many of the viewers who were introduced at a young age to Star Wars through the prequels, the films also hold a special, nostalgic place in their hearts. With that in mind and, in honor of its forthcoming anniversary, it's worth asking: Is The Phantom Menace really as bad as so many fans remember? Or is it as good as some of its younger supporters believe?

Read more